COMPARISON OF MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE, ENDOSEQUENCE ROOT REPAIR MATERIAL, AND BIODENTINE USED FOR REPAIRING ROOT PERFORATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Abstract
The root perforation, in spite of being taken as a challenging accident in root canal treatment, has to offer favorable results when exposed to appropriate therapeutic conduct and the usage of materials that have convenient properties. The aim of the current review is to collect all updated and available studies including imperative information concerning the use of Mineral trioxide aggregate, EndoSequence root repair material and Biodentine in the treatment of root perforation approaching some of the key properties for treatment success. A search was performed in the two automated databases (Google Scholar and PubMed use English-language literature) for this systematic review, using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and keywords. The electronic search was done in December 2018 and update in June 2019. Our inquiry uncovered Twenty-two studies that met the exclusion and inclusion criteria. These studies investigated the use of MTA, EndoSequence ERRM and Biodentine in the root perforation that happened during the endodontic treatment. It was confirmed that there is no unanimity in this review concerning the material that shows the best characteristics, once none of the materials discussed had all the major properties higher than the others, this way it is required the enforcement of further studies aimed at selecting the best characteristics of the material suggested in the root perforation treatment.
Keywords
References
- 1. Apostolska, S., et al., Biodentinetm as a furcal perforation repair material: A case series. Medicinski pregled, 2017. 70(7-8): p. 223-225.
- 2. Silva, L.A.B., et al., Furcation perforation: periradicular tissue response to Biodentine as a repair material by histopathologic and indirect immunofluorescence analyses. Journal of endodontics, 2017. 43(7): p. 1137-1142.
- 3. Tabassum, S. and F.R. Khan, Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. European journal of dentistry, 2016. 10(1): p. 144.
- 4. Silvestre, A., et al., FURCAL DRILLING TREATMENT: CASE REPORT. . Catholic Academic Day of the Academics, 2017. 2(1).
- 5. Haghgoo, R., et al., An in vitro comparison of furcal perforation repaired with pro-root MTA and new endodontic cement in primary molar teeth-a microleakage study. Journal of Dentistry, 2014. 15(1): p. 28.
- 6. Azim, A.A., A. Lloyd, and G.T.-J. Huang, Management of longstanding furcation perforation using a novel approach. Journal of endodontics, 2014. 40(8): p. 1255-1259.
- 7. Kaushik, A., et al., Management of iatrogenic root perforation with pulp canal obliteration. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 2014. 4(3): p. 141.
- 8. Lagisetti, A.K., P. Hegde, and M.N. Hegde, Evaluation of bioceramics and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement in repair of furcation perforations: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 2018. 21(2): p. 184-189.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Review
Authors
Faisal Alghamdi
*
0000-0003-2086-0772
Saudi Arabia
Esraa Aljahdali
0000-0002-2530-3054
Saudi Arabia
Publication Date
December 29, 2019
Submission Date
July 9, 2019
Acceptance Date
September 12, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 22 Number: 4
Cited By
Clinical Properties and Efficacy of MTA VS Biodentine VS GIC in Repairing Root Perforations
Archives Of Pharmacy Practice
https://doi.org/10.51847/46MIz4CalqComparison of the Microleakages of Four Root-End Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study
Cureus
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40461Marginal microleakage of newly synthesized nanostructured materials based on calcium aluminate after application in interradicular perforations
Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije
https://doi.org/10.2298/SGS2302079JThe Management of Root Perforation: A Review of the Literature
Cureus
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72296Comparative Study of MTA, Biodentine, and GIC for Root Perforation Repair: Clinical Outcomes and Properties
Annals of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapy
https://doi.org/10.51847/luJ7ZKxRwm