İSKELETSEL SINIF III MALOKLÜZYONUN KAPAKLI BRAKETLERLE ORTODONTİK VE CERRAHİ TEDAVİSİ

Hasan Mutaf; Cenk Doruk; Sarper Yılmaz; İhsan Güvenç

doi:10.7126/cdj.58140.5000013128

EN TR

Orthodontic and orthognathic management of skeletal Class III malocclusion with selfligating brackets

Abstract

This case report presents the orthodontic andorthognathic surgery treatment of a non-growingpatient with class III malocclusion. A 17 year oldfemale patient presented a dental and skeletal classIII malocclusion characterized by mandibulerprognathism and maxillary retrognathism. Selfligating brackets were preferred for pre-surgicalorthodontic management which lasted for 14mounths. Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery wasperformed to correct maxillary-mandibulerdiscrepancy after the pre-surgical orthodontictreatment. Final teeth positions and the occlusionwas improved by post–surgical orthodontictreatment, class I dental and skeletal occlusion anda straight soft tissue profile were achieved withoutextraction. Using self-ligating brackets duringorthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment ofclass III patients provides more aesthetic and stableresults by improving the treatment efficiency.

Keywords

References

Kan H. İskeletsel Sınıf III maloklüzyonlu bireylerde ortodontik tedavinin dentofasiyal yapılar ve üst hava yolları üzerine olan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi.(Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı; 2012
Turpin DL. Camouflage might not mean compromise. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:241.
Başçiftçi FA, İleri Z, Yavuzer R. İskeletsel Sınıf III açık kapanışa sahip bir olgunun ortodontik-cerrahi tedavisi. 2012;28:50–53.
Aksoy AT, Özgentaş E. Sınıf III maloklüzyonlar ve ortognatik cerrahi. Türk Ortod. Derg. 1989;2:152–59.
Özpar R. İki farklı kendinden bağlanan braket sisteminin mandibular kesici dişlerin seviyelenme safhasındaki etkinliklerinin konvansiyonel braketlerle karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesi (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul: Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı; 2011.
Eliades T, Pandis N. Self-Ligation in Orthodontics. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009:1-19.
Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001;4:220–27.
Maijer R, Smith DC. Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J. Clin. Orthod. 1990;24:29–31.

Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001;4:228–34
Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472–80.
Harris M, Hunt N (eds). Fundamentals of orthodontic surgery, 2nd edn. Ortognatik cerrahinin temelleri. (Çeviri: Apaydın A.) İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık, 2009.
Harradine NWT. Current Products and Practices Self-ligating brackets : where are we now ? 2003;30:262–73.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics 4rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2007: 268-331.
Saelens NA, De Smit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur. J. Orthod. 1998;20:225–36.
Carlos A, Ruellas DO, Martins R, Romano FL. Tooth extraction in orthodontics : an evaluation of diagnostic elements. 2010;15:134–57.
Cetlin NM, Spena R, Vandarsdall RL. Nonexraction treatment. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall Jr RL, Vig KW (eds). Current Principles and Techniques, 4rd edn. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005:855-79.
Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin. Orthod. 1995;1:67–81.
Sergl HG, Lautenbach B. Über den Wert ästhetischer Normen im Rahmen der Profilbeurteilung. Fortschr. Kieferorthop. 1984;45:87–100.
Turvey TA, Bell RB, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Self-reinforced biodegradable screw fixation compared with titanium screw fixation in mandibular advancement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2006;64:40–6.
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729–55.
Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J. Oral Surg. 1980;38:744–51.
Bishara SE. Longitudinal cephalometric standards from 5 years of age to adulthood. Am. J. Orthod. 1981;79:35–44.
McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am. J. Orthod. 1984;86:449–69.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hasan Mutaf

Cenk Doruk

Sarper Yılmaz

İhsan Güvenç

Publication Date

April 3, 2014

Submission Date

April 3, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 17 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000013128

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA96BN52MP

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Mutaf H, Doruk C, Yılmaz S, Güvenç İ (May 1, 2014) İSKELETSEL SINIF III MALOKLÜZYONUN KAPAKLI BRAKETLERLE ORTODONTİK VE CERRAHİ TEDAVİSİ. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 17 2 166–174.

Orthodontic and orthognathic management of skeletal Class III malocclusion with selfligating brackets

Abstract

Keywords