Kemomekanik çürük kaldırma yöntemlerinde güncel yaklaşımlar

Simge Kisbet; Ayşegül Ölmez

doi:10.7126/cdj.2012.1308

Kemomekanik çürük kaldırma yöntemlerinde güncel yaklaşımlar

Öz

The change in the concepts of cavity preparation and the production of reliable adhesive materials lead to the development of alternative methods of caries removal. Painless, minimal intervention and thus giving comfort, relief and instill positive attitude toward dental treatments, are some of the factors justifying the specialty of pediatric dentistry. Chemomechanical caries removal method is a conservative and atraumatic alternative and recently comes up again by means of developed a new chemomechanical caries removal agent papain-based gel (Papacárie^®, Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo, Brazil). The purpose of this paper is to perform a comprehensive review of the literature regarding chemomechanical caries removal methods, including the most recently available caries removal agent.

Keywords: Dental caries, chemomechanical caries removal, papacarie.

ÖZET

Kavite hazırlama prensiplerindeki değişim ve güvenilir adeziv materyallerin üretilmesi, çürüğün kaldırılmasında alternatif metotların geliştirilmesine yol açmıştır. Ağrısız, minimal müdahale ve bunun sağladığı konfor, güven ve diş tedavilerine olumlu yaklaşım, özellikle çocuk diş hekimliğinde aranılan özelliklerdir. Kemomekanik çürük kaldırma yöntemi konservatif ve atravmatik bir alternatiftir ve son zamanlarda geliştirilen yeni bir kemomekanik çürük kaldırıcı ajan, papain bazlı jel (Papacárie^®, Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo, Brezilya) sayesinde tekrar gündeme gelmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı, yeni üretilen çürük kaldırma ajanı da dahil olmak üzere kemomekanik çürük kaldırma yöntemleri ile ilgili kapsamlı bir literatür derlemesi yapmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diş çürüğü, kemomekanik çürük kaldırma, papacarie

References

Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 67.
Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mc Tiggue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Çocuk Diş Hekimliği (Bebeklikten Ergenliğe). Tortop T, Tulunoğlu Ö (Çev), 4. Basım. Ankara: Atlas Kitapçılık; 2009. p. 199-203.
Lozano-Chourio MA, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (CarisolvTM). Int J Paediatr Dent ;16:161-167. Correa FN, Rocha RO, Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues CR. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007;31:189-194.
Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Verma L. Various methods of caries removal in children: A comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25:93-96.
Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical chemomechanical caries removal in of primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35:205
Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;34:117-123.
Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M, Kaleka R, Laboux O, Lafont J, Medioni E, Serfaty R, Toumelin-Chemla F, Tubiana J, Lasfargues JJ. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:32-37.
Gürbüz T, Yılmaz Y, Şengül F. Performance of laser fluorescence for residual caries detection in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2008;2:176-184.

Mc Donald RE, Avery DR. Restorative dentistry. In: Mc Donald RE, Avery DR, editors. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 7 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 390.
Abdelnur JP, Cerqueira DF, Castro GF, Maia LC, de Souza IP. Strategies for addressing restorative challenges in HIV-infected children. J Dent Child 2008;75:69-73.
Flückiger L, Waltimo T, Stich H, Lussi chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro. J Dent 2005;33:87-90.
Kakaboura A, Masouras C, Staikou O, Vougiouklakis G. A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. Quintessence Int ;34:269-271. Inglehart Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ. removal in children: An operator’s and pediatric patients’ responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:47-55. of MR, Peters MC, Chemomechanical caries Streptococcus
Lactobacillus SPP in carious dentine of primary teeth. J Appl Oral Sci ;13:399-405. resin Br Dent J report on means of J mutans and Kırzıoğlu Z, Gürbüz T, Yılmaz Y. Clinical chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Clin Oral Invest 2007;11:69-76.
Piva E, Ogliari FA, de Moraes RR, Cora F, Henn S, Correr-Sobrinho L. Papain-based gel for biochemical caries microtensile bond strength to dentin. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:364-370.
Bertassoni LE, Marshall GW. Papain-gel nonmineralized type 1 collagen fibrils. Scanning 2009;31:253-258.
Gianini RJ, do Amaral FL, Flório FM, Basting RT. Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self- etch demineralized dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical method. Am J Dent 2010;23:23-28.
Botelho Amaral FL, Martao Florio F, Bovi Ambrosano GM, Basting RT. Morphology and microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to in situ-formed caries-affected dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical gel method. Am J Dent 2011;24:13-19.
Carrillo CM, Tanaka MH, Cesar MF, Camargo MA, Juliano Y, Novo NF. Use of Papain gel in disabled patients. J Dent Child 2008;75:222
Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Bachiega JC, Santis TO, Motta LJ. Clinical and radiographic study of chemical- mechanical removal of caries using Papacárie: 24-month follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;35:251-254.
Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain-gel: a new chemo- mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30:115-119.
Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Hermida Bruno ML, Ram D. Chemo- mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using papain gel: case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent ;32:177-180.