Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using Different File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study

Olcay Özdemir; Ecehan Hazar; Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Baran Can Sağlam

doi:10.7126/cumudj.565698

EN

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using Different File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of instrumentation techniques on the postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment.

Materials and Methods: Sixty patients having an indication of endodontic treatment were included. Only single rooted teeth were selected The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In group 1; the root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Next instruments with rotational motion, in group 2 TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion were used during instrumentation. Treatments were completed in a single appointment. Postoperative pain questionnaires were scored by patients using a four-point pain intensity scale for 12, 24, and 48 hours. Mann Whitney-U, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used for analyzing the final data.

Results: The comparison of time intervals between groups demonstrated no difference between both groups (p>.05). In both groups, the postoperative pain values of 12h time period were significantly higher than both other periods, and significant difference was found between 24h and 48h time periods (p<0.05). The postoperative pain values of 48h time period were significantly lower than the other two time periods (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Both instrumentation techniques caused postoperative pain. The pain scores indicated that both techniques caused limited discomfort associated with slight pain which did not require any additional treatment and medication.

Keywords

pain,root canal preparation,root canal tretment

References

1. Cicek E, Koçak MM, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Türker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:20–26.
2. Alves Vde O. Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:68–72.
3. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple- visit endodontic treatment: a systematic rewiew. Int Endod J 2008;41:191–196.
4. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38:850–852.
5. Caviedes- Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2016;49:255–270.
6. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541–544.
7. Bürklein S, Mayhey D, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Protaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:774–781.
8. Koçak MM, Çicek E, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Yılmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using Protaper Universal and Protaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015;48:283–289.

9. Akbulut MB, Akman M, Terlemez A, Magat G, Sener S, Shetty H. Efficacy of Twisted file Adaptive, Resiproc and Protaper Universal Retreatment instruments for root-canal-filling removal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Mater J 2016;35:126–131.10. McCrirrick A, Hunter S. Pain on injection of propofol: the effect of injectate temperature. Anaesthesia 1990;45:443–444.
11. Sue Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:125–132.
12. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:429–438.
13. El Mubarak AH, Abu-bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Postoperative pain in multiple-visit and single-visit root canal treatment. J Endod 2010;36:36–39.
14. Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J 2004;37:531–541.
15. Comparin D, Moreira EJL, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Arias A, Silva EJNL. Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2017;43:1084–1088.
16. Gambarini G, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Guerra F, Di Giorgio G, Glassman G, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. The Influence of a New Clinical Motion for Endodontic Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain. Clin Ter 2017;168:23–27.
17. Yaylali IE, Kurnaz S, Tunca YM. Maintaining Apical Patency Does Not Increase Postoperative Pain in Molars with Necrotic Pulp and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod 2018;44:335–340.
18. Seltzer S. Pain in endodontics. 1986. J Endod 2004; 30:501–503.
19. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J 2015;41:78–87.
20. Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S. Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2013;39:173–176.
21. Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L. Comparison of postobturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 2010;43:692–697.
22. Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Fvieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457–458.
23. Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2016;42:171–176.
24. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol 2013;20:152–155.
25. Relvas JB, Bastos MM, Marques AA, Garrido AD, Sponchiado EC Jr. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1987-1993.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Olcay Özdemir
0000-0001-8867-1551
Türkiye

Ecehan Hazar
0000-0002-7610-9622
Türkiye

Mustafa Murat Koçak
0000-0003-3881-589X
Türkiye

Sibel Koçak
0000-0003-2354-7108
Türkiye

Baran Can Sağlam ^*
0000-0002-2090-5304
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 9, 2019

Submission Date

May 15, 2019

Acceptance Date

June 24, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 22 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.565698

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA76NP67DN

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Özdemir O, Hazar E, Koçak MM, Koçak S, Sağlam BC (September 1, 2019) Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using Different File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 3 292–298.

Cited By

The Editor’s recommendation of this issue’s article to readers

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.617264