Effects of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic or Ceromer to Resin Cement

Ayse Atay; Elcin Sagırkaya

doi:10.7126/cumudj.497650

EN

Effects of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic or Ceromer to Resin Cement

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the micro-tensile bond strength (MTBS) of two different indirect restoration materials (resin nano ceramic CAD/CAM material [Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE]; ceromer material [Estenia C&B, Kuraray Medical]).

Materials and Methods: Specimens were prepared from each test material in dimensions of 3×10×10 mm. The specimens were divided into five different surface treatment groups: group 1 (control [C]), no treatment; group 2 (acid etching [A]); group 3 (acid etching + universal adhesive [AA]); group 4 (sandblasting [S]); and group 5 (sandblasting + universal adhesive [SA]). The prepared specimens were cemented to composite parts (Filtek Z250 Universal Restorative, 3M ESPE) of the same size using dual-cure adhesive resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical). A total, 100 bar-shaped specimens (6×1×1 mm) were cut using a low-speed diamond saw (n=10 in each group). The MTBS test was performed in all groups (Shimadzu AG-50 kNG, Kyoto, Japan, 1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p<0.05.

Results: The MTBS values were significantly influenced by the type of restorative material and surface treatment (p<0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the materials and surface treatments procedures (p<0.05). For Lava Ultimate and Estenia C&B materials, the highest MTBS value was obtained in the SA surface treatment (p<0.05) and the lowest MTBS value was obtained in the control groups (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The application of silane-containing universal adhesive material after sandblasting was the ideal surface treatment for both materials.

Keywords

Resin nano ceramic,Ceromer,Micro-tensile bond strength,Surface Treatments

References

Reference1. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, et al. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-495.
Reference2. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, et al. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-495.
Reference3. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-235.
Reference4. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, et al. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-962.
Reference5. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-540.
Reference6. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, et al. Marjinal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer- composite Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:500-509.
Reference7. Armstrong DJ, Kimball D. Fiber-reinforced polymer ceramic fixed partial dentures in the esthetic zone: a clinical and laboratory case perspective. Quintessence Dent Technol 2000;25:104-113.
Reference8. Kurt EÇ, Özdoğan MS, Yılmaz H. Ceromers and fiber-reinforced composites. The Journal of Dental Faculty of Atatürk University 2006;16:52-60.

Reference9. Waki T, Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K et al. Adesive strength between fiber reinforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:364-368.
Reference10. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:163–169.
Reference11. Elsaka SE. Effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013;44:407.
Reference12. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290.
Reference13. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-257.
Reference14. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71.
Reference15. Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, et al. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014;30:147-162.
Reference16. Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, et al. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/ CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-266.
Reference17. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-164.
Reference18. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484.
Reference19. Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, et al. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent 2017;59,18-25.
Reference20. Kömürcüoğlu MB, Sağırkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:439-446.
Reference21. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:20-24.
Reference22. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003;19:575-583.
Reference23. Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater 2011;27:99-105.
Reference24. Colares RC, Neri JR, Souza AM, et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Braz Dent J 2013;24:349-352.
Reference25. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308.
Reference26. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-167.
Reference27. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N., Kleverlaan CJ, et al. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-991.
Reference28. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, et al. Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic. J Dent 2007;35:282-288.
Reference29. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, et al. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:265-273.
Reference30. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/ CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
Reference31. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L Jr, et al. Influence of acid etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:79-85.
Reference32. Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T, et al. Development of a new single-bottle multi-purpose primer for bonding to dental porcelain, alumina, zirconia, and dental gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011;30:478–484.
Reference33. Li R. Development of a ceramic primer with higher bond durability for resin cement. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:560-568.
Reference34. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, et al. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-1483.
Reference35. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-513.
Reference36. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, et al. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-855.
Reference37. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-892.
Reference38. Pollington S, Fabianelli A, van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010;26:864-872.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ayse Atay
0000-0002-5358-0753
Türkiye

Elcin Sagırkaya ^*
0000-0002-4863-1296
Türkiye

Publication Date

May 31, 2019

Submission Date

December 16, 2018

Acceptance Date

February 26, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 22 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.497650

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA59UU25YE

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Atay A, Sagırkaya E (May 1, 2019) Effects of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic or Ceromer to Resin Cement. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 2 226–234.