Fortification of Fractured Instrument Removal Simulated Roots Using Several Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Tuğrul Aslan; Yakup Üstün; Firdevs Çınar; Salih Düzgün; İbrahim Şener

doi:10.7126/cumudj.391219

EN

Fortification of Fractured Instrument Removal Simulated Roots Using Several Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the forces required to fracture roots obturated with different calcium silicate – based materials, after applying a fractured instrument removal simulation.

Material and Methods: Seventy-five mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated. Then, all root canals were instrumented using Reciproc system. To mimic the root canal anatomy after the removal of a fractured instrument, each canal was enlarged with a size-3 Peeso reamer. The specimens were distributed into experimental groups according to the materials used for the root fortification: G1: Negative control, G2: ProRoot MTA, G3: Ortho MTA, G4: Biodentine, G5: Endocem MTA. Then, the teeth were embedded into acrylic blocks. A vertical fracture test was applied, and the fracture loads were recorded. Statistical interpretations were made (α=0.05).

Results: G2, G3, G4, and G5 showed greater fracture resistances than G1 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference among G2, G3, G4, and G5 (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Any of the tested materials could be chosen to reinforce the root after the removal of a fractured instrument.

Keywords

Biodentine,Endocem MTA,Ortho MTA,ProRoot MTA,Root reinforcing,Seperated instrument removal

References

10. Kim M, Yang W, Kim H, Ko H. Comparison of the Biological Properties of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and Endocem MTA Cements. J Endod 2014;40:1649-53.
11. Lee BN, Son HJ, Noh HJ, Koh JT, Chang HS, Hwang IN, et al. Cytotoxicity of newly developed ortho MTA root-end filling materials. J Endod 2012;38:1627-30.
12. Choi Y, Park SJ, Lee SH, Hwang YC, Yu MK, Min KS. Biological effects and washout resistance of a newly developed fast-setting pozzolan cement. J Endod 2013;39:467-72.
13. Kim JR, Nosrat A, Fouad AF. Interfacial characteristics of Biodentine and MTA with dentine in simulated body fluid. J Dent 2015;43:241-7.
14. Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod 2005;31:450-2.
15. Moule AJ, Kahler B. Diagnosis and management of teeth with vertical root fractures. Aust Dent J 1999;44:75-87.
16. Madarati AA, Qualtrough AJ, Watts DC. Effect of retained fractured instruments on tooth resistance to vertical fracture with or without attempt at removal. Int Endod J 2010;43:1047-53.
17. Bortoluzzi EA, Souza EM, Reis JM, Esberard RM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Fracture strength of bovine incisors after intra-radicular treatment with MTA in an experimental immature tooth model. Int Endod J 2007;40:684-91.

18. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Raimundo L, Zheng L, Chong L, Friedman M, Andreasen JO. Fracture resistance and histological findings of immature teeth treated with mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:272-6.
19. Schmoldt SJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE, Yaccino JM. Reinforcement of simulated immature roots restored with composite resin, mineral trioxide aggregate, gutta-percha, or a fiber post after thermocycling. J Endod 2011;37:1390-3.
1. Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod 2013;39:569-81.
20. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth filled with Biodentine and white mineral trioxide aggregate – an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol 2016;32:116-20.
21. Jefferies S. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:27-39.
22. Jefferies SR. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part I. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:14-26.
23. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
24. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:97-100.
25. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. Biomineralization ability and interaction of mineral trioxide aggregate and white portland cement with dentin in a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod 2009;35:731-6.
26. Kim HM, Kishimoto K, Miyaji F Kokubo T, Yao T, Suetsugu Y, et al. Composition and structure of apatite formed on organic polymer in simulated body fluid with a high content of carbonate ion. J Mater Sci Mater Med. Materials in Medicine 2000;11:421-6.
27. Oyane A, Kim HM, Furuya T, Kokubo T, Miyazaki T, Nakamura T. Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:188-95.
28. Han L, Kodama S, Okiji T. Evaluation of calcium-releasing and apatite-forming abilities of fast-setting calcium silicate-based endodontic materials. Int Endod J 2015;48:124-30.
29. Han L, Okiji T. Bioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate-based endodontic materials. Int Endod J 2013;46:808-14.
2. Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. Br Dent J 2008;204:241-5.
30. AM EL-Ma, Qualtrough AJ, Watts DC. Resistance to vertical fracture of MTA-filled roots. Dent Traumatol 2014;30:36-42.
3. Knowles KI, Hammond NB, Biggs SG, Ibarrola JL. Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod 2006;32:14-6.
4. Wolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, et al. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. J Endod 2006;32:1139-41.
5. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32:1048-52.
6. Siqueira JF, Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34:1-10.
7. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003;29:523-8.
8. Gerek M, Baser ED, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Bayirli G. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:429-34.
9. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010;36:400-13.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tuğrul Aslan ^*
Türkiye

Yakup Üstün
Türkiye

Firdevs Çınar
Türkiye

Salih Düzgün
Türkiye

İbrahim Şener
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 17, 2018

Submission Date

February 6, 2018

Acceptance Date

April 25, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 21 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.391219

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA74FL58LR

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Aslan T, Üstün Y, Çınar F, Düzgün S, Şener İ (October 1, 2018) Fortification of Fractured Instrument Removal Simulated Roots Using Several Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 21 3 249–255.

Fortification of Fractured Instrument Removal Simulated Roots Using Several Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Abstract

Keywords

Öz

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite