EFFECT OF TWO ACTIVATED BLEACHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DIFFERENT ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

Tuncay Alptekın; Özgün Yusuf Özyılmaz; Filiz Aykent; Haluk Barış Kara

doi:10.7126/cumudj.369086

TR EN

İki Aktive Olan Beyazlatma Tekniğinin Farklı Estetik Restoratif Materyallerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Amaçlar: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, mavi ışık yayan diyot (LED) ve diyot lazer ile foto aktive olan ofis tipi beyazlatma prosedürleri esnasında altı farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğünü değerlendirmektir.

Materyal ve Metotlar: Bu çalışmada Filtek TM supreme, Tetric Evo Ceram, Tescera ATL, Clearfill Majesty Esthetic, Durafill VS ve IPS Empress 2 materyalleri kullanıldı. Yirmi örnek; her biri 10 mm çapında 2 mm kalınlığında olacak şekilde teflon kalıp kullanılarak oluşturuldu. Bütün örnekler rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Grup 1’ de topikal uygulanan %35’lik hidrojen peroksit LED kullanılarak 20 saniye süreyle foto aktive edildi. Grup 2’ de %46’lık hidrojen peroksit diode lazer kullanılarak topikal olarak uygulandı. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri başlangıç ve beyazlatma işlemleri sonrasında olmak üzere profilometre yardımıyla ölçüldü. Veriler tek-yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Tamhane's T2 ve bağımsız t testleri yapılarak istatiksel olarak analiz edildi.

Sonuçlar: Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri test edilen tüm restoratif materyallerde her iki beyazlatma prosedüründe de artmıştır (p<0,05). Diode lazer foto aktivasyonu ile beyazlatılan Tescera ATL, LED ile aktive edilenden daha yüksek yüzey pürüzlülüğü değeri gösterdi (p<0,05). Fakat diğer restoratif materyaller için iki beyazlatma prosedüründe de önemli farklılıklar ortaya çıkmadı (p>0,05).

Çıkarımlar: Klinik etkiler in-vivo şartlara bağlı olmasına rağmen ofis tipi beyazlatma ajanlarının etkileri bilinmeli ve renklenmiş bir restorasyon beyazlatıldığında veya beyazlatılmış diş ile komşu restorasyon varlığında dikkatle kullanılmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Estetik restoratif materyaller,Dental porselen,Diş beyazlatma,Yüzey pürüzlülüğü,Yarı iletken lazerler

EFFECT OF TWO ACTIVATED BLEACHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DIFFERENT ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate surface roughness of six different restorative materials during office bleaching procedures with blue light emitted diode (LED) and diode laser photo activation.

Materials and Methods: Filtek TM supreme, Tetric Evo Ceram, Tescera ATL, Clearfill Majesty Esthetic, Durafill VS and IPS Empress 2 materials were evaluated in this study. Twenty specimens, 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were fabricated from each material using a teflon mold. All specimens were randomly assigned to two groups (n=10). Group 1 received two topical applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide for 20 s. And was photoactivated using LED. Group 2 received topical application of 46% hydrogen peroxide using diode laser. Surface roughness values were measured prior to and following bleaching procedures by using a profilometer. Data were analyzed statistically, by one-way-analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tamhane's T2 and independent t tests.

Results: Surface roughness values for all restorative materials tested increased after both bleaching procedures (p<0.05). Tescera ATL bleached with diode laser photo activation showed higher surface roughness value than LED activation (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in two bleaching methods for other restorative materials (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Although clinical effects depend on in-vivo conditions, the effects of office bleaching agents should be known and applied cautiously when a colored restoration is bleached or a restoration is neighboured with the tooth bleached.

Keywords: Esthetic restorative materials, Dental porcelain, Teeth bleaching, Surface roughness, Semiconductor lasers

Keywords

Esthetic restorative materials,Dental porcelain,Teeth bleaching,Surface roughness,Semiconductor lasers

References

1. Haywood VB. Achieving, maintaining and recovering successful tooth bleaching. J Esthet Dent 1996; 8:31-38
2. Haywood WB, Berry TG. Natural tooth bleaching Chapt15 Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach 2nd Chicago Quintessence Publishing; 2001
3. Matis BA, Mousa HN, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Clinical evaluation of bleaching agents of different concentrations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:303-310
4. Sulieman M. An overview of bleaching techniques, 1: history, chemistry, safety and legal aspects. Dent Update 2004;31:608-616
5. Sulieman M. An overview of bleaching techniques: 2. Night guard vital bleaching and non-vital bleaching. SADJ 2006; 61:352–354
6. Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 2006;34:412-419
7. Luca G, Fabio B, Claudia B, Michele N, Daniele SR. A randomized clinical trial comparing at-home and in-office tooth whitening techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:1357-1364
8. Dadoun MP, Bartlett DW. Safety issues when using carbamide peroxide to bleach vital teeth-a review of the literature. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2003;11:9-13

9. Buchalla W, Attin T. External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser-a systematic review. Dent Mater 2007;23:586–596
10. Domínguez A, García JA, Costela A, Gómez C. Influence of the light source and bleaching gel on the efficacy of the tooth whitening process Photomed and Laser Surg 2011;29:53-59
11. Luk K, Tam L, Hubert M. Effect of light energy on peroxide tooth bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:194–201
12. Walsh LJ. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J 2003;48:146–155
13. Sun, G. The role of lasers in cosmetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:831–850
14. Zhang C, Wang X, Kinoshita JI, Zhao B, Toko T, Kimura Y et al. Effects of KTP laser irradiation, diode laser and LED on tooth bleaching: A comparative study Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:91-95
15. Turker SB, Biskin T. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 466-473
16. Moraes RR, Marimon JLM, Schneider LFJ, Sobrinho LC, Camacho GB, Bueno M. Carbamide peroxide bleaching agents: effects on surface roughness of enamel , composite and porcelain. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:23-28
17. Atali PY, Topbasi FB. The effect of different bleaching methods on the surface roughness and hardness of resin composites. J Dent Oral Hygiene 2011;3:10-17
18. Hafez R, Ahmed D, Yousry M, El-Badrawy W, El-Mowafy O. Effect of in-office bleaching on color and surface roughness of composite restoratives. Eur J Dent 2010;4:118-127
19. Sharafeddin F, Jamalipour G. Effects of 35% carbamide peroxide gel on surface roughness and hardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran)2010;7: 6-12
20. Pruthi G, Jain V, Kandpal HC, Mathur VP, Shah N. Effect of bleaching on color change and surface topography of composite restorations. Int J Dent 2010; 2010:695748. doi: 10.1155/2010/695748. Epub 2010 Dec 22
21. Zaki AA, Fahmy NZ. The effect of a bleaching system on properties related to different ceramic surface textures. J Prosthodont 2009;18:223-229
22. de A Silva MF, Davies RM, Stewart B, DeVizio W, Tonholo J, da Silva Júnior JG et al. Effect of whitening gels on the surface roughness of restorative materials in situ. Dent Mater 2006;22:919-924
23. Wattanapayungkul P, Yap AU. Effects of in-officebleaching products on surface finish oftooth-colored restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:15-19
24. Dogan A, Ozcelik S, Dogan OM, Hubbezoglu I, Cakmak M, Bolayir G. Effects of bleaching on roughness of dental composite resins. J Adhes 2008;84: 897-917
25. Rosentritt M, Lang R, Plein T, Behr M, Handel G. Discoloration of restorative materials after bleaching application. Quintessence Inter 2005; 36:33-39
26. Goharkhay K, Schoop U, Wernisch J, Hartl S, De Moor RT, Moritz A. Frequency doubled neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet and diode laser-activated power bleaching--pH, environmental scanning electron microscopy, and colorimetric in vitro evaluations. Lasers Med Sci 2009;24:339-346
27. Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E. Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:817-822
28. Yu H, Li Q, Cheng H, Wang Y. The effects of temperature and bleaching gels on the properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:100-107
29. Abu-Eittah MR, Mandour MH. In vitro study of the effect of three hydrogen peroxide concentrations on the corrosion behavior and surface topography of alumina-reinforced dental ceramic. J Prosthodont 2011; 20:541-552
30. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. Inter Dent J 1998;48:3-16

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tuncay Alptekın

Özgün Yusuf Özyılmaz ^*

Filiz Aykent

Haluk Barış Kara

Publication Date

December 22, 2017

Submission Date

June 16, 2016

Acceptance Date

March 28, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 20 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.369086

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97KT88JZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Alptekın T, Özyılmaz ÖY, Aykent F, Kara HB (December 1, 2017) EFFECT OF TWO ACTIVATED BLEACHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DIFFERENT ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 20 3 161–168.

Cited By

The effect of diode 980 nm laser-activated bleaching on surface roughness and color change in composite resin restorations (in vitro study)

Lasers in Dental Science

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-024-00266-w