Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Fabricated With Chairside CAD/CAM Systems

Laden Güleç

doi:10.7126/cumudj.298914

EN

Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Fabricated With Chairside CAD/CAM Systems

Abstract

Aesthetics has gained significant importance in restorative dentistry besides the potential requirements including the continuity and integrity of tissue and regaining the function and phonation. The demand for esthetic posterior restorations gave way to the use of resin composites in the posterior region as well as the anterior restorations. However, polymerization shrinkage of resin composites limits this application to only with small sized restorations. In order to eliminate the disadvantage of polymerization shrinkage, various methods have been suggested to improve the properties and application methods of resins with the aim of increasing the longevity and function of restorative materials. For this purpose, computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems have been used for the past 10 years to fabricate indirect restorations with resin composites as an alternative material in digital system. This review aims to provide an update on the resin composite materials used with indirect restorations and CAD/CAM systems.

Keywords

Chairside CAD/CAM Systems,Indirect Restoration,CAD/CAM Composite Resin,Composite Block

References

1. Ural Ç. Diş hekimliği pratiğinde tamamı seramik ve CAD/CAM uygulamaları. Dirim Tıp Gazetesi 2011; 86(1): 27-38.
2. Giardano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM–produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(9): 14-21.
3. Karaarslan EŞ, Ertaş E. İndirekt posterior kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2010; 10(3): 116-24.
4. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529–34.
5. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspect of CAD/CAM composite resin restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 273-75.
6. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93(12): 1232-4.
7. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29–38.
8. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. PPAD 2001; 13(1):51-8.

9. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri 2011.p: 504,505, 611, 614, 652.
10. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2005; 8(1):1-8.
21. Mörmann WH. The origin of the CEREC method: a personal review of the first 5 years. Int J Comput Dent 2004; 7(1):11-24.
22. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC2 CAD/CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(1): 47–53.
23. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505.
24. Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: An overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012; 33(1):50-8.
25. Batalha-Silva S, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Maia HP, Magne P. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 324-31.
26. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007; 35: 68-73.
27. Liu X, Fok A, Li H. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 327-33.
28. Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, Wegehaupt FJ, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive MOD cavities. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 579-87.
29. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R. Influence of proximal box evaluation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 1021-28.
30. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 545-54.
41. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2015; 34(4):495-502.
42. Telio. The compatible system solution for temporary restorations. (2014). (p.2-8). Access: 08.11.2015,http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zooluwebsite/media/document/28279/Telio+Chairside+System.
43. Wanner M. Scientific documentation of Telio CAD. (2010). (p. 2-11). Access: 19.10.2015, http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/products/chairside-cad_cam-blocks/telio-cad
44. VITA CAD-Temp Disc (p. 1-2). Access:16.10.2015, http://vitanorthamerica.com/wp content/uploads/2008/12/VITA-1806-Nr.-1806-VITA-CAD-Temp-DISC-en-Screen.pdf
45. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital Dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204(9): 505-11.
46. Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. JOI 2014; 7(3): 57–70.
47. Cerasmart: Force absorbing flexible nanoceramic CAD/CAM block. Access: 15.1.2016, http://www.gcamerica.com/lab/products/CERASMART/GCA_CERASMART_Bro-iPad.pdf
48. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y,Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2014; 33(5):705-10.
49. Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kanehira, Finger WJ. Quantitive wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 29: 508-16.
50. Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia P, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104:149-57.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Laden Güleç
Cyprus

Publication Date

March 24, 2017

Submission Date

March 3, 2016

Acceptance Date

October 6, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 19 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.298914

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA29UJ87XX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Güleç L (March 1, 2017) Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Fabricated With Chairside CAD/CAM Systems. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 19 3 247–255.

Cited By

Effect of cavity design and material type on fracture resistance and failure pattern of molars restored by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing inlays/onlays

Dental Research Journal

https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.311421

Indirect Resin Composite Restorations Fabricated With Chairside CAD/CAM Systems

Abstract

Keywords

Öz

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Effect of cavity design and material type on fracture resistance and failure pattern of molars restored by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing inlays/onlays