Laser Biostimulation of Free Gingival Grafts Around Dental Implants
Abstract
Objective: Long-term edentulousness causes big alterations in mandible such as keratinized tissue is reduced or lost and vestibular sulcus becomes too shallow. As a consequence, free gingival autograft is usually mandatory. The aim of this case report was to evaluate the effect of diode laser bio-stimulation on FGG procedure around dental implants in edentulous patients.
Material and Methods: Three edentulous female patients (59 and 64 and 79 years old) were referred to our department in different time periods. All patients had serious alveolar bone loss because of prolonged edentulism. In clinical and radiographical examinations, it is observed that patients had lack of keratinized tissue around 6 dental implants placed in mandibular canine positions. The healing caps had been placed and there were severe soft tissue problems and disorientations and also ulcerations around healing caps. Patients were really uncomfortable and in pain because of ulcerated mucosa. Conventional vestibuloplasty and gingivectomy procedures were performed in one patient. The problem continued, lips covered healing caps again and patient was suffering from the pain again. After then in order to reduce the pain and stimulate soft tissue healing, diode laser bio-stimulation were performed in all three patients along with the FGG procedure. Totally six FGG procedures were performed in three patients.
Results: Mild pain was observed in donor site and other than that there was no pain or discomfort in all patients. After 30 days, the keratinized tissues around dental implants were increased and the discomfort and pain were gone. Healing caps were placed again and the patients were treated successfully.
Conclusion: Diode laser bio-stimulation reduced the
post-surgical pain and discomfort caused by FGG procedure around dental
implants in elderly patients.
Keywords
References
- 1. Miller PD Jr. Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Mucogingival surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:287-306.
- 2. Consensus report. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:702‑6.
- 3. Muller HP, Eger T, Schorb A. Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue grafts. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:424-430.
- 4. Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival-augmentation surgery compared to untreated contralateral homologous sites: a 10- to 27-year long-term study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1399-1405.
- 5. Björn H. Free transplantation of gingiva propria. Sven Tandlaek Tidskr 1963;22:684-689.
- 6. Trey E, Bernimoulin JP. Influence of free gingival grafts on the health of the marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:381-393.
- 7. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:316-324.
- 8. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol 1982;53:349-352.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Case Report
Authors
Hatice Balcı Yüce
Türkiye
Publication Date
March 24, 2017
Submission Date
May 19, 2015
Acceptance Date
April 27, 2016
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 19 Number: 3