Research Article

Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study

Volume: 29 Number: 3 September 30, 2026
EN TR

Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the sealing ability of three different calcium silicate-based materials (MTA Angelus, Bio-C Repair, and TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty) in furcation perforation repair using spectrophotometric microleakage analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixty dentin discs, 2.5 mm thick, were prepared from extracted human maxillary molars. Standardized furcation perforations (1.6 mm diameter) were created and the specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20): Group 1, MTA Angelus; Group 2, Bio-C Repair; and Group 3, TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty. Following material placement and a 24-hour incubation period, microleakage was assessed using a 2% methylene blue dye penetration test for 48 hours. The specimens were dissolved in 65% nitric acid, and absorbance values were measured at 550 nm using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests with a significance level of p<0.05. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed among all groups (p<0.001). MTA Angelus demonstrated the lowest mean absorbance (0.255±0.100), indicating superior sealing performance. Among the premixed materials, TotalFill BC RRM Fast Set Putty (0.543±0.181) exhibited significantly lower microleakage compared to Bio-C Repair (0.725±0.209) (p=0.003). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, manually mixed MTA Angelus outperformed the premixed bioceramic alternatives in terms of sealing ability. The rapid setting time and handling characteristics of TotalFill BC RRM may provide better interfacial adaptation compared to Bio-C Repair.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

İzmir Katip Çelebi University

Project Number

2025-KDP-DİSF-0003

Ethical Statement

Health Research Ethics Committee of Kâtip Çelebi University, approval number: 2025/531

References

  1. 1. Clauder T, SHIN SJ. Repair of perforations with MTA: clinical applications and mechanisms of action. Endod Top 2006;15(1):32-55.
  2. 2. Elbahary S, Haj Yahya S, Koç C, Shemesh H, Rosen E, Tsesis I. Bacterial colonization and proliferation in furcal perforations repaired by different materials: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Appl Sci 2021;11(8):3403.
  3. 3. Alghamdi F, Aljahdali E. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate, endosequence root repair material, and Biodentine used for repairing root perforations: a systematic review. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2019;22(4):469-476.
  4. 4. Siew K, Lee AH, Cheung GS. Treatment outcome of repaired root perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015;41(11):1795-1804.
  5. 5. Shetty A, Sultana HA, Srirekha A, Champa C. Sealing ability of bioceramic furcation perforation repair materials–a systematic review. Endodontology 2025;37(1):10-15.
  6. 6. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair. J Conserv Dent 2013;16(5):462-465.
  7. 7. Mohan D, Kuriakose F, Malik R, Joy J, John D. Evaluation of sealing potential of different repair materials in furcation perforations using dye penetration: an in vitro study. T J Contemp Dent Pract 2021;22(1):80-83.
  8. 8. Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S. Root resorption–diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol 2003;19(4):175-182.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Endodontics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2026

Submission Date

February 25, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 27, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 29 Number: 3

APA
Kılıç, Y., & Tulgar, M. M. (2026). Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 29(3), 465-470. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1897052
AMA
1.Kılıç Y, Tulgar MM. Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2026;29(3):465-470. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1897052
Chicago
Kılıç, Yağmur, and Mustafa Mert Tulgar. 2026. “Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 29 (3): 465-70. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1897052.
EndNote
Kılıç Y, Tulgar MM (September 1, 2026) Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 29 3 465–470.
IEEE
[1]Y. Kılıç and M. M. Tulgar, “Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study”, Cumhuriyet Dent J, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 465–470, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.7126/cumudj.1897052.
ISNAD
Kılıç, Yağmur - Tulgar, Mustafa Mert. “Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 29/3 (September 1, 2026): 465-470. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1897052.
JAMA
1.Kılıç Y, Tulgar MM. Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2026;29:465–470.
MLA
Kılıç, Yağmur, and Mustafa Mert Tulgar. “Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 465-70, doi:10.7126/cumudj.1897052.
Vancouver
1.Yağmur Kılıç, Mustafa Mert Tulgar. Evaluation of Three Different Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Materials in Terms of Microleakage: In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2026 Sep. 1;29(3):465-70. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1897052

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.