Parental Knowledge and Awareness Regarding Children’s Teething
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate parents’ knowledge, beliefs and practices concerning teething in children aged 0–4 years, and to determine how these are influenced by sociodemographic factors. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 416 parents attending a paediatric dentistry clinic. Data were obtained via a 17-item structured questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, perceived teething symptoms, management strategies, information sources and overall knowledge. Statistical analyses included Pearson’s chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, Yates’ continuity correction and Bonferroni-adjusted z-tests (p<0.05). Results: The most frequently reported symptoms were biting (95.0%), gingival itching (92.3%), irritability (90.1%), drooling (81.0%) and loss of appetite (80.5%). Mothers reported fever (p = 0.003) and appetite loss (p = 0.004) more frequently, whereas fathers more commonly observed biting behaviour (p = 0.025). The most frequently used management strategies were teething rings (78.4%), gingival massage with firm fruits or vegetables (59.9%) and teething gels (38.0%). Higher educational status was significantly associated with the use of cold applications and evidence-based information sources, while lower educational status correlated with reliance on social media and advice from relatives (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Parental knowledge of teething was generally adequate; however, persistent misconceptions—particularly the attribution of systemic symptoms to teething and the use of unnecessary or potentially harmful interventions—were identified. Education level and gender emerged as the primary factors influencing symptom perception and management choices. Brief, evidence-based guidance delivered during routine paediatric or dental appointments may support safer symptom management, reduce inappropriate practices and facilitate earlier recognition of systemic conditions.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. More SG, Sankeshwari R, Ankola AV. Exploring parental knowledge and indigenous practices for infant teething in Indian population: a cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12:479-484.
- 2. HajiAhmadi M, Akhlaghi N, Aghajani F, Moshgelgosha H, Soltanian M. Comparison of information provided by pediatricians regarding tooth eruption and the information available on the internet. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021;18:6.
- 3. Memarpour M, Soltanimehr E, Eskandarian T. Signs and symptoms associated with primary tooth eruption: a clinical trial of nonpharmacological remedies. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:88.
- 4. Massignan C, Cardoso M, Porporatti AL, Aydinoz S, Canto Gde L, Mezzomo LA, et al. Signs and symptoms of primary tooth eruption: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016;137(3): e20153501.
- 5. Ramos-Jorge J, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM. Prospective longitudinal study of signs and symptoms associated with primary tooth eruption. Pediatrics 2011;128(3):471-476.
- 6. Anderson JE. Nothing but the tooth: dispelling myths about teething. Contemp Pediatr 2004;21(7):75-83.
- 7. Owotade FJ, Folayan MO, Esan TA, Oziegbe EO, Adekoya-Sofowora CA. Teething problems and parental beliefs in Nigeria. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;10:75-82.
- 8. Elbur AI, Yousif M, Albarraq AA, Abdallah MA. Parental knowledge and practices on infant teething, Taif, Saudi Arabia. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:699.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Paedodontics
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
July 1, 2026
Submission Date
October 22, 2025
Acceptance Date
December 3, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 29 Number: 2