Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

CORRELATION BETWEEN GLOSS AND ROUGHNESS OF LOW VISCOSITY BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESINS

Year 2026, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 26 - 31, 27.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1737244
https://izlik.org/JA39AY79XA

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the correlation between gloss and roughness in low-viscosity bulk fill composite resins.
Materials and methods: The study had an experimental, analytical, prospective, and cross-sectional design, with a sample of 60 blocks of low-viscosity resins distributed into three groups of 20 units each: Group 1—3M Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF), Group 2—Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS (OBF), Group 3—Opalis Flow (OF) (Control). Gloss and roughness were measured using a gloss meter and a contact roughness meter. In the descriptive analysis, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated. The normality of the data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the comparison of roughness between resins, the ANOVA test was applied, and for gloss, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied, both with Tukey and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Figner post-hoc tests, respectively. The relationship between variables was measured using Pearson and Spearman correlations. The data were processed using the SPSS statistical package, considering a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The FBF resin had the highest average roughness, while OF had the lowest value; in addition, OF had the highest gloss values. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant high negative correlation between roughness and gloss (p<0.01).
Conclusions: There was an inverse relationship between roughness and gloss regardless of the type of resin evaluated.

Project Number

016-2025-CRPI-FO-USMP

References

  • 1. Chapman RJ, Nathanson D. Excessive wear of natural tooth structure by opposing composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:51-53.
  • 2. Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE. Wear measurements in clinical studies of composite resin restorations in the posterior region: a review. ASDC J Dent Child 1991;58:109-123.
  • 3. Pirmoradian M, Hooshmand T, Jafari-Semnani S, Fadavi F. Degree of conversion and microhardness of bulk-fill dental composites polymerized by LED and QTH light curing units. J Oral Biosci 2020;62:107-113.
  • 4. Schneider LFJ, Pfeifer CSC, Consani S, Prahl SA, Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:1169-1177.
  • 5. Daugherty MM, Lien W, Mansell MR, Risk DL, Savett DA, Vandewalle KS. Effect of high-intensity curing lights on the polymerization of bulk-fill composites. Dent Mater 2018;34:1531-1541.
  • 6. Rezaei S, Abbasi M, Sadeghi Mahounak F, Moradi Z. Curing depth and degree of conversion of five bulk-fill composite resins compared to a conventional composite. Open Dent J 2020;13:13-422.
  • 7. Fronza BM, Abuna GF, Braga RR, Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M. Effect of composite polymerization stress and placement technique on dentin micropermeability of class I restorations. J Adhes Dent 2018;20:335-363.
  • 8. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent 2017;19: 95-109.
  • 9. Miletic V. Dental composite for direct restorations. 1ª ed. Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  • 10. Hasani E, Panahandeh N, Shamszadeh S, Abrandabadi AN, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM. Hygroscopic expansion of bulk fill composites: a three-month report. Braz Dent Sci 2018;21:172-176
  • 11. Canali GD, Ignácio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:889-897.
  • 12. Engelhardt F, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2123-2130.
  • 13. Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G, Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent 2005;18:95-100.
  • 14. Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing. Oper Dent 2007;32:347-355.
  • 15. Zimmerli B, Lussi A, Flury S. Operator variability using different polishing methods and surface geometry of a nanohybrid composite. Oper Dent 2011;36:52-59.
  • 16. Lefever D, Perakis N, Roig M, Krejci I, Ardu S. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am J Dent 2012;25:54-58.
  • 17. Van Dijken JWV, Ruyter IE. Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45:337-346.
  • 18. Soliman HAN, Elkholany NR, Hamama HH, El-Sharkawy FM, Mahmoud SH, Comisi JC. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of novel nanohybrid resin composites. Eur J Dent 2021;15:259-265.
  • 19. Zhang L, Yu P, Wang XY. Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites. J Dent Sci 2021;16:1198-1203.
  • 20. da Costa JB, Ferracane JL, Amaya-Pajares S, Pfefferkorn F. Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2021;152:385-392.
  • 21. Altınışık H, Özyurt E. Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:1391.
  • 22. Gaviria-Martinez A, Castro-Ramirez L, Ladera-Castañeda M, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Cachay-Criado H, Alvino-Vales M, et al. Surface roughness and oxygen inhibited layer control in bulk-fill and conventional nanohybrid resin composites with and without polishing: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:258.
  • 23. Picón Rentería AD, Tamariz Ordóñez PE. Efectividad de los diferentes sistemas de pulido sobre la rugosidad superficial de las resinas compuestas. Revisión bibliográfica. Rev Odontol 2023;26:67-74.
  • 24. Biçer Z, Yaman BC, Çeliksöz Ö, Tepe H. Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:876.
  • 25. Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: a in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2019;9:154-158.
  • 26. Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Ersöz B. Superficial effects of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of resin-based CAD/CAM blocks. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021;23:87-97.
  • 27. Mizutani K, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Shibasaki S, Kurokawa H, Suzuki M, et al. Flexural properties and polished surface characteristics of a structural colored resin composite. Oper Dent 2021;4:117-131.
  • 28. Nithya K, Sridevi K, Keerthi V, Ravishankar, P. Evaluation of surface roughness, hardness, and gloss of composites after three different finishing and polishing techniques: an in vitro study. Cureus 2020;12:7037.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dental Materials
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ingridh Soledad Giraldo Antunez 0009-0006-8437-8749

Grace Alexandra Diaz Llerena 0009-0001-0742-8611

Eduardo Quea-cahuana 0000-0001-7893-3845

Lilia Inés Mori-guerrero 0000-0002-3882-5572

Silvana Anduaga-lescano 0000-0001-7154-2921

Carlos Cava-vergiu 0000-0003-0338-3425

Project Number 016-2025-CRPI-FO-USMP
Submission Date July 9, 2025
Acceptance Date January 26, 2026
Publication Date March 27, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1737244
IZ https://izlik.org/JA39AY79XA
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 29 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Giraldo Antunez IS, Diaz Llerena GA, Quea-cahuana E, Mori-guerrero LI, Anduaga-lescano S, Cava-vergiu C (March 1, 2026) CORRELATION BETWEEN GLOSS AND ROUGHNESS OF LOW VISCOSITY BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESINS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 29 1 26–31.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.