Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures

Işıl Buyukhatipoglu; Melek Özdemir

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1378172

TR EN

İmplant destekli sabit bölümlü protez tedavisi yapılan hastalarında yaşam kalitesi ve memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ağız sağlığı etki ölçeği olan OHIP-14 (oral health impact profile-14) ve VAS skalası kullanılarak hastaların 5-8 yıllık tedavi süresinden sonraki memnuniyeti değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Uluslararası Oral İmplantoloji Konsensus Kongresi (ICOI) tarafından kabul edilen dental implant sağlığı ölçeğine göre toplam 185 adet sağlıklı implant seçildi ve 112 adet implant üstü sabit destekli protez değerlendirildi. Hasta tarafından bildirilen sonuçlar, 5 ila 8 yıl arasında değişen bir takip süresiyle ağız sağlığı profili (OHIP-14) ve VAS sonuçları prospektif olarak elde edildi. Değişkenlerin dağılımı 0ne-Sample testi kullanılarak kontrol edildi. Analizlerde SPSS 22.0 programı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastalarda implant yerleştirilmesinden 5-8 yıl sonra yüksek memnuniyet sonuçları belirlendi. İmplant destekli restorasyonlardan memnuniyet yüzdesine ilişkin ortalama VAS skoru % 87, 80 (SD ± 13,79) idi. Ortalama OHIP skoru 2,82 (SS ± 5,44) idi. OHIP 14 ve VAS skorları sonuçlarına göre sabit implant destekli protezlerden hasta memnuniyetinin tüm hastalarda yüksek olduğu görüldü. Sonuçlar: Sabit implant destekli restorasyonlar OHIP 14 ve VAS sonuçlarına göre yüksek memnuniyet sonuçları vermiştir. Bu restorasyonların ağız sağlığı açısından yaşam kalitesi (OHRQoL) üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi vardır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Bölümlü; dental implant; sabit; protez; yaşam kalitesi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the satisfaction of the patients using the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and VAS scale after 5-8 years of the treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of healthy 185 implants were selected according to the dental implant health scale accepted by International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus (ICOI) and 112 fixed implant- supported prosthesis evaluated for this study. The patient-reported effect was prospectively obtained by measuring oral health impact (OHIP-14) and VAS skale with a a follow-up period ranging from 5 to 8 years. Distribution of variables was checked using 0ne-Sample test. SPSS 22.0 programme was used for the analyses. Results: The patients were defined high satisfaction results after 5-8 years by implant placement. Mean VAS-score for the satisfaction percentage with implant-supported restorations was 87.80 % (SD ± 13.79). Mean OHIP score was 2.82 (SD ± 5.44). The results of OHIP 14 and VAS scores resulted that patient satisfaction with fixed implant supported prosthesis was high in all patients. Conclusions: The fixed implant-supported restorations served high satisfaction results according to the OHIP 14 and VAS results. These restorations has a positive effect to the quality of life for oral health (OHRQoL). Key Words: Quality of life; dental implant; denture ; partial; fixed

Keywords

References

1. Loza-Herrero MA, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Morou-Bermudez E. Success and complications of implant-retained prostheses provided by the post-doc- toral prosthodontics program, University of Puerto Rico: A cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(5):637–643.
2. Gervais MJ, Wilson PR. A rationale for retrievability of fixed, implant-supported prostheses: a complication-based analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(1):13-24.
3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
4. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:517-521.
5. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(1):5-15.
6. Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):201-237.
7. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25(4):284-90
8. Strassburger C, Heydecke G, Kerschbaum T. Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part 1--Characteristics of the studies. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(1):83-93.

9. Geiballa GH, Abubakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Patients' satisfaction and maintenance of fixed partial denture. Eur J Dent 2016;10(2):250-253.
10. Preciado A, Del Río J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. Impact of various screwed implant prostheses on oral health-related quality of life as measured with the QoLIP-10 and OHIP-14 scales: a cross-sectional study. J Dent 2013;41(12):1196-1207.
11. Renvert S, Hirooka H, Polyzois I, Kelekis-Cholakis A, Wang HL; Working Group 3. Diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases and maintenance care of patients with dental implants-Consensus report of working group 3. Int Dent J. 2019;69:12-17.
12. Lee K, Dam C, Huh J, Park KM, Kim SY, Park W. Distribution of medical status and medications in elderly patients treated with dental implant surgery covered by national healthcare insurance in Korea. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017;17(2):113-119.
13. Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, Ikiz K, Gunes M, Islek U, Yavuz S, Sur H, Atalay T, Direskeneli H. Oral health related quality of life is affected by disease activity in Behçet's disease. Oral Dis 2006;12(2):145-151.
14. Oh SH, Kim Y, Park JY, Jung YJ, Kim SK, Park SY. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):31-37.
15. Chochlidakis K, Einarsdottir E, Tsigarida A, Papaspyridakos P, Romeo D, Barmak AB, et al. Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: an up to 5-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124: 539–546.
16. Nikellis T, Lampraki E, Romeo D, Tsigarida A, Barmak AB, Malamou C, Ercoli C, Papaspyridakos P, Kotsailidi EA, Chochlidakis K. Survival rates, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 12-month prospective study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(3):214-220.
17. Sailer I, Barbato L, Mojon P, Pagliaro U, Serni L, Karasan D, Cairo F. Single and partial tooth replacement with fixed dental prostheses supported by dental implants: A systematic review of outcomes and outcome measures used in clinical trials in the last 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34 Suppl 25:22-37.
18. Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(2):174-195.
19. Zarauz C, Pitta J, Pradies G, Sailer I. Clinical Recommendations for Implant Abutment Selection for Single-Implant Reconstructions: Customized vs Standardized Ceramic and Metallic Solutions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020;40(1):31-37.
20. Castillo-Oyagüe R, Río-Highsmith JD, Preciado-Uribe A, Lynch CD, García-Minguillán G. Role of the modulating factors on the self-perceived OHRQoL of fully dentate subjects and wearers of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported FPDs: A cross-sectional study. J Dent. 2022;117:103887.
21. Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, Slade A, Chan AW, King MT; the SPIRIT-PRO Group; Hunn A, Bottomley A, Regnault A, Chan AW, Ells C, O'Connor D, Revicki D, Patrick D, Altman D, Basch E, Velikova G, Price G, Draper H, Blazeby J, Scott J, Coast J, Norquist J, Brown J, Haywood K, Johnson LL, Campbell L, Frank L, von Hildebrand M, Brundage M, Palmer M, Kluetz P, Stephens R, Golub RM, Mitchell S, Groves T. Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension. JAMA 2018;319(5):483-494.
22. Wyrwich KW, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Acaster S. Industry Advisory Committee of International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL). Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(3):475-483.
23. Tonetti M, Palmer R. Clinical research in implant dentistry: study design, reporting and outcome measurements: consensus report of Working Group 2 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39 Suppl 12:73-80.
24. Wang Y, Bäumer D, Ozga AK, Körner G, Bäumer A. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement. BMC Oral Health 2021;14: 21(1):30.
25. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brägger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(2):185-193.
26. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2010;21(7):772–777.
27. Filius MAP, Vissink A, Cune MS, Raghoebar GM, Visser A. Long-term implant performance and patients' satisfaction in oligodontia. J Dent 2018; 71:18-24
28. John MT, LeResche L, Koepsell TD, Hujoel P, Miglioretti DL, Micheelis W. Oral health-related quality of life in Germany. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111(6):483-491.
29. Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Patients’ expectations to dental implant: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:153

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Oral Implantology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Işıl Buyukhatipoglu ^*
0000-0001-7519-2324
Türkiye

Melek Özdemir
0000-0002-0311-4703
Türkiye

Publication Date

February 16, 2024

Submission Date

October 18, 2023

Acceptance Date

January 29, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 27 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1378172

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27FS79DX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Buyukhatipoglu I, Özdemir M (February 1, 2024) Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 27 1 15–20.

Cited By

Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Selcuk Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1456288