Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin
Abstract
Keywords
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- 1. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of sulphide methacrylate materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 9-20.
- 2. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000.
- 3. Panchal AC, Asthana G. Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. J Conserv Dent. 2020; 23: 254-258.
- 4. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 316-323.
- 5. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self‐adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 295-314.
- 6. Cotes C, Cardoso M, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 71-78.
- 7. Chen KK, Chen JH, Wu JH, Du JK. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty four hours. J Dent Sci. 2021; 16: 877-884.
- 8. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 41-49.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Dental Materials
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Abhishek Parolia
0000-0002-3364-6743
United States
Publication Date
June 30, 2024
Submission Date
October 15, 2023
Acceptance Date
April 19, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 27 Number: 2