EN
EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study evaluated the marginal adaptation and microleakage of the İn-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse press all-ceramic porcelain systems.
Material and methods: Thirty maxillary Central teeth extracted for periodontal reasons without caries and cracks were divided equally into three group and there was no control group; only the three systems were compared. Sample teeth cemented were stored in distile water for 24 hours. Then, they were applied to a repeated thermal cycle for 500 times. The samples were left in %5 of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. For the marginal adaptation rankings, all of the sample teeth for which cross-sections were made were moved into the metal microscope (Scherr Turico St. James/ Minn./ USA) and the marginal adaptation degrees were measured in both the palatinal and vestibul regions by measuring twice with x10 enlargement at micron level. For the statistical evaluations of marginal adaptation and microleakage values, Kruskal Wallis test has been used (p>0.05). Results: The differences between the three all-ceramic porcelain systems are not significant (p>0.05), α=0.05).
Conclusion: The Finesse porcelain system caused the least leakage in both regions. In second place in both regions was In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia caused the most leakage in both regions. The biggest margin gap in the palatal region was seen in the Finesse porcelain system, In-Ceram Zirconia in second place. The least marginal gap was caused by the In- Ceram Alumina porcelain system.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
This investigation was supported by CUBAP grant No:Dis 04, (Cumhuriyet University Research Fund Sivas -TURKEY)
Project Number
Diş:04
References
- REFERENCES 1. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
- 2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentİstry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32.
- 3. Davis DR. Comparison of adaptation of two types of alt ceramic crowm. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-16.
- 4. Sulatman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, VVozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478- 484.
- 5. Participants of CSP No. 147/242, Morris, HF: Department of veterans affairs Cooperative Studies Project No. 242. Quantitave and qualitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:198-204.
- 6. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal adaptation of porcelain fussed to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.
- 7. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-590.
- 8. Taylor M, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 30, 2022
Submission Date
April 14, 2022
Acceptance Date
May 13, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 25 Number: 2
EndNote
Coşkun A, Yaluğ S (June 1, 2022) EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 2 131–136.