Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yumuşak Astar Materyallerinin Dental Kaide ile Olan Bağlantısı: Meta Analizi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 419 - 423, 21.08.2023
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1156304

Öz

Amaç: Geniş bir kullanım endikasyonu bulunan yumuşak astar materyallerinin en büyük dezavantajlarından biri zamanla deforme olması ve protez kaidesi ile olan bağlantıda kopma ve kırılmalara yol açmasıdır. Bağlantıdaki bu kopma ve kırılmalar klinik açıdan sorun teşkil etmektedir. Bu sorunların üstesinden gelebilmek için yumuşak astar materyalleri ve protetik kaide arasındaki bağlantıyı zayıflatan faktörler belirlenmeli ve buna göre önlemler alınmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yumuşak astar materyallerinin protez kaidesine bağlantısını etkileyen faktörleri, dental kaide ve yumuşak astar materyallerinin çeşidi, yüzey işlemleri ve retansiyon ajanları açısından aydınlatmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: ‘Yumuşak astar materyalleri, dental kaide, bağlanma dayanımı’ anahtar sözcükleri yazılarak Pubmed/Medline veritabanları kullanılarak tarama yapılmış ve bunun sonucunda mevcut çalışma ile alakalı 54 araştırma makalesi değerlendirilmiştir. Her bir makale dental kaide ve yumuşak astar materyalinin çeşidi, yüzey işlemleri, retansiyon ajanları ve bağlanma dayanımı türü bakımından sınıflandırıldı. Bağlanma dayanımı ise kendi arasında kesme, çekme ve soyulma bağlanma dayanımı olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı.
Bulgular: Tükürük ve su banyosunda bekletme, herhangi bir retansiyon ajanı uygulanmayan grup ile karşılaştırıldığında kesme bağlanma dayanımını azaltırken, temizleme ajanlarının uygulanması kesme bağlanma dayanımını arttırmıştır. Çekme bağlanma dayanımı, yüzey işlemlerine göre değişiklik göstermiş olup lazer uygulaması en yüksek çekme bağlanma dayanımı sergilemiştir. Soyulma dayanımı bakımından ise, ısıl işlem uygulanan grup ile lazer ve kimyasal maddeler uygulanan grup, mekanik işlem ve suda bekletilen gruba göre daha düşük bağlanma dayanımı göstermiştir.
Sonuç: Temizleyici ajanların, lazer uygulamasının ve mekanik işlemlerin çekme, kesme ve soyulma dayanımını artırdığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Mack PJ. Denture Soft Lining Materials: Clinical İndications. Aust Dent J. 1989;34(5):454-8.
  • 2. Nikawa H, Iwanaga H, Hamada T, Yuhta S. Effects of Denture Cleansers on Direct Soft Denture Lining Materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(6):657-62.
  • 3. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 9th ed. Mosby: St Louis, 1993.
  • 4. Dootz E, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical Property Comparison of 11 Soft Denture Lining Materials as A Function of Accelerated Aging. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(1):114-9.
  • 5. McCabe JF, Walls AW. Applied Dental Materials. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • 6. Zaki HS, Ketzan KJ, Carrau RL. Hypersensitivity to Temporary Soft Denture Liners: A Clinical Report. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(1):1-3.
  • 7. Kutay Ö. Recent Developments on Soft Denture Liners. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 1990;24(2):70-4.
  • 8. Kawano F, Kon M, Koran A, Matsumoto N. Shock-Absorbing Behavior of Four Processed Soft Denture Liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(6):599-605.
  • 9. Wright P. The Success and Failure of Denture Soft-Lining Materials in Clinical Use. J Dent. 1984;12(4):319-27.
  • 10. Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials.“2nd Ed.”. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier Science Limited, 2002.
  • 11. Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Soft Denture Lining Materials. Atatürk Univ Fac Dent J. 2006;Suppl 1:53-60.
  • 12. Braden M, Clarke RL, Nicholson J, Parker S. Polymeric Dental Materials. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  • 13. Doğan OM. Denture Soft Lining Materials. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Fac Dent J. 2006;7(3):209-15.
  • 14. Hayakawa I, Kawae M, Tsuji Y, Masuhara E. Soft Denture Liner of Fluoroethylene Copolymer and Its Clinical Evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(3):310-3.
  • 15. Doğan OM. Clinical Indications of Soft Lining Materials. Atatürk Univ Fac Dent J. 2005;2005(1):70-5.
  • 16. Parker S, Braden M. Soft Prosthesis Materials Based on Powdered Elastomers. Biomater. 1990;11(7):482-90.
  • 17. Wright P. Characterization of The Rupture Properties of Denture Soft Lining Materials. J Dent Res. 1980;59(3):614-9.
  • 18. El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative Study of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Tensile Bond Strength of Two Soft Lining Materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(3):356-61.
  • 19. Al‐Athel M, Jagger R, Jagger D. Effect of Ageing on The Bond Strength of A Permanent Denture Soft Lining Material. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(10):992-6.
  • 20. Alaa’a MS. Effect of Aging on Bond Strength of Two Soft Lining Materials to A Denture Base Polymer. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(1):155-60.
  • 21. Mahboub F, Salehsaber F, Parnia F, Gharekhani V, Kananizadeh Y, Taghizadeh M. Effect of Denture Cleansing Agents on Tensile And Shear Bond Strengths of Soft Liners to Acrylic Denture Base. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017;11(3):183.
  • 22. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liner. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(6):783-8.
  • 23. Delfino CS, Souza‐Zaroni WC, Corona SAM, Palma‐Dibb RG. Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Human Enamel Prepared Using Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(2):475-9.
  • 24. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin GE, Ozdemir AK. Strength of The Bond Between A Silicone Lining Material and Denture Resin After Er: YAG Laser Treatments with Different Pulse Durations and Levels of Energy. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):281-5.
  • 25. Akin H, Tugut F, Guney U, Kirmali O, Akar T. Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liner to Two Chemically Different Denture Base Resins After Various Surface Treatments. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):119-23.
  • 26. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and Sandblasted Denture Base Surface Preparations Affecting Resilient Liner Bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(2):153-8.
  • 27. Amin W, Fletcher A, Ritchie G. The Nature of The İnterface Between Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Materials and Soft Lining Materials. J Dent. 1981;9(4):336-46.
  • 28. Alcântara CS, de Macêdo AF, Gurgel BC, Jorge JH, Neppelenbroek KH, Urban VM. Peel Bond Strength of Resilient Liner Modified by The Addition of Antimicrobial Agents to Denture Base Acrylic Resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(6):607-12.
  • 29. Sanchez-Aliaga A, Pellissari CVG, Arrais CAG, Michel MD, Neppelenbroek KH, Urban VM. Peel Bond Strength of Soft Lining Materials with Antifungal to A Denture Base Acrylic Resin. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):194-203.

The Bonding of Soft Lining Materials to The Denture Base: Meta-Analysis

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 419 - 423, 21.08.2023
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1156304

Öz

Background: One of the biggest disadvantages of soft lining materials is that they deform over time and cause ruptures and fractures in the bonding with the denture base. To overcome these problems, the factors that weaken the bonding should be determined and measures should be taken accordingly. The aim of this study is to elucidate the factors affecting the bonding of soft lining materials to the denture base, in terms of dental base and soft lining materials, surface treatments and retention agents.
Methods: The keywords 'soft lining materials, dental base, bond strength' were written and searched using PubMed/Medline databases, and as a result, 54 research articles related to the current study were evaluated. Each article was classified in terms of the type of denture base and soft lining material, methods of surface treatment, retention agents, and bond strength.
Results: While retention in saliva and water bathing decreased the shear bond strength compared to the group without any retention agent, the application of cleaning agents increased the shear bond strength. The tensile bond strength varied according to the surface treatments, and the laser application showed the highest tensile bond strength. In terms of peel strength, the heat-treated group and the laser with chemical treatment applied group showed lower bond strength than the mechanical treatment and soaked group.
Conclusion: It was concluded that cleaning agents, laser application and mechanical treatments increased the tensile, shear and peel strength.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Mack PJ. Denture Soft Lining Materials: Clinical İndications. Aust Dent J. 1989;34(5):454-8.
  • 2. Nikawa H, Iwanaga H, Hamada T, Yuhta S. Effects of Denture Cleansers on Direct Soft Denture Lining Materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(6):657-62.
  • 3. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 9th ed. Mosby: St Louis, 1993.
  • 4. Dootz E, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical Property Comparison of 11 Soft Denture Lining Materials as A Function of Accelerated Aging. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(1):114-9.
  • 5. McCabe JF, Walls AW. Applied Dental Materials. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • 6. Zaki HS, Ketzan KJ, Carrau RL. Hypersensitivity to Temporary Soft Denture Liners: A Clinical Report. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(1):1-3.
  • 7. Kutay Ö. Recent Developments on Soft Denture Liners. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 1990;24(2):70-4.
  • 8. Kawano F, Kon M, Koran A, Matsumoto N. Shock-Absorbing Behavior of Four Processed Soft Denture Liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(6):599-605.
  • 9. Wright P. The Success and Failure of Denture Soft-Lining Materials in Clinical Use. J Dent. 1984;12(4):319-27.
  • 10. Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials.“2nd Ed.”. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier Science Limited, 2002.
  • 11. Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Soft Denture Lining Materials. Atatürk Univ Fac Dent J. 2006;Suppl 1:53-60.
  • 12. Braden M, Clarke RL, Nicholson J, Parker S. Polymeric Dental Materials. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  • 13. Doğan OM. Denture Soft Lining Materials. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Fac Dent J. 2006;7(3):209-15.
  • 14. Hayakawa I, Kawae M, Tsuji Y, Masuhara E. Soft Denture Liner of Fluoroethylene Copolymer and Its Clinical Evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(3):310-3.
  • 15. Doğan OM. Clinical Indications of Soft Lining Materials. Atatürk Univ Fac Dent J. 2005;2005(1):70-5.
  • 16. Parker S, Braden M. Soft Prosthesis Materials Based on Powdered Elastomers. Biomater. 1990;11(7):482-90.
  • 17. Wright P. Characterization of The Rupture Properties of Denture Soft Lining Materials. J Dent Res. 1980;59(3):614-9.
  • 18. El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative Study of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Tensile Bond Strength of Two Soft Lining Materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(3):356-61.
  • 19. Al‐Athel M, Jagger R, Jagger D. Effect of Ageing on The Bond Strength of A Permanent Denture Soft Lining Material. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(10):992-6.
  • 20. Alaa’a MS. Effect of Aging on Bond Strength of Two Soft Lining Materials to A Denture Base Polymer. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(1):155-60.
  • 21. Mahboub F, Salehsaber F, Parnia F, Gharekhani V, Kananizadeh Y, Taghizadeh M. Effect of Denture Cleansing Agents on Tensile And Shear Bond Strengths of Soft Liners to Acrylic Denture Base. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017;11(3):183.
  • 22. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liner. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(6):783-8.
  • 23. Delfino CS, Souza‐Zaroni WC, Corona SAM, Palma‐Dibb RG. Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Human Enamel Prepared Using Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(2):475-9.
  • 24. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin GE, Ozdemir AK. Strength of The Bond Between A Silicone Lining Material and Denture Resin After Er: YAG Laser Treatments with Different Pulse Durations and Levels of Energy. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):281-5.
  • 25. Akin H, Tugut F, Guney U, Kirmali O, Akar T. Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liner to Two Chemically Different Denture Base Resins After Various Surface Treatments. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):119-23.
  • 26. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and Sandblasted Denture Base Surface Preparations Affecting Resilient Liner Bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(2):153-8.
  • 27. Amin W, Fletcher A, Ritchie G. The Nature of The İnterface Between Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Materials and Soft Lining Materials. J Dent. 1981;9(4):336-46.
  • 28. Alcântara CS, de Macêdo AF, Gurgel BC, Jorge JH, Neppelenbroek KH, Urban VM. Peel Bond Strength of Resilient Liner Modified by The Addition of Antimicrobial Agents to Denture Base Acrylic Resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(6):607-12.
  • 29. Sanchez-Aliaga A, Pellissari CVG, Arrais CAG, Michel MD, Neppelenbroek KH, Urban VM. Peel Bond Strength of Soft Lining Materials with Antifungal to A Denture Base Acrylic Resin. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):194-203.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm Araştırma
Yazarlar

Büşra Tosun 0000-0003-3145-4454

Nuran Yanıkoğlu 0000-0001-7677-1248

Yayımlanma Tarihi 21 Ağustos 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Ağustos 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Tosun B, Yanıkoğlu N. The Bonding of Soft Lining Materials to The Denture Base: Meta-Analysis. Selcuk Dent J. 2023;10(2):419-23.