Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2020,
Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 466 - 470, 27.12.2020
Öz
Kaynakça
- Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;136:16. e1-e4.
- Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013;144:831-7.
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
- Bell A, Ayoub A, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;219-23.
- Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:346-52.
- Akyalcin S. Are digital models replacing plaster casts. Dentistry 2011;1:e102.
- Sousa MVS, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012;142:269-73.
- Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
- Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:589-95.
- Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer Jr JR. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7.
- Pani SC, Hegde A. Impressions in cleft lip and palate–A novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
- Favero L, Terrazzani C, Favero V, Stellini E, Cocilovo F. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems. Progress in orthodontics 2009;10:16-25.
- Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
- Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:431-4.
- Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129:794-803.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH. 2003 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 1. Trends. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:545-53.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, VOGELS III DS. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Age (years) 2008;42:625-40.
- Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:83-90.
- Shastry S, Park JH. Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. Angle Orthod 2013;84:62-7.
Yıl 2020,
Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 466 - 470, 27.12.2020
Öz
Amaç: Bu anket çalışmasının amacı ülkemizde özel klinik, üniversite ya da devlet kurumunda çalışan ortodonti doktoru/uzmanı ve uzmanlık/doktora öğrencilerinin dijital ortodontik model kullanım yaygınlığını, bilgilerini ve tecrübelerini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Türkiye'de çalışan 740 ortodonti uzmanı, doktora ve uzmanlık öğrencisine 20 sorudan oluşan bir anket gönderilmiştir. Mail yoluyla ve kongre, sempozyum ve toplantılarda 388 kişiye anket uygulanmıştır. Anket, demografik özellikler ve klinik özellikleri, dijital modele yönelik tutumları ve dijital model ile ilgili bölümlerden oluşmaktadır.
Bulgular: 388 anketten elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Yanıt verenlerin yaş ortalaması 30 yıldır (dağılım: 23-55 yıl). Tüm prosedürler için 204 ortodontist (% 52.6) dijital modeli tercih etmiş, % 19.6'sı seminerlerden dijital model hakkında bilgi sahibi olduklarını bildirmiştir. Dijital modellerin kullanımında en sık belirtilen nedenler model kaybının ve model hasarının olmaması (% 44.8), ardından dijital görüntü üzerinde ölçüm yapabilmesidir (% 31.4). 300 ortodontist (% 77.3) dijital model hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinme isteğindedir.
Sonuç: Verilerimiz dijital modelin ortodontistler tarafından yaygın olarak kullanıldığını göstermektedir; ortodontik tanı için dijital model tercihi, daha büyük teknik yetkinlik ile orantılı olarak artacaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;136:16. e1-e4.
- Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013;144:831-7.
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
- Bell A, Ayoub A, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;219-23.
- Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:346-52.
- Akyalcin S. Are digital models replacing plaster casts. Dentistry 2011;1:e102.
- Sousa MVS, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012;142:269-73.
- Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
- Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:589-95.
- Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer Jr JR. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7.
- Pani SC, Hegde A. Impressions in cleft lip and palate–A novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
- Favero L, Terrazzani C, Favero V, Stellini E, Cocilovo F. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems. Progress in orthodontics 2009;10:16-25.
- Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
- Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:431-4.
- Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129:794-803.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH. 2003 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 1. Trends. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:545-53.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, VOGELS III DS. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Age (years) 2008;42:625-40.
- Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:83-90.
- Shastry S, Park JH. Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. Angle Orthod 2013;84:62-7.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Diş Hekimliği |
| Bölüm | Araştırma |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 27 Aralık 2020 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 12 Şubat 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 |
Selcuk Dental Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.