Evaluation of the Effect of Different Bonding Systems and Restorative Materials on Shear Bond Strength in the Repair of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
Öz
Aim: High viscosity glass ionomer cements have been produced to increase the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. The aim of this study is to determine the appropriate adhesive system and restorative material that can be used in fracture repair of high viscosity glass ionomer cements.
Material and Methods: A total of 140 standard size acrylic blocks were used in the study. 14 groups were formed from randomly selected acrylic blocks, with 10 samples in each group. High viscosity glass iomomer cement was placed in the first 13 groups, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement was placed in the last group. After the thermal cycle aging process was applied to all samples, repair restorations were performed with 4 different adhesive systems, 2 different composite resins and 2 different restorative types of glass ionomer cement. After the repair restorations, thermal cycle aging was applied again and the shear bond strengths were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The highest shear bond strength values were obtained by the total etch adhesive system (p<0.001). The lowest shear bond strength values were obtained when high-viscosity glass-iomomer cement without adhesive system was restored with high-viscosity glass iomomer cement (p<0.001).
Conclusion: For higher shear bond strength values in the repair of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements should use to total etch adhesive systems and composite resin.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Glass Ionomer Composite Resin Adhesive System Shear Bond Strength Thermal Cycle.
Kaynakça
- 1. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:41-54.
- 2. Burgess JO, Deniz C. Material selection for direct posterior restoratives. Dental Economics 2011;15: 34.
- 3. Schmalz G, Schwendicke F, Hickel R, Platt JA. Alternative direct restorative materials for dental amalgam: A concise review based on an FDI policy statement. Int Dent J 2023;8:20-3.
- 4. Mutluay MS, Mutluay AT. Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selçuk Dent J 2016;3:151-58.
- 5. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15-21.
- 6. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ıonomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;28:7-16.
- 7. Menne-Happ U, IIie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013;41:223-30
- 8. Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater 2011;27:1031-37.
- 9. Nagaraja Upadhya P, Kishore G. Glass ionomer cement – the different generations. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005;18:158-65.
- 10. Fırat E. Kütük ZB. Gürgan S. Çakır FY. Öztaş SS. Güncel bir cam iyonomer restoratif sistemin 24-aylık klinik performansının değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2011;38:53-61.
- 11. Celik EU, Ermis B. Koruyucu rezin uygulamasının yüksek viskoziteli geleneksel cam iyonomer simanın mikrosertliği üzerine etkisinin ın vıtro olarak değerlendirilmesi. Cumhur. Dent J 2008;11:91-5.
- 12. Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2006;31:584-89.
- 13. Eligüzeloğlu E. Son dönem geliştirilen adeziv sistemler. OMÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;10:22-9.
- 14. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:175-90.
- 15. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS, editors. Quintessence. 2nd edition. Carol Stream: Academic Press; 2001. P. 178-235
- 16. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’ vs ‘multi-bottle’ dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2002;17:373-80.
- 17. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:41-54.
- 18. Kanık Ö, Türkün LŞ. Restoratif cam iyonomer simanlarda güncel yaklaşımlar. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016;37:54-65.
- 19. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76.
- 20. Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etchand-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2016;16:96-106.
- 21. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2013;38:267-74.
- 22. Barutçugil Ç, Barutçugil K, Kürklü D, Arslan H. Farklı yüzey işlemleri uygulanmiş dentine universal bağlayıcı ajanın bağlanma dayanımının incelenmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2013;21:324-30.
- 23. El Araby AM, Talic YF. The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Prac 2007;8:17-24.
- 24. Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:845-52.
- 25. Molina GF, Cabral RJ, Mazzola I, Lascano LB, Frencken JE. Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with atraumatic restorative treatment. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:243-49.
- 26. Dowling AD, Fleming GJP. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent 2009;37:133-40.
- 27. Fleming GJP, Kenny SM, Barralet JE. The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes. J Dent 2006;34:155-63
- 28. Andrews EK, Gedge JL, Vandewalle KS. Bond Strength of a Novel Universal Resin Cement to Dentin with or without an Adhesive Bonding Agent: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023 1;24(10):725-8.
- 29. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2007;26:694-9.
- 30. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:200-6.
Yüksek Viskoziteli Cam İyonomer Siman Tamirinde Farklı Bonding Sistemlerinin ve Restoratif Materyallerin Makaslama Bağlantı Dayanımı Üzerine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi
Öz
Amaç: Günümüzde cam iyonomer simanların mekanik özelliklerini arttırmak amacıyla doldurucu partikül boyutları küçültülerek yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer simanlar üretilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer simanların kırık tamirinde kullanılabilecek uygun adeziv sistem ve restoratif materyali belirlemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada standart boyutta toplam 140 akrilik blok kullanıldı. Rastgele seçilen akrilik bloklardan her grupta 10’ar örnek olacak şekilde 14 grup oluşturuldu. İlk 13 gruba yüksek viskoziteli cam iyomomer siman, son gruba ise rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer siman yerleştirildi. Tüm örneklere termal siklus ile yaşlandırma işlemi uygulandıktan sonra 4 farklı adeziv sistem, 2 farklı kompozit rezin ve 2 farklı restoratif tipte cam iyonomer siman ile tamir restorayonları yapıldı. Tamir restorasyonlarının ardından tekrar termal siklus ile yaşlandırma işlemi uygulandı ve bağlantı yüzeylerindeki makaslama bağlantı dayanım kuvvetleri değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analizler için Tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Duncan çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanıldı.
Bulgular: En yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri total etch adeziv sistem ile elde edildi (p<0,001). En düşük makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri adeziv sistem kullanılmayan yüksek viskoziteli cam iyomomer simanın yüksek viskoziteli cam iyomomer siman ile restore edildiğinde elde edildi (p<0,001).
Sonuç: Yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomerler simanların tamirinde, total etch sistemler ile kompozit rezin restorasyonların kullanımı daha yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
cam iyonomer siman adeziv sistem kompozit rezin makaslama bağlantı dayanımı termal siklus
Kaynakça
- 1. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:41-54.
- 2. Burgess JO, Deniz C. Material selection for direct posterior restoratives. Dental Economics 2011;15: 34.
- 3. Schmalz G, Schwendicke F, Hickel R, Platt JA. Alternative direct restorative materials for dental amalgam: A concise review based on an FDI policy statement. Int Dent J 2023;8:20-3.
- 4. Mutluay MS, Mutluay AT. Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selçuk Dent J 2016;3:151-58.
- 5. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15-21.
- 6. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ıonomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;28:7-16.
- 7. Menne-Happ U, IIie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013;41:223-30
- 8. Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater 2011;27:1031-37.
- 9. Nagaraja Upadhya P, Kishore G. Glass ionomer cement – the different generations. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005;18:158-65.
- 10. Fırat E. Kütük ZB. Gürgan S. Çakır FY. Öztaş SS. Güncel bir cam iyonomer restoratif sistemin 24-aylık klinik performansının değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2011;38:53-61.
- 11. Celik EU, Ermis B. Koruyucu rezin uygulamasının yüksek viskoziteli geleneksel cam iyonomer simanın mikrosertliği üzerine etkisinin ın vıtro olarak değerlendirilmesi. Cumhur. Dent J 2008;11:91-5.
- 12. Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2006;31:584-89.
- 13. Eligüzeloğlu E. Son dönem geliştirilen adeziv sistemler. OMÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;10:22-9.
- 14. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:175-90.
- 15. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS, editors. Quintessence. 2nd edition. Carol Stream: Academic Press; 2001. P. 178-235
- 16. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’ vs ‘multi-bottle’ dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2002;17:373-80.
- 17. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:41-54.
- 18. Kanık Ö, Türkün LŞ. Restoratif cam iyonomer simanlarda güncel yaklaşımlar. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016;37:54-65.
- 19. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76.
- 20. Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etchand-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2016;16:96-106.
- 21. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2013;38:267-74.
- 22. Barutçugil Ç, Barutçugil K, Kürklü D, Arslan H. Farklı yüzey işlemleri uygulanmiş dentine universal bağlayıcı ajanın bağlanma dayanımının incelenmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2013;21:324-30.
- 23. El Araby AM, Talic YF. The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Prac 2007;8:17-24.
- 24. Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:845-52.
- 25. Molina GF, Cabral RJ, Mazzola I, Lascano LB, Frencken JE. Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with atraumatic restorative treatment. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:243-49.
- 26. Dowling AD, Fleming GJP. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent 2009;37:133-40.
- 27. Fleming GJP, Kenny SM, Barralet JE. The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes. J Dent 2006;34:155-63
- 28. Andrews EK, Gedge JL, Vandewalle KS. Bond Strength of a Novel Universal Resin Cement to Dentin with or without an Adhesive Bonding Agent: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023 1;24(10):725-8.
- 29. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2007;26:694-9.
- 30. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:200-6.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Çocuk Diş Hekimliği, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi |
| Bölüm | ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Nisan 2024 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 22 Ağustos 2023 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 23 Ocak 2024 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 |
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.