Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türk Subpopülasyonunda Üçüncü Molar Agenezi Prevalansı: Klinik Değerlendirme

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 104 - 108, 30.06.2024

Berrin Çelik

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1411544

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk subpopülasyonunda geniş bir yaş aralığında üçüncü molar (3M) agenezi prevalansını ve dağılımını, klinik değerlendirme ile araştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yaşları 15 ile 83 arasında değişen, toplam 1479 hastanın (905 kadın, 574 erkek) klinik muayene ve radyografik değerlendirmeleri yapıldı. Hastaların cinsiyet ve yaş bilgileri, 3M agenezi varlığı/yokluğu, agenezi sayısı, çene lokalizasyonları (maksilla/mandibula) ve ilgili diş numarası not edildi. Veriler ki-kare testi kullanılarak analiz edildi (p<0.05).
Bulgular: Bir veya daha fazla 3M agenezi prevelansı %25.3 (374 kişi) olarak bulundu. 3M agenezi sıklığı kadınlarda erkeklere göre yüksekti, ancak cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p=0.380). En az 3M eksikliği gözlenen grup, %22.1 prevalans oranıyla 15-22 yaş aralığındaydı. En sık üst sağ 3M dişinde agenezi izlendi (%16.7). Hastaların % 4.9'unda 3M’ların tamamı eksikti.
Sonuçlar: Popülasyon içindeki yaş grupları arasındaki farklı prevalans oranları, özellikle yeni nesilde görülen düşük oranlar, daha geniş kapsamlı yeni araştırmaların yapılması gerekliliğini doğurabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agenezi Prevalans Üçüncü Molar

Kaynakça

  • 1. Sujon MK, Alam MK, Rahman SA. Prevalence of third molar agenesis: Associated dental anomalies in non-syndromic 5923 patients. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162070.
  • 2. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94:886–894.
  • 3. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar agenesis and reduction in the number of other teeth. J Dent Res 1962;41:717.
  • 4. Kajii TS, Sato Y, Kajii S, Sugawara Y, Iida J. Agenesis of third molar germs depends on sagittal maxillary jaw dimensions in orthodontic patients in Japan. Angle Orthod 2004;74:337–342.
  • 5. Shapira J, Chaushu S, Becker A. Prevalence of tooth transposition, third molar agenesis, and maxillary canine impaction in individuals with Down syndrome. Angle Orthod 2000;70:290–296.
  • 6. Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Kazanci F. Frequency of agenesis, impaction, angulation, and related pathologic changes of third molar teeth in orthodontic patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:990–995.
  • 7. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and Demographic Predictors of Third Molar Agenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:886-894.
  • 8. Topkara A, Sari Z. Prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in a Turkish orthodontic patient population: results from a large academic cohort. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011;12:123-127.
  • 9. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Oktay H. Third-molar agenesis among patients from the East Anatolian Region of Turkey. J Compent Dent Pract 2010;11:33-40.
  • 10. Kilinç G, Akkemik OK, Candan U, Evcil MS, Ellidokuz H. Agenesis of third molars among Turkish children between the ages of 12 and 18 years: A retrospective radiographic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;41:243-247
  • 11. Rozkovcová E, Marková M, Lanik J, Zvárová J. Agenesis of third molars in young Czech population. Prague Med Rep 2004;105:35-52.
  • 12. Pamukcu U, Ispir NG, Toraman Alkurt M, Altunkaynak B, Peker I. Evaluation of the frequency of third molar agenesis according to different age groups. Am J Hum Biol 2020;33:e23487
  • 13. Carter K. The evolution of third molar agenesis and impaction. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 2016.
  • 14. Garn SM, Lewis A, Walenga A. Two-generation confirmation of crown-size body-size relationships in human beings. J Dent Res 1968;47:1197.
  • 15. John J, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Mohamed NH, Ahmad NF, Murad NA. Third molar agenesis among children and youths from three major races of Malaysians. J Dent Sci 2012;7:211-217.
  • 16. Endo S, Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Abe R, Endo T. Association between third molar agenesis patterns and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology 2015;103:89–96.
  • 17. Ochoa BK, Nanda RS. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:148–159.
  • 18. Bolaños MV, Moussa H, Manrique MC, Bolaños MJ. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in Spanish children and young people. Forensic Sci Int 2003;133:212–229.
  • 19. Barka G, Tretiakov G, Theodosiou T, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I. Presence of third molars in orthodontic patients from northern Greece. Int J Gen Med 2012;5:441–447.
  • 20. Kaur B, Sheikh S. Status of third molars in North Indian population-A radiographic survey. J Dental Peers 2013;1:10-18.
  • 21. Liu XQ, Sun XY, Chen J, Liu J, Xu H, Fan CH. A statistic analysis on absence of third molar germs in orthodontic patients. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2004;22:493–495.
  • 22. Daito M, Tanaka T, Hieda T. Clinical observations on the development of third molars. J Osaka Dent Univ 1992;26:91–104.
  • 23. Tekbas-Atay M, Ozveren N, Serindere G. Evaluation of Third Molar Agenesis Associated with Hypodontia and Oligodontia in Turkish Pediatric Patients. Eur Oral Res 2020;54: 136-141.
  • 24. Alam MK, Hamza MA, Khafiz MA, Rahman SA, Shaari R, Hassan A. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting presence and/or agenesis of third molar tooth. PLoS One 2014;9:e101157.
  • 25. Kaur B, Sheik S, Pallagatti S. Radiographic assessment of agenesis of third molars and para-radicular third molar radiolucencies in population of age group 18-25 years old–a radiographic survey. Arch Oral Res 2012;8:13-18.
  • 26. Singh N, Chaudhari S, Chaudhari R, Nagare S, Kulkarni A, Parkarwar P. A radiographic survey of agenesis of the third molar: a panoramic study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:130–134.
  • 27. Moreno MT, Díaz A, González A, Manríquez-Soto G, Toro-Ibacache V. Is third molar agenesis an anomaly or just a sign of variation? Prevalence and manner of presentation of this condition in a sample from the metropolitan region of Chile. Int J Morphol 2019;37:1382–1386.

Prevalence of Third Molar Agenesis in the Turkish Subpopulation: Clinical Evaluation

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 104 - 108, 30.06.2024

Berrin Çelik

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1411544

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk subpopülasyonunda geniş bir yaş aralığında üçüncü molar (3M) agenezi prevalansını ve dağılımını, klinik değerlendirme ile araştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yaşları 15 ile 83 arasında değişen, toplam 1479 hastanın (905 kadın, 574 erkek) klinik muayene ve radyografik değerlendirmeleri yapıldı. Hastaların cinsiyet ve yaş bilgileri, 3M agenezi varlığı/yokluğu, agenezi sayısı, çene lokalizasyonları (maksilla/mandibula) ve ilgili diş numarası not edildi. Veriler ki-kare testi kullanılarak analiz edildi (p<0.05).
Bulgular: Bir veya daha fazla 3M agenezi prevelansı %25.3 (374 kişi) olarak bulundu. 3M agenezi sıklığı kadınlarda erkeklere göre yüksekti, ancak cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p=0.380). En az 3M eksikliği gözlenen grup, %22.1 prevalans oranıyla 15-22 yaş aralığındaydı. En sık üst sağ 3M dişinde agenezi izlendi (%16.7). Hastaların % 4.9'unda 3M’ların tamamı eksikti.
Sonuçlar: Popülasyon içindeki yaş grupları arasındaki farklı prevalans oranları, özellikle yeni nesilde görülen düşük oranlar, daha geniş kapsamlı yeni araştırmaların yapılması gerekliliğini doğurabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agenesis Prevalence Third Molar

Kaynakça

  • 1. Sujon MK, Alam MK, Rahman SA. Prevalence of third molar agenesis: Associated dental anomalies in non-syndromic 5923 patients. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162070.
  • 2. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94:886–894.
  • 3. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar agenesis and reduction in the number of other teeth. J Dent Res 1962;41:717.
  • 4. Kajii TS, Sato Y, Kajii S, Sugawara Y, Iida J. Agenesis of third molar germs depends on sagittal maxillary jaw dimensions in orthodontic patients in Japan. Angle Orthod 2004;74:337–342.
  • 5. Shapira J, Chaushu S, Becker A. Prevalence of tooth transposition, third molar agenesis, and maxillary canine impaction in individuals with Down syndrome. Angle Orthod 2000;70:290–296.
  • 6. Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Kazanci F. Frequency of agenesis, impaction, angulation, and related pathologic changes of third molar teeth in orthodontic patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:990–995.
  • 7. Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and Demographic Predictors of Third Molar Agenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:886-894.
  • 8. Topkara A, Sari Z. Prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in a Turkish orthodontic patient population: results from a large academic cohort. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011;12:123-127.
  • 9. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Oktay H. Third-molar agenesis among patients from the East Anatolian Region of Turkey. J Compent Dent Pract 2010;11:33-40.
  • 10. Kilinç G, Akkemik OK, Candan U, Evcil MS, Ellidokuz H. Agenesis of third molars among Turkish children between the ages of 12 and 18 years: A retrospective radiographic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;41:243-247
  • 11. Rozkovcová E, Marková M, Lanik J, Zvárová J. Agenesis of third molars in young Czech population. Prague Med Rep 2004;105:35-52.
  • 12. Pamukcu U, Ispir NG, Toraman Alkurt M, Altunkaynak B, Peker I. Evaluation of the frequency of third molar agenesis according to different age groups. Am J Hum Biol 2020;33:e23487
  • 13. Carter K. The evolution of third molar agenesis and impaction. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 2016.
  • 14. Garn SM, Lewis A, Walenga A. Two-generation confirmation of crown-size body-size relationships in human beings. J Dent Res 1968;47:1197.
  • 15. John J, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Mohamed NH, Ahmad NF, Murad NA. Third molar agenesis among children and youths from three major races of Malaysians. J Dent Sci 2012;7:211-217.
  • 16. Endo S, Sanpei S, Ishida R, Sanpei S, Abe R, Endo T. Association between third molar agenesis patterns and agenesis of other teeth in a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology 2015;103:89–96.
  • 17. Ochoa BK, Nanda RS. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:148–159.
  • 18. Bolaños MV, Moussa H, Manrique MC, Bolaños MJ. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in Spanish children and young people. Forensic Sci Int 2003;133:212–229.
  • 19. Barka G, Tretiakov G, Theodosiou T, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I. Presence of third molars in orthodontic patients from northern Greece. Int J Gen Med 2012;5:441–447.
  • 20. Kaur B, Sheikh S. Status of third molars in North Indian population-A radiographic survey. J Dental Peers 2013;1:10-18.
  • 21. Liu XQ, Sun XY, Chen J, Liu J, Xu H, Fan CH. A statistic analysis on absence of third molar germs in orthodontic patients. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2004;22:493–495.
  • 22. Daito M, Tanaka T, Hieda T. Clinical observations on the development of third molars. J Osaka Dent Univ 1992;26:91–104.
  • 23. Tekbas-Atay M, Ozveren N, Serindere G. Evaluation of Third Molar Agenesis Associated with Hypodontia and Oligodontia in Turkish Pediatric Patients. Eur Oral Res 2020;54: 136-141.
  • 24. Alam MK, Hamza MA, Khafiz MA, Rahman SA, Shaari R, Hassan A. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting presence and/or agenesis of third molar tooth. PLoS One 2014;9:e101157.
  • 25. Kaur B, Sheik S, Pallagatti S. Radiographic assessment of agenesis of third molars and para-radicular third molar radiolucencies in population of age group 18-25 years old–a radiographic survey. Arch Oral Res 2012;8:13-18.
  • 26. Singh N, Chaudhari S, Chaudhari R, Nagare S, Kulkarni A, Parkarwar P. A radiographic survey of agenesis of the third molar: a panoramic study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:130–134.
  • 27. Moreno MT, Díaz A, González A, Manríquez-Soto G, Toro-Ibacache V. Is third molar agenesis an anomaly or just a sign of variation? Prevalence and manner of presentation of this condition in a sample from the metropolitan region of Chile. Int J Morphol 2019;37:1382–1386.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Berrin Çelik 0000-0002-3602-2354

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Aralık 2023
Kabul Tarihi 21 Nisan 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Çelik B (01 Haziran 2024) Prevalence of Third Molar Agenesis in the Turkish Subpopulation: Clinical Evaluation. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 27 2 104–108.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.