Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 417 - 425, 31.12.2023

Gizem Gökçen Yıldırımoğlu , İhsan Hubbezoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Cited By: 1

Öz

Proje Numarası

DİŞ-2021-274

Kaynakça

  • Qualtrough A, Burke F. A look at dental esthetics, Quintessence Int, 25(1), 1994.
  • Papadogiannis Y, Lakes R, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Papadogiannis D. Fatigue of packable dental composites, Dental Materials, 2007, 23(2):235-242.
  • Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam N. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials, Brazilian Oral Research, 2012, 28(1):87-101.
  • Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2003, 134(10):1382-1390.
  • Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. Journal of dental research, 2010,89(6):549-560.
  • Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Operative dentistry,1996, 21(2):73-80.
  • Jung M, Bruegger H, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(6):816-824.
  • Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of materials science Materials in medicine, 2007, 18(1):155-163.
  • Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 1999, 15(2):79-86.
  • Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2000, 15(3):331-344.
  • Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
  • Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2000, 27(3):205-210.
  • Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri R. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins, Journal of International Oral Health, 2015, 7(7):63.
  • Lainović T, Blažić L, Kukuruzović D, Vilotić M, Ivanišević A, Kakaš D. Effect of diamond paste finishing on surface topography and roughness of dental nanohybrid composites–AFM analysis, Procedia Engineering, 2014, 69:945-951.
  • Rocha RS, Oliveira AC, Caneppele TMF, Bresciani E. Effect of artificial aging protocols on surface gloss of resin composites, International Journal of Dent, 2017.
  • Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals, Dental Materials, 2013, 29(9):e213-e217.
  • Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso P. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations, Dental Materials, 2004, 20(8):726-32.
  • Leal A, Paula A, Ramalho A, Esteves M, Ferreira MM, Carrilho E, et al. Roughness and microhardness of composites after different bleaching techniques, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, 2015, 13(4):381-388.
  • Quirynen M, Bollen C. The influence of surface roughness and surface‐free energy on supra‐and subgingival plaque formation in man: A review of the literature, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1995, 22(1):1-14.
  • Hondrum SO, Fernandez Jr R. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials, Operative Dentistry, 1997, 22(1):30-36.
  • Roeder L, Tate W, Powers J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites, Operative Dentistry, 2000, 25(6):534-43.
  • Turkun L, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials, Operative Dentistry, 2004, 29(2):203-11.
  • Yamanel K. Farklı Profilaktik Parlatma İşlemlerinin Mikrohibrit ve Nanohibrit Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 2018, 21(2):85-92.
  • Daud A, Adams AJ, Shawkat A, Gray G, Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, et al. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures, Journal of Dentistry, 2020, 99:103376.
  • Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite, Operative Dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
  • Onur U, Gökay O, Müjdeci A. Siloran bazlı bir kompozit rezinin yüzey sertliği üzerine bitirme ve cila işlemlerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi, A.ü Diş. Hek. Fak. Dergi, 2008, 35:5-9.
  • Gökay O, Özyurt P, Seçkin B. Farklı bitirme ve cila yöntemleri uygulanmış bir kompozit rezinin çeşitli likitler karşısında gösterdiği yüzey sertlik değerlerinin karşılaştırılması, Klin Diş Hek Bil, 1998, 4:55-60.
  • Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. European journal of dentistry, 2012, 6(2):198-205.
  • Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Operative dentistry, 2006, 31(1):11-17.
  • Özgünaltay G, Yazici A, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth‐coloured restoratives, Jounal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003, 30(2):218-224.
  • Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MFdL, Nunes O. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins, Brazilian Dental Journal, 2005,16:39-44.
  • Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Öcal İ. Farkli cila sistemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri üzerine etkisi, Yeditepe J. Dent, 2020,16(2):147-153.
  • Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Operative dentistry, 2008, 33(1):44-50.
  • Dursun MN, Atalay C. Farkli Polisaj Sistemlerinin Posterior Bölgede Kullanilan Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni, 2021, 31(3):373-8.
  • Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. International journal of applied & basic medical research, 2019, 9(3):154-8.
  • Ersöz E, & Erkli, H. Farklı Cila Materyallerinin Bir Kompozit Rezin Materyalin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2012, 18(2).
  • Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: a review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry, 2004, 16(1):19-31.
  • Göztaş Z, Tosun G, Yıldız E, Kahraman K. Nanodoldurucu içeren beş farklı kompozitin yüzey sertliği ve pürüzlülüğü açısından değerlendirilmesi, Selcuk Dental Journal, 2014, 1(2):43-48.

Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 417 - 425, 31.12.2023

Gizem Gökçen Yıldırımoğlu , İhsan Hubbezoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Cited By: 1

Öz

ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of three different types of highly esthetic composite resin, which will be used for aesthetic purposes in the anterior region, on the surface roughness and microhardness by the application of three different finishing and polishing systems, with three-dimensional Optical Profilometer, Vickers microhardness device and SEM analysis.
Materials and methods: Three different composite resins were used in the study; supra-nanofil(Tokuyama Estelite Asteria), supra-nano spherical(Tokuyama Omnichroma), nanohybrid(Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) were used. 40 samples of each composite resin were prepared, 120 in total. After the polymerization and correction processes, ten samples from each group that did not undergo any polishing process were separated as the control group. Then, they were randomly divided into three groups for the polishing process: 4-stage aluminum oxide coated disc(3M Sof-lex disc), beige and pink 2-step spiral rubber consisting of aluminum oxide-containing diamond particles(3M Sof-lex spiral), polyurethane, diamond granules. containing light blue rubber and spiral rubber(Ivoclar Vivadent OptraGloss). Surface roughness(Ra) was measured on all samples with a conventional profilometer device. Then, one sample surface from each group was examined with the Optical Profilometer device and the Scanning Electron Microscope, and all samples were subjected to microhardness testing with the Vickers Microhardness Tester.
Results: As a result of our study, the lowest roughness values were observed in the control group, while the highest roughness values were observed in the Ivoclar Optragloss group. The groups studied with Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic composite showed higher roughness values compared to other composite groups, but no statistically significant difference was found with other composite groups(p>0.05). In our study, the lowest microhardness values were observed in the control group, while the highest microhardness values were observed in the Sof-Lex Disk group. The difference between the groups treated with Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic composite and the other composite groups was found to be statistically significant(p<0.05). The lowest microhardness values were observed in the groups treated with Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic composite.
Conclusions: It was observed that the effectiveness of the polishing systems used on different restorative materials was different, and when the polishing systems were compared, the Soflex multi-stage disc system and the Soflex two-stage spiral tire system were found to be more successful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

aesthetic composite surface roughness microhardness

Proje Numarası

DİŞ-2021-274

Kaynakça

  • Qualtrough A, Burke F. A look at dental esthetics, Quintessence Int, 25(1), 1994.
  • Papadogiannis Y, Lakes R, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Papadogiannis D. Fatigue of packable dental composites, Dental Materials, 2007, 23(2):235-242.
  • Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam N. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials, Brazilian Oral Research, 2012, 28(1):87-101.
  • Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2003, 134(10):1382-1390.
  • Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. Journal of dental research, 2010,89(6):549-560.
  • Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Operative dentistry,1996, 21(2):73-80.
  • Jung M, Bruegger H, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(6):816-824.
  • Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of materials science Materials in medicine, 2007, 18(1):155-163.
  • Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 1999, 15(2):79-86.
  • Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2000, 15(3):331-344.
  • Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
  • Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2000, 27(3):205-210.
  • Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri R. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins, Journal of International Oral Health, 2015, 7(7):63.
  • Lainović T, Blažić L, Kukuruzović D, Vilotić M, Ivanišević A, Kakaš D. Effect of diamond paste finishing on surface topography and roughness of dental nanohybrid composites–AFM analysis, Procedia Engineering, 2014, 69:945-951.
  • Rocha RS, Oliveira AC, Caneppele TMF, Bresciani E. Effect of artificial aging protocols on surface gloss of resin composites, International Journal of Dent, 2017.
  • Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals, Dental Materials, 2013, 29(9):e213-e217.
  • Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso P. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations, Dental Materials, 2004, 20(8):726-32.
  • Leal A, Paula A, Ramalho A, Esteves M, Ferreira MM, Carrilho E, et al. Roughness and microhardness of composites after different bleaching techniques, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, 2015, 13(4):381-388.
  • Quirynen M, Bollen C. The influence of surface roughness and surface‐free energy on supra‐and subgingival plaque formation in man: A review of the literature, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1995, 22(1):1-14.
  • Hondrum SO, Fernandez Jr R. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials, Operative Dentistry, 1997, 22(1):30-36.
  • Roeder L, Tate W, Powers J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites, Operative Dentistry, 2000, 25(6):534-43.
  • Turkun L, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials, Operative Dentistry, 2004, 29(2):203-11.
  • Yamanel K. Farklı Profilaktik Parlatma İşlemlerinin Mikrohibrit ve Nanohibrit Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 2018, 21(2):85-92.
  • Daud A, Adams AJ, Shawkat A, Gray G, Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, et al. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures, Journal of Dentistry, 2020, 99:103376.
  • Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite, Operative Dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
  • Onur U, Gökay O, Müjdeci A. Siloran bazlı bir kompozit rezinin yüzey sertliği üzerine bitirme ve cila işlemlerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi, A.ü Diş. Hek. Fak. Dergi, 2008, 35:5-9.
  • Gökay O, Özyurt P, Seçkin B. Farklı bitirme ve cila yöntemleri uygulanmış bir kompozit rezinin çeşitli likitler karşısında gösterdiği yüzey sertlik değerlerinin karşılaştırılması, Klin Diş Hek Bil, 1998, 4:55-60.
  • Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. European journal of dentistry, 2012, 6(2):198-205.
  • Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Operative dentistry, 2006, 31(1):11-17.
  • Özgünaltay G, Yazici A, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth‐coloured restoratives, Jounal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003, 30(2):218-224.
  • Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MFdL, Nunes O. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins, Brazilian Dental Journal, 2005,16:39-44.
  • Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Öcal İ. Farkli cila sistemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri üzerine etkisi, Yeditepe J. Dent, 2020,16(2):147-153.
  • Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Operative dentistry, 2008, 33(1):44-50.
  • Dursun MN, Atalay C. Farkli Polisaj Sistemlerinin Posterior Bölgede Kullanilan Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni, 2021, 31(3):373-8.
  • Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. International journal of applied & basic medical research, 2019, 9(3):154-8.
  • Ersöz E, & Erkli, H. Farklı Cila Materyallerinin Bir Kompozit Rezin Materyalin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2012, 18(2).
  • Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: a review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry, 2004, 16(1):19-31.
  • Göztaş Z, Tosun G, Yıldız E, Kahraman K. Nanodoldurucu içeren beş farklı kompozitin yüzey sertliği ve pürüzlülüğü açısından değerlendirilmesi, Selcuk Dental Journal, 2014, 1(2):43-48.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Restoratif Diş Tedavisi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Gizem Gökçen Yıldırımoğlu 0000-0001-5913-0203

İhsan Hubbezoğlu 0000-0001-8984-9286

Proje Numarası DİŞ-2021-274
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 24 Aralık 2023
Kabul Tarihi 26 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Gökçen Yıldırımoğlu G, Hubbezoğlu İ (01 Aralık 2023) Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 4 417–425.

Cited By

Clinical study of cervical caries treatment the effectiveness by assessing composite restorations condition
Inter Collegas
https://doi.org/10.35339/ic.11.2.zab
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.