Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 17 - 21, 26.03.2023

Nidhi James Tina Purayil Vathsala Patil Kalyan Pentapati Ravindranath Vineetha

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1134687

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Reference1. Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:456–64.
  • Reference2. Sardar KP, Khokhar NH, Siddiqui I. Frequency of two canals in maxillary second premolar tooth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan 2007;17:12–4.
  • Reference3. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004;30:391–8.
  • Reference4. England MC, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod 1991;17:174–8.
  • Reference5. Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359–70.
  • Reference6. Martins JNR, Gu Y, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences on the Root and Root Canal Morphologies between Asian and White Ethnic Groups Analyzed by Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod 2018;44:1096–104.
  • Reference7. Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:555–73.
  • Reference8. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top 2005;10:3–29.
  • Reference9. Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging 2012;12:18.
  • Reference10. Baisden MK, Kulild JC, Weller RN. Root canal configuration of the mandibular first premolar. J Endod 1992;18:505–8.
  • Reference11. Cooke HG, Cox FL. C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:836–9.
  • Reference12. Arayasantiparb R, Banomyong D. Prevalence and morphology of multiple roots, root canals and C-shaped canals in mandibular premolars from cone-beam computed tomography images in a Thai population. J Dent Sci 2021;16:201–7.
  • Reference13. Brea G, Gomez F, Gomez-Sosa JF. Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:1–8.
  • Reference14. Dou L, Li D, Xu T, Tang Y, Yang D. Root anatomy and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–7. Reference15. Fan B, Ye W, Xie E, Wu H, Gutmann JL. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Int Endod J 2012;45:1035–41.
  • Reference16. Adarsh K, Sharma P, Juneja A. Accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements on conventional and CBCT images: An in vitro comparative study. J Orthod Sci 2018;7.
  • Reference17. Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty H, Bhat GT, Shetty S. A Three-Dimensional Study of Variations in Root Canal Morphology Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of Mandibular Premolars in a South Indian Population. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC22.
  • Reference18. Jain A, Bahuguna R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a gujarati population - an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8:118–22.
  • Reference19. Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2009;42:54–8.
  • Reference20. Abraham SB, Gopinath VK. Root canal anatomy of mandibular first premolars in an Emirati subpopulation: A laboratory study. Eur J Dent 2015;9:476.
  • Reference21. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:589–99.
  • Reference22. Zhang W, Tang Y, Liu C, Shen Y, Feng X, Gu Y. Root and root canal variations of the human maxillary and mandibular third molars in a Chinese population: A micro-computed tomographic study. Arch Oral Biol 2018;95:134–40.
  • Reference23. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 1986;12:343–5.
  • Reference24. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007;33:509–16.
  • Reference25. Singh S, Pawar M. Root canal morphology of South asian Indian mandibular premolar teeth. J Endod 2014;40:1338–41.
  • Reference26. Yang H, Tian C, Li G, Yang L, Han X, Wang Y. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod 2013;39:435–8.
  • Reference27. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:101–10.
  • Reference28. Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:738–44.
  • Reference29. Çalişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioǧlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SŞ. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21:200–4.
  • Reference30. Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular First Premolar in a Chinese Population Using the Cross Section Method. J Endod 2006;32:932–6.
  • Reference31. Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2008;41:240–8.
  • Reference32. Parekh V, Shah N, Joshi H. Root canal morphology and variations of mandibular premolars by clearing technique: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:318–21.
  • Reference33. Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Al-Dahman YH, et al. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Saudi Dent J 2019;31:137–42.
  • Reference34. Shrestha R, Srii R, Shrestha D. Diversity of root canal morphology in mandibular first premolar. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2019;17:223–8.
  • Reference35.Habib AA, Kalaji MN, Al Saysd TJ, Al Jawfi KA. Root canal configurations of the first and second mandibular premolars in the population of north Syria. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2015;10:391–5.
  • Reference36. Xu J, Shao MY, Pan HY, et al. A proposal for using contralateral teeth to provide well-balanced experimental groups for endodontic studies. Int Endod J 2016;49:1001–8.
  • Reference37. Johnsen GF, Dara S, Asjad S, Sunde PT, Haugen HJ. Anatomic Comparison of Contralateral Premolars. J Endod 2017;43:956–63.

Morphologic Variations and Gender Dimorphism in Mandibular First Premolar Root Canal Pattern: A CBCT Study in South Indian Population

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 17 - 21, 26.03.2023

Nidhi James Tina Purayil Vathsala Patil Kalyan Pentapati Ravindranath Vineetha

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1134687

Öz

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the variations in the RCM of mandibular first premolars (MFP) in south Indians and also evaluated the gender dimorphism and contralateral symmetry of the pattern.
Methods: 200 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of MFP of patients above 18 years were analyzed for the root canal morphology after excluding the distorted images, endodontically treated tooth or fractured root. The teeth were carefully evaluated in cross-sectional, axial and coronal sections and the information regarding the number of roots and the type of root canal as per Vertucci’s classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were also checked.
Results: Single rooted teeth with Type I (73.01%) variation was the most prevalent pattern observed in the study population, which was followed by Type III (14.11%) and Type V (5.52%), respectively. Type IV and Type VIII variations were not found in our study.
Conclusions: In both males and females, type I configuration was the most common pattern with symmetry in contralateral mandibular single-rooted first premolars.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cone Beam Computed Tomography Mandible morphology premolar root canal

Kaynakça

  • Reference1. Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:456–64.
  • Reference2. Sardar KP, Khokhar NH, Siddiqui I. Frequency of two canals in maxillary second premolar tooth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan 2007;17:12–4.
  • Reference3. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004;30:391–8.
  • Reference4. England MC, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod 1991;17:174–8.
  • Reference5. Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359–70.
  • Reference6. Martins JNR, Gu Y, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences on the Root and Root Canal Morphologies between Asian and White Ethnic Groups Analyzed by Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod 2018;44:1096–104.
  • Reference7. Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:555–73.
  • Reference8. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top 2005;10:3–29.
  • Reference9. Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging 2012;12:18.
  • Reference10. Baisden MK, Kulild JC, Weller RN. Root canal configuration of the mandibular first premolar. J Endod 1992;18:505–8.
  • Reference11. Cooke HG, Cox FL. C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:836–9.
  • Reference12. Arayasantiparb R, Banomyong D. Prevalence and morphology of multiple roots, root canals and C-shaped canals in mandibular premolars from cone-beam computed tomography images in a Thai population. J Dent Sci 2021;16:201–7.
  • Reference13. Brea G, Gomez F, Gomez-Sosa JF. Cone‐beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:1–8.
  • Reference14. Dou L, Li D, Xu T, Tang Y, Yang D. Root anatomy and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–7. Reference15. Fan B, Ye W, Xie E, Wu H, Gutmann JL. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Int Endod J 2012;45:1035–41.
  • Reference16. Adarsh K, Sharma P, Juneja A. Accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements on conventional and CBCT images: An in vitro comparative study. J Orthod Sci 2018;7.
  • Reference17. Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty H, Bhat GT, Shetty S. A Three-Dimensional Study of Variations in Root Canal Morphology Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of Mandibular Premolars in a South Indian Population. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC22.
  • Reference18. Jain A, Bahuguna R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a gujarati population - an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8:118–22.
  • Reference19. Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2009;42:54–8.
  • Reference20. Abraham SB, Gopinath VK. Root canal anatomy of mandibular first premolars in an Emirati subpopulation: A laboratory study. Eur J Dent 2015;9:476.
  • Reference21. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:589–99.
  • Reference22. Zhang W, Tang Y, Liu C, Shen Y, Feng X, Gu Y. Root and root canal variations of the human maxillary and mandibular third molars in a Chinese population: A micro-computed tomographic study. Arch Oral Biol 2018;95:134–40.
  • Reference23. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 1986;12:343–5.
  • Reference24. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007;33:509–16.
  • Reference25. Singh S, Pawar M. Root canal morphology of South asian Indian mandibular premolar teeth. J Endod 2014;40:1338–41.
  • Reference26. Yang H, Tian C, Li G, Yang L, Han X, Wang Y. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod 2013;39:435–8.
  • Reference27. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:101–10.
  • Reference28. Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:738–44.
  • Reference29. Çalişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioǧlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SŞ. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21:200–4.
  • Reference30. Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular First Premolar in a Chinese Population Using the Cross Section Method. J Endod 2006;32:932–6.
  • Reference31. Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2008;41:240–8.
  • Reference32. Parekh V, Shah N, Joshi H. Root canal morphology and variations of mandibular premolars by clearing technique: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:318–21.
  • Reference33. Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Al-Dahman YH, et al. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Saudi Dent J 2019;31:137–42.
  • Reference34. Shrestha R, Srii R, Shrestha D. Diversity of root canal morphology in mandibular first premolar. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2019;17:223–8.
  • Reference35.Habib AA, Kalaji MN, Al Saysd TJ, Al Jawfi KA. Root canal configurations of the first and second mandibular premolars in the population of north Syria. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2015;10:391–5.
  • Reference36. Xu J, Shao MY, Pan HY, et al. A proposal for using contralateral teeth to provide well-balanced experimental groups for endodontic studies. Int Endod J 2016;49:1001–8.
  • Reference37. Johnsen GF, Dara S, Asjad S, Sunde PT, Haugen HJ. Anatomic Comparison of Contralateral Premolars. J Endod 2017;43:956–63.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Nidhi James 0000-0002-5351-5150

Tina Purayil 0000-0002-8887-2297

Vathsala Patil 0000-0002-8656-8080

Kalyan Pentapati 0000-0002-5462-5677

Ravindranath Vineetha 0000-0002-8932-9982

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Mart 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

EndNote James N, Purayil T, Patil V, Pentapati K, Vineetha R (01 Mart 2023) Morphologic Variations and Gender Dimorphism in Mandibular First Premolar Root Canal Pattern: A CBCT Study in South Indian Population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 1 17–21.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.