Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Micro-computed tomography assesment of structural microporosity and marginal gaps in different flowable composites placed with different instruments

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 323 - 329, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1115117

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the structural microporosity (MP) and marginal gap (MG) of different flowable composite resins placed with different instruments using micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Materials and Methods: Standard Class II MOD cavities were prepared on 108 lower third molar teeth. Three different flowable composite resins; Filtek Bulk-fill, SDR Bulk-fill and I-Flow conventional flowable composite resin were applied to the cavities using a sharp explorer, a microbrush or an injector. After they were covered with a paste-like nanohybrid composite resin, μCT images were examined in terms of MP and MG. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests.
Results: MP was observed less in explorer group than microbrush and injector groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between microbrush and injector groups (p > 0.05). i-FLOW flowable composite resin showed the highest MP rate compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between SDR and Filtek Bulk-fill in MP (p > 0.05). In terms of MG, i-FLOW presented higher MG values than other two materials (p < 0.05), while the instruments showed similar results (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Additional occluso-gingivally vibration of flowable materials with an explorer may be useful in the placement. Bulk-fill composite resins are better than conventional flowable composite resin in terms of MP and MG.

Destekleyen Kurum

Erciyes University Scientific Research and Projects Foundation

Proje Numarası

TSA-2017-7375

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38(6):618-625.
  • 2. Nazari A, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(3):237-43.
  • 3. Hirata R, Pacheco RR, Caceres E, Janal MN, Romero MF, Giannini M, Coelho PG, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of Sonic Resin Composite Delivery on Void Formation Assessed by Micro-computed Tomography. Oper Dent 2018; 43(2):144-150.
  • 4 Nahedh HA, Sibai NS. Evaluation of Interfacial Gap Volume of Two Low-shrinkage Composites Using Micro-Computed Tomography. Oper Dent 2017; 42(6):658-668.
  • 5. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater 2011; 27(4):348-55.
  • 6. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3(1):45-64.
  • 7. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 2004; 32(2):109-15.
  • 8. Balthazard R, Jager S, Ferry O, Dahoun A, Mortier E. Porosity of flowable resin composites is not influenced by applicator tip diameter. Am J Dent 2017; 30(3):125-130.
  • 9. Algamaiah H, Sampaio CS, Rigo LC, Janal MN, Giannini M, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Reis AF, Hirata R. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29(2):118-127.
  • 10. Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, Li Y, Rudney J, Aparicio C, Fok A. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater 2015; 31(4):382-90.
  • 11. Almeida LJDS Junior, Penha KJS, Souza AF, Lula ECO, Magalhães FC, Lima DM, Firoozmand LM. Is there correlation between polymerization shrinkage, gap formation, and void in bulk fill composites? A μCT study. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31:e100.
  • 12. Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, Gonçalves F. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin -a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2019; 35(10):e249-e264.
  • 13. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique on gap formation. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19(1):77-81.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 323 - 329, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1115117

Öz

Proje Numarası

TSA-2017-7375

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38(6):618-625.
  • 2. Nazari A, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(3):237-43.
  • 3. Hirata R, Pacheco RR, Caceres E, Janal MN, Romero MF, Giannini M, Coelho PG, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of Sonic Resin Composite Delivery on Void Formation Assessed by Micro-computed Tomography. Oper Dent 2018; 43(2):144-150.
  • 4 Nahedh HA, Sibai NS. Evaluation of Interfacial Gap Volume of Two Low-shrinkage Composites Using Micro-Computed Tomography. Oper Dent 2017; 42(6):658-668.
  • 5. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater 2011; 27(4):348-55.
  • 6. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3(1):45-64.
  • 7. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 2004; 32(2):109-15.
  • 8. Balthazard R, Jager S, Ferry O, Dahoun A, Mortier E. Porosity of flowable resin composites is not influenced by applicator tip diameter. Am J Dent 2017; 30(3):125-130.
  • 9. Algamaiah H, Sampaio CS, Rigo LC, Janal MN, Giannini M, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Reis AF, Hirata R. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29(2):118-127.
  • 10. Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, Li Y, Rudney J, Aparicio C, Fok A. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater 2015; 31(4):382-90.
  • 11. Almeida LJDS Junior, Penha KJS, Souza AF, Lula ECO, Magalhães FC, Lima DM, Firoozmand LM. Is there correlation between polymerization shrinkage, gap formation, and void in bulk fill composites? A μCT study. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31:e100.
  • 12. Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, Gonçalves F. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin -a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2019; 35(10):e249-e264.
  • 13. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique on gap formation. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19(1):77-81.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Hacer Balkaya 0000-0001-9180-5610

Sezer Demirbuğa 0000-0001-6013-974X

Ebru Nur Uçar 0000-0002-7592-9397

Burhanettin Avcı 0000-0002-0529-0508

Proje Numarası TSA-2017-7375
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Mayıs 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Balkaya H, Demirbuğa S, Uçar EN, Avcı B (01 Aralık 2022) Micro-computed tomography assesment of structural microporosity and marginal gaps in different flowable composites placed with different instruments. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 4 323–329.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.