Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 1 - 8, 25.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.990835

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Alexander G, Hopcraft MS, Tyas MJ, Wong R. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 3: Dentists' attitudes. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(4):502-513. 2. White BA, Maupomé G. Making clinical decisions for dental care: concepts to consider. Spec Care Dentist. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):168-72.
  • 3. Khalaf ME, Alomari QD, Ngo H, Doméjean S. Restorative treatment[19]thresholds: Factors influencing the treatment thresholds and modalitiesof general dentists in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2014; 23(4): 357-62.
  • 4. Baraba A, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Espelid I, Tveit AB, Miletic I.[20]Survey of Croatian dentists’ restorative treatment decisions onapproximal caries lesions. Croat Med J 2010; 51(6): 509-14.
  • 5. Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, et al. National Dental PBRN[21]Collaborative Group. Agreement among dentists’ restorative treatmentplanning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximalcaries, and existing restorations: Findings from The National DentalPractice-Based Research Network. J Dent 2013; 41(8): 718-25.
  • 6. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warz) 2009;57:13.
  • 7. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Neuhaus C, Daniel H-D. Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 2008;8:93–102.
  • 8. Cheek J, Garnham B, Quan J (2006) What’s in a number? Issues is providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res 16:423–435.
  • 9. Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT (2006) Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39:436–443.

Bibliometric analysis of composite resin restorations from 2000-2020

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 1 - 8, 25.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.990835

Öz

Aim: To indentify the most effective actors(authors, countries, and journals) about composite resin restorations in the period 2000-2020.
Material and Methods: An electronis research was conducted in the Scopus database by selecting the words ‘composite resin’ and ‘restoration and English language, article and review types, dentistry field. Their bibliometric data including publication title, authorship, citation count, citation dentistry, year of publication, country and institution of origin, journal of publication, study design, and keywords were extracted and analyzed.
Results and Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric article on composite resin restorations. This study provides information about authors, institutions and countries that contribute to significant improvements in composite resin restorations. From 2000 to 2020, there were 7118 articles published from 99 countries.Articles originate primarily from the USA and Brazil. Results indicate that the USA, Brazil, Germany, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Japan, Swtizerland, Italy, Netherlands and India are the leading countries in composite resin restoration research and account for 51.8% of the total number of publications. The total number of citations are 158.404, corresponding to 22 citations per paper publication. During the time period examined, 776 hot articles and 228 classic articles on composite resin restorations were found.The journal with the most publications is ‘Operative Dentistry’. The publishing houses of the top 10 journals are from 4 countries: USA(6),Netherlands(2),Germany(1),Japan(1). The most cited article within the boundaires of this study is Ferracane’s article titled ‘Resin composite-State of the art’, which was published in Dental Materials in 2011 and received 913 citations.
Conclusion: This article is the first known bibliometric analysis of composite resin restorations. Studies on composite resin restorations are increasing in parallel with the increasing demand for aesthetics. The analysis of the most influential factors of these publications will give an idea for the studies to be done.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Alexander G, Hopcraft MS, Tyas MJ, Wong R. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 3: Dentists' attitudes. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(4):502-513. 2. White BA, Maupomé G. Making clinical decisions for dental care: concepts to consider. Spec Care Dentist. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):168-72.
  • 3. Khalaf ME, Alomari QD, Ngo H, Doméjean S. Restorative treatment[19]thresholds: Factors influencing the treatment thresholds and modalitiesof general dentists in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2014; 23(4): 357-62.
  • 4. Baraba A, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Espelid I, Tveit AB, Miletic I.[20]Survey of Croatian dentists’ restorative treatment decisions onapproximal caries lesions. Croat Med J 2010; 51(6): 509-14.
  • 5. Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, et al. National Dental PBRN[21]Collaborative Group. Agreement among dentists’ restorative treatmentplanning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximalcaries, and existing restorations: Findings from The National DentalPractice-Based Research Network. J Dent 2013; 41(8): 718-25.
  • 6. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warz) 2009;57:13.
  • 7. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Neuhaus C, Daniel H-D. Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 2008;8:93–102.
  • 8. Cheek J, Garnham B, Quan J (2006) What’s in a number? Issues is providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res 16:423–435.
  • 9. Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT (2006) Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39:436–443.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Sultan Gizem Ülkü 0000-0002-3699-0662

Nimet Ünlü 0000-0002-6546-6368

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Mart 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Eylül 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Ülkü SG, Ünlü N (01 Mart 2022) Bibliometric analysis of composite resin restorations from 2000-2020. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 1 1–8.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.