Olgu Sunumu
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2021, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 105 - 112, 24.02.2021
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.796047

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Avulsions In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM (eds) Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. 1993 Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1993:282-420.
  • 2. Andreasen J, Ravn JJ. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J Oral Surg 1972;1(5):235-239.
  • 3. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp, ed 6St Louis Mosby, 1994;444
  • 4. Andreasen JO. Periodontal healing after replantation and autotransplantation of incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10(1):54-61.
  • 5. Andreasen JO. Traumatic dental injuries in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10(3):181.
  • 6. Malhotra N, Kundabala M, Rashmi S. A review of root fractures: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Dent Update 2011;38:39
  • 7. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Caldeira de Andrada MA. Tooth fracture reattachment: case reports. Quint Int 1990;21(4):261-270.
  • 8. Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriques Filho LE. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26(3):287-294.
  • 9. Baratieri LN, Monteiro Júnior S, de Albuquerque FM, Vieira LC, de Andrada MA, de Melo Filho JC. Reattachment of a tooth fragment with a "new" adhesive system: a case report. Quint Int 1994;25(2):91-96.
  • 10. Kumari NBPS, Sujana V, Sunil CHR, Reddy PS. Reattachment of complicated tooth fracture: an alternative approach. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;(3)2: 242–244.
  • 11. Akyuz SN, Erdemir A. Restoration of tooth fractures using fiber post and fragment reattachment: three case reports. Europ J of Gen Dent 2012;(1):2, 94–98.
  • 12. Mergulhão VA, de Mendonça LS, de Albuquerque MS, Braz R. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Oper Dent 2019;44(1):E1-E11.
  • 13. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva, L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80(5):527-532
  • 14. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13(Spec No):15B-18B.
  • 15. Adanir N, Belli S. Stress analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts. Eur J Dent 2007;1(2):67-71.
  • 16. Sargod SS, Bhat SS. A 9 year follow-up of a fractured tooth fragment reattachment. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1(4):243-245.
  • 17. Garcia FCP, Poubel DLN, Almeida JCF, Toledo IP, Poi WR, Guerra ENS, Rezende LVML. Tooth fragment reattachment techniques-A systematic review. Dent Traumatol 2018;34(3):135-143.
  • 18. Lise DP, Vieira LC, Araújo É, Lopes GC. Tooth fragment reattachment: the natural restoration. Oper Dent 2012;37(6):584-590.
  • 19. Davari A, Sadeghi M. Influence of different bonding agents and composite resins on fracture resistance of reattached incisal tooth fragment. J Dent 2014;15(1):6-14.
  • 20. Calişkan MK, Türkün M, Gomel M. Surgical extrusion of crown-root-fractured teeth: a clinical review. Int Endod J 1999;32(2):146-151.
  • 21. Macedo GV, Ritter AV. Essentials of rebonding tooth fragments for the best functional and esthetic outcomes. Pediatr Dent 2009;31(2):110-116.
  • 22. Sun YC, Li Y, Tong J, Gao P. An interdisciplinary approach to treat crown-root-fractured tooth. Niger Med J 2013;54(4):274-277.
  • 23. Bruschi-Alonso RC, Alonso RC, Correr GM, Alves MC, Lewgoy HR, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(4):315-322.
  • 24. Saumya, Dhingra R, Gupta A, Karunanand B. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Reattached Anterior Tooth Fragment Using Two Different Flowable Composites-An in vitro Study. Br J Med Med Res 2017;21:1-10
  • 25. Panchal D. A case report of uncomplicated crown fracture: tooth fragment reattachment. Br Dent J 2019;227(4):259-263A
  • 26. Nogueira Filho Gda R, Machion L, Teixeira FB, Pimenta LA, Sallum EA.Reattachment of an autogenous tooth fragment in a fracture with biologic width violation: a case report. Quintessence Int 2002;33(3):181-184.
  • 27. Eichelsbacher F, Denner W, Klaiber B, Schlagenhauf UJ. Periodontal status of teeth with crown-root fractures: results two years after adhesive fragment reattachment. Clin Periodontol 2009;36(10):905-911.
  • 28. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13(2):98-100.
  • 29. Figueinedo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta- analysis. J Endod 2015;41:309-316.
  • 30. Kulkarni VK, Sharma DS, Banda NR, Solanki M, Khandelwal V, Airen P. Clinical management of a complicated crown-root fracture using autogenous tooth fragment: A biological restorative approach. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4(1):84-87.
  • 31. Pusman E, Cehreli ZC, Altay N, Unver B, Saracbasi O, Ozgun G. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(1):9-15. 32. Capp CI, Roda MI, Tamaki R, Castanho GM, Camargo MA, de Cara AA. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol 2009;25(1):95-99.
  • 33. Shirani F, Malekipour MR, Sakhaei Manesh V, Aghaei F. Hydration and dehydration periods of crown fragments prior to reattachment. Oper Dent 2012;37(5):501-508. Clinical Trial.
  • 34. Al-Tayyan MH, Watts DC, Kurer HG, Qualtrough AJ. Is a "flexible" glass fiber-bundle dowel system as retentive as a "rigid" quartz fiber dowel system? J Prosthodont 2008;17(7):532-537.
  • 35. Altieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Patel AP. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(1):16-22.
  • 36. Petti S, Tarsitani G. Traumatic injuries to anterior teeth in Italian schoolchildren: prevalence and risk factors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12(6):294-297.
  • 37. Altun C, Tözüm TF, Güven G.J. Multidisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of a crown fracture with glass-fibre-reinforced composite: a case report. Can Dent Assoc 2008;74(4):363-6.

A multidisciplinary approach for the restoration of a crown-root fracture with the involvement of supracrestal attached tissues: a case report with 7 year follow up

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 105 - 112, 24.02.2021
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.796047

Öz

Restoration of crown-root fractures with the involvement of supracrestal attached tissues represents difficulties for clinicians, as these types of fractures require a multidisciplinary approach for adequate treatment and successful prognosis. Depending on the location of the fracture, different treatment approaches, such as periodontal crown lengthening procedures, rapid orthodontic or surgical root extrusion or tooth extraction followed by fragment reattachment, direct composite restorations, veneers, and crown restorations, have been indicated.
This case report describes the management and long-term follow-up of the reattachment of a crown-root fracture using unidirectional fiber reinforcement after periodontal crown lengthening. Clinical and radiographic examinations of the reattached tooth after 7 years revealed favourable functional, physiological, and aesthetic outcomes and healthy surrounding periodontal structures, showing the success of the multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Avulsions In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM (eds) Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. 1993 Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1993:282-420.
  • 2. Andreasen J, Ravn JJ. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J Oral Surg 1972;1(5):235-239.
  • 3. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp, ed 6St Louis Mosby, 1994;444
  • 4. Andreasen JO. Periodontal healing after replantation and autotransplantation of incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10(1):54-61.
  • 5. Andreasen JO. Traumatic dental injuries in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10(3):181.
  • 6. Malhotra N, Kundabala M, Rashmi S. A review of root fractures: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Dent Update 2011;38:39
  • 7. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Caldeira de Andrada MA. Tooth fracture reattachment: case reports. Quint Int 1990;21(4):261-270.
  • 8. Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriques Filho LE. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26(3):287-294.
  • 9. Baratieri LN, Monteiro Júnior S, de Albuquerque FM, Vieira LC, de Andrada MA, de Melo Filho JC. Reattachment of a tooth fragment with a "new" adhesive system: a case report. Quint Int 1994;25(2):91-96.
  • 10. Kumari NBPS, Sujana V, Sunil CHR, Reddy PS. Reattachment of complicated tooth fracture: an alternative approach. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;(3)2: 242–244.
  • 11. Akyuz SN, Erdemir A. Restoration of tooth fractures using fiber post and fragment reattachment: three case reports. Europ J of Gen Dent 2012;(1):2, 94–98.
  • 12. Mergulhão VA, de Mendonça LS, de Albuquerque MS, Braz R. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Oper Dent 2019;44(1):E1-E11.
  • 13. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva, L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80(5):527-532
  • 14. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13(Spec No):15B-18B.
  • 15. Adanir N, Belli S. Stress analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts. Eur J Dent 2007;1(2):67-71.
  • 16. Sargod SS, Bhat SS. A 9 year follow-up of a fractured tooth fragment reattachment. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1(4):243-245.
  • 17. Garcia FCP, Poubel DLN, Almeida JCF, Toledo IP, Poi WR, Guerra ENS, Rezende LVML. Tooth fragment reattachment techniques-A systematic review. Dent Traumatol 2018;34(3):135-143.
  • 18. Lise DP, Vieira LC, Araújo É, Lopes GC. Tooth fragment reattachment: the natural restoration. Oper Dent 2012;37(6):584-590.
  • 19. Davari A, Sadeghi M. Influence of different bonding agents and composite resins on fracture resistance of reattached incisal tooth fragment. J Dent 2014;15(1):6-14.
  • 20. Calişkan MK, Türkün M, Gomel M. Surgical extrusion of crown-root-fractured teeth: a clinical review. Int Endod J 1999;32(2):146-151.
  • 21. Macedo GV, Ritter AV. Essentials of rebonding tooth fragments for the best functional and esthetic outcomes. Pediatr Dent 2009;31(2):110-116.
  • 22. Sun YC, Li Y, Tong J, Gao P. An interdisciplinary approach to treat crown-root-fractured tooth. Niger Med J 2013;54(4):274-277.
  • 23. Bruschi-Alonso RC, Alonso RC, Correr GM, Alves MC, Lewgoy HR, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(4):315-322.
  • 24. Saumya, Dhingra R, Gupta A, Karunanand B. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Reattached Anterior Tooth Fragment Using Two Different Flowable Composites-An in vitro Study. Br J Med Med Res 2017;21:1-10
  • 25. Panchal D. A case report of uncomplicated crown fracture: tooth fragment reattachment. Br Dent J 2019;227(4):259-263A
  • 26. Nogueira Filho Gda R, Machion L, Teixeira FB, Pimenta LA, Sallum EA.Reattachment of an autogenous tooth fragment in a fracture with biologic width violation: a case report. Quintessence Int 2002;33(3):181-184.
  • 27. Eichelsbacher F, Denner W, Klaiber B, Schlagenhauf UJ. Periodontal status of teeth with crown-root fractures: results two years after adhesive fragment reattachment. Clin Periodontol 2009;36(10):905-911.
  • 28. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13(2):98-100.
  • 29. Figueinedo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta- analysis. J Endod 2015;41:309-316.
  • 30. Kulkarni VK, Sharma DS, Banda NR, Solanki M, Khandelwal V, Airen P. Clinical management of a complicated crown-root fracture using autogenous tooth fragment: A biological restorative approach. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4(1):84-87.
  • 31. Pusman E, Cehreli ZC, Altay N, Unver B, Saracbasi O, Ozgun G. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(1):9-15. 32. Capp CI, Roda MI, Tamaki R, Castanho GM, Camargo MA, de Cara AA. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol 2009;25(1):95-99.
  • 33. Shirani F, Malekipour MR, Sakhaei Manesh V, Aghaei F. Hydration and dehydration periods of crown fragments prior to reattachment. Oper Dent 2012;37(5):501-508. Clinical Trial.
  • 34. Al-Tayyan MH, Watts DC, Kurer HG, Qualtrough AJ. Is a "flexible" glass fiber-bundle dowel system as retentive as a "rigid" quartz fiber dowel system? J Prosthodont 2008;17(7):532-537.
  • 35. Altieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Patel AP. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(1):16-22.
  • 36. Petti S, Tarsitani G. Traumatic injuries to anterior teeth in Italian schoolchildren: prevalence and risk factors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12(6):294-297.
  • 37. Altun C, Tözüm TF, Güven G.J. Multidisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of a crown fracture with glass-fibre-reinforced composite: a case report. Can Dent Assoc 2008;74(4):363-6.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Case Reports
Yazarlar

Esra Can Say 0000-0003-3585-4949

Burcu Dikici

Gökser Çakar 0000-0002-8766-8120

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Şubat 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 24 Eylül 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Can Say E, Dikici B, Çakar G (01 Şubat 2021) A multidisciplinary approach for the restoration of a crown-root fracture with the involvement of supracrestal attached tissues: a case report with 7 year follow up. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24 1 105–112.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.