Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 160 - 166, 05.10.2020

Demet Altunbaş , Mustafa Toyoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.691090

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11:472-478.
  • 2. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457-460.
  • 3. Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, 3rd, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J Endod 1998;24:102-106.
  • 4. Parirokh M, Jalali S, Haghdoost AA, Abbott PV. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation. J Endod 2012;38:196-199.
  • 5. Yeter KY, Evcil MS, Ayranci LB, Ersoy I. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles. Int Endod J 2013;46:795-799.
  • 6. Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, Erdogan AS. Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting file system, Vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris. Int Endod J 2015;48:317-322.
  • 7. Borges AH, Pereira TM, Porto AN, de Araujo Estrela CR, Miranda Pedro FL, Aranha AM, Guedes OA. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems. J Endod 2016;42:465-469.
  • 8. Karatas E, Arslan H, Kirici DO, Alsancak M, Capar ID. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation. Int Endod J 2016;49:382-385.
  • 9. Silva EJ, Teixeira JM, Kudsi N, Sassone LM, Krebs RL, Coutinho-Filho TS. Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion. Braz Dent J 2016;27:28-31.
  • 10. Yared GM, Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002;35:7-12.
  • 11. Gambarini G. Advantages and disadvantages of new torque-controlled endodontic motors and low-torque NiTi rotary instrumentation. Aust Endod J 2001;27:99-104.
  • 12. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015;41:237-241.
  • 13. Cakici F, Cakici EB, Kucukekenci FF, Uygun AD, Arslan H. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and RECIPROC instruments. Int J Artif Organs 2016;39:128-131.
  • 14. Farmakis ET, Sotiropoulos GG, Abramovitz I, Solomonov M. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2131-2138.
  • 15. Silva EJ, Carapia MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. Int Endod J 2016;49:700-705.
  • 16. Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Siso SH, Altunbas D. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Eur J Dent 2008;2:233-239.
  • 17. Ozsu D, Karatas E, Arslan H, Topcu MC. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems. Eur J Dent 2014;8:504-508.
  • 18. X-Smart Torque Card. Available at: http://www.dentsply.com/content/dam/dentsply/pim/manufacturer/Endodontics/Motors__Apex_Locators/Motors/X_Smart_Endodontic_Rotary_Motor/X-Smart-Endodontic-Rotary-Motor-5yqat7i-en-1402. Accessed February 11, 2020.
  • 19. ProTaper Universal Guidelines and Pack Details. Available at: https://e-ecodent.gr/images/ProductsInfo/MAILLEFER/sequence.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2020.
  • 20. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17:275-279.
  • 21. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165.
  • 22. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Akti A. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe and ProTaper retreatment instruments in curved artificial canals. Int Endod J 2016;49:604-609.
  • 23. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219.
  • 24. Ha JH, Cheung GS, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kwak SW, Kim HC. 'Screw-in' tendency of rotary nickel-titanium files due to design geometry. Int Endod J 2015;48:666-672.

THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TORQUE SETTINGS ON THE AMOUNT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS DURING ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 160 - 166, 05.10.2020

Demet Altunbaş , Mustafa Toyoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.691090

Öz

Objectives: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the effect of low- and high-torque settings on the amount of apically extruded debris during canal preparation with the ProTaper Universal (PTU) system.
Materials and Methods: Forty extracted mandibular premolars were selected and randomly divided into two groups (n = 20). Each root canal was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using SX, S1, S2, F1, F2, and F3 at low-torque settings and high-torque settings. The apically extruded debris was collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The weight of extruded debris was determined, and data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test at a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: No significant difference was observed between the groups (p>0.05). The PTU system produced the higher mean extrusion value at high-torque settings.
Conclusions: Under the conditions of this study, as no difference among the different torque settings in terms of the amount of extruded debris were noted, it is possible to suggest that clinicians should choose the most appropriate settings for each case in clinical practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Endodontics Root canal preparation Torque

Kaynakça

  • 1. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11:472-478.
  • 2. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457-460.
  • 3. Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, 3rd, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J Endod 1998;24:102-106.
  • 4. Parirokh M, Jalali S, Haghdoost AA, Abbott PV. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation. J Endod 2012;38:196-199.
  • 5. Yeter KY, Evcil MS, Ayranci LB, Ersoy I. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles. Int Endod J 2013;46:795-799.
  • 6. Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, Erdogan AS. Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting file system, Vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris. Int Endod J 2015;48:317-322.
  • 7. Borges AH, Pereira TM, Porto AN, de Araujo Estrela CR, Miranda Pedro FL, Aranha AM, Guedes OA. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems. J Endod 2016;42:465-469.
  • 8. Karatas E, Arslan H, Kirici DO, Alsancak M, Capar ID. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation. Int Endod J 2016;49:382-385.
  • 9. Silva EJ, Teixeira JM, Kudsi N, Sassone LM, Krebs RL, Coutinho-Filho TS. Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion. Braz Dent J 2016;27:28-31.
  • 10. Yared GM, Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002;35:7-12.
  • 11. Gambarini G. Advantages and disadvantages of new torque-controlled endodontic motors and low-torque NiTi rotary instrumentation. Aust Endod J 2001;27:99-104.
  • 12. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015;41:237-241.
  • 13. Cakici F, Cakici EB, Kucukekenci FF, Uygun AD, Arslan H. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and RECIPROC instruments. Int J Artif Organs 2016;39:128-131.
  • 14. Farmakis ET, Sotiropoulos GG, Abramovitz I, Solomonov M. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2131-2138.
  • 15. Silva EJ, Carapia MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. Int Endod J 2016;49:700-705.
  • 16. Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Siso SH, Altunbas D. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Eur J Dent 2008;2:233-239.
  • 17. Ozsu D, Karatas E, Arslan H, Topcu MC. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems. Eur J Dent 2014;8:504-508.
  • 18. X-Smart Torque Card. Available at: http://www.dentsply.com/content/dam/dentsply/pim/manufacturer/Endodontics/Motors__Apex_Locators/Motors/X_Smart_Endodontic_Rotary_Motor/X-Smart-Endodontic-Rotary-Motor-5yqat7i-en-1402. Accessed February 11, 2020.
  • 19. ProTaper Universal Guidelines and Pack Details. Available at: https://e-ecodent.gr/images/ProductsInfo/MAILLEFER/sequence.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2020.
  • 20. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17:275-279.
  • 21. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165.
  • 22. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Akti A. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe and ProTaper retreatment instruments in curved artificial canals. Int Endod J 2016;49:604-609.
  • 23. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219.
  • 24. Ha JH, Cheung GS, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kwak SW, Kim HC. 'Screw-in' tendency of rotary nickel-titanium files due to design geometry. Int Endod J 2015;48:666-672.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Demet Altunbaş 0000-0002-7532-4785

Mustafa Toyoğlu 0000-0003-1248-6450

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Ekim 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Şubat 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Altunbaş D, Toyoğlu M (01 Ekim 2020) THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TORQUE SETTINGS ON THE AMOUNT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS DURING ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 23 3 160–166.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.