Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 116 - 123, 30.06.2020

Meltem Tekbaş Atay , Mediha Büyükgöze Dindar , Esra Özyurt , Aylin Çilingir , Uğur Erdemir

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.677099

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Brunsvold MA, Lane JJ. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1990;17(2):67-72.
  • 2. Al-Hamdan K. Prevalence of overhang interproximal amalgam restorations. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2008;28(2):245-47.
  • 3. Gilmore N, Sheiham A. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1971;42(1):8-12.
  • 4. Leon A. The periodontium and restorative procedures: A critical review. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 1977;4(2):105-17.
  • 5. Rodriguez‐Ferrer H, Strahan J, Newman H. Effect on gingival health of removing overhanging margins of interproximal subgingival amalgam restorations. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1980;7(6):457-62.
  • 6. Matvijenko VB, Živković MV, Mitić AD, Popović JZ, Kostić LB, Živković DM, et al. Effect of irregular interproximal dental restorations on periodontal status. Acta stomatologica Naissi. 2012;28(65):1144-54.
  • 7. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1983;10(6):563-78.
  • 8. Hakkarainen K, Ainamo J. Influence of overhanging posterior tooth restorations on alveolar bone height in adults. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1980;7(2):114-20.
  • 9. Nunn MEJP. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: an overview of periodontal risk factors. 2003;32(1):11-23.
  • 10. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban BJJoP. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. 1961;32(3):261-7.
  • 11. Broadbent JM, Williams KB, Thomson WM, Williams SM. Dental restorations: a risk factor for periodontal attachment loss? Journal of clinical periodontology. 2006;33(11):803-10.
  • 12. Padbury A, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2003;30(5):379-85.
  • 13. Chan D, Chung AK. Management of idiopathic subgingival amalgam hypertrophy–The common amalgam overhang. Operative dentistry. 2009;34(6):753-8.
  • 14. Matthews DC, Tabesh M. Detection of localized tooth‐related factors that predispose to periodontal infections. Periodontology 2000. 2004;34(1):136-50.
  • 15. Moncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro M, et al. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. General Dentistry. 2006;54(5):314.
  • 16. Quadir F, Abidi SYA, Ahmed SJJotCoP, Pakistan S. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students. 2014;24(7):485-8.
  • 17. Yasar F, Yesilova E, Akgünlü F. Alveolar bone changes under overhanging restorations. Clinical oral investigations. 2010;14(5):543-9.
  • 18. Pillai K, Hollist N. Randomized selection of bitewing radiographs: analysis and clinical thereof. Tropical dental journal. 1999:11-4.
  • 19. Al-Abdaly MMA, Khawshal AAQ, Alqisi AY, Al-shari HH, Alshahrani NF, Alshahrani ANJIJoCM. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures. 2018;9(01):39.
  • 20. Baharlooei K, Hashemi N, Azad M, Ansari Fard SJJoRiM, Science D. Evaluation the Overhang Rate in Class II Amalgam Restorations among Bandar Abbas Patients in 2015. 2018;6(1):151-6.
  • 21. Muryani A, Amaliya A, Garna DF, Oscandar F, Sukartini EJPJoD. Overhanging approximal restoration: Clinical and radiography features at Tarogong Public Health Service Indonesia. 2016;28(2).
  • 22. Vacaru R, Podariu AC, Jumanca D, Galuscan A, Muntean RJOHDMBS. Periodontal-restorative interrelationships. 2003;3:12-5.
  • 23. MJÖR, Ivar A. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2005;136(10): 1426-1433.
  • 24. Najm AA, Akram HM, Mahdi AS, Ali OHJHS. Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Associated with Overhang Amalgam Filling. 2018;7(1):11-6.
  • 25. Mokeem SAJPODJ. The impacts of amalgam overhang removal on periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid volume. 2007;27(1):17-22.
  • 26. Parsell D, Streckfus C, Stewart B, Buchanan WJOd. The effect of amalgam overhangs on alveolar bone height as a function of patient age and overhang width. 1998;23:94-9.
  • 27. Paolantonio M, Di CM, Cattabriga MJMs. Modifications in the clinical and microbiological parameters of the periodontal tissues after the removal of overhanging class-II amalgam fillings. 1990;39(8):697-701.
  • 28. Roman‐Torres CVG, Cortelli SC, de Araujo MWB, Aquino DR, Cortelli JRJJop. A short‐term clinical and microbial evaluation of periodontal therapy associated with amalgam overhang removal. 2006;77(9):1591-7.
  • 29. Pack AR, Coxhead LJ, McDonald BWJJocp. The prevalence of overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations and periodontal consequences. 1990;17(3):145-52.
  • 30. Tavangar M, Darabi F, Tayefeh Dr, Vadiati Sb, Jahandideh Y, Kazemnejad Le, et al. The prevalence of restoration overhang in patients referred to the dental clinic of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2016.
  • 31. Kuonen P, Huynh-Ba G, Krummen VS, Stössel EM, Röthlisberger B, Salvi GE, et al. Restoration margins in young adolescents: a clinical and radiographic study of Swiss Army recruits. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2009;7(4).
  • 32. Ibraheem AF, Al-Safi KAJJobcod. Prevalence of overhang margins in posterior amalgam restorations and alveolar bone resorption. 2005;17(1):11-3.
  • 33. Ahmad MZ, Gaikwad RN, Arjumand BJIJoDR. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial. 2018;29(4):459.
  • 34. Loomans B, Opdam N, Roeters F, Bronkhorst E, Huysmans MJJod. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations. 2009;37(9):712-7.
  • 35. Dinesh S, Priyadarshin S, Mohan SJPMR. Comparing metal and transparent matrices in preventing gingival overhang with different resin material in class-II restorations: a SEM study. 2010;5:26-7.

Frequency and Localization of Overhanging Restorations

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 116 - 123, 30.06.2020

Meltem Tekbaş Atay , Mediha Büyükgöze Dindar , Esra Özyurt , Aylin Çilingir , Uğur Erdemir

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.677099

Öz

Objectives:
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the
frequency and localization of the overhanging restorations by observing
patients’ routinely taken panoramic radiographs.



Materials and Methods: The
panoramic radiographs of 4,960 patients who applied to a dental clinic in
University between 2015 and 2016 and had one or more previous restorations were
retrospectively examined. The study group included 243 patients (133 females
and 110 males) with a mean age of 39.7 ± 12.5 years. Superposed interdental
areas were not evaluated. Frequency distributions and percentages were
calculated for the categorical data as to the surface of the maxillary-mandibular
premolar and molar teeth, also the presence or absence of root canal treatment.
Chi-square tests were used to compare data relating to the localization and
frequency of overhanging restorations.



Results:
In the radiological evaluation of 243 patients, a total of 280 overhanging
restorations were detected. Root canal treatment was present in 45.4% of the
teeth with an overhanging restoration. The frequency of overhanging
restorations in the maxilla was significantly higher (60.4%) than that of the mandible
(39.6%), (p<0.05). The frequency
of overhanging restorations in molar teeth (82.9%) was significantly higher
than that of premolar teeth (p<0.05).
Of all the overhanging restorations, 90.4% were in Class II cavities and 9.6%
were in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. More than half (57.3%) of the
overhanging margins in the Class II restorations were distal; 42.7% were mesial
surfaces (p<0.05). The most
frequent restorations with overhanging were found in the maxillary molars
(49.6%) and the least frequent were in the premolar teeth of the mandible (6.4%).
 



Conclusions:
The restorations with overhanging margins determined most often at the
disto-occlusal margins of the maxillary molars. The frequency of overhanging
restorations was higher in areas that are difficult to reach during treatment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Marginal Adaptation Dental Restoration Failure Permanent Dental Restoration Molar Panoramic Radiography

Kaynakça

  • 1. Brunsvold MA, Lane JJ. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1990;17(2):67-72.
  • 2. Al-Hamdan K. Prevalence of overhang interproximal amalgam restorations. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2008;28(2):245-47.
  • 3. Gilmore N, Sheiham A. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1971;42(1):8-12.
  • 4. Leon A. The periodontium and restorative procedures: A critical review. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 1977;4(2):105-17.
  • 5. Rodriguez‐Ferrer H, Strahan J, Newman H. Effect on gingival health of removing overhanging margins of interproximal subgingival amalgam restorations. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1980;7(6):457-62.
  • 6. Matvijenko VB, Živković MV, Mitić AD, Popović JZ, Kostić LB, Živković DM, et al. Effect of irregular interproximal dental restorations on periodontal status. Acta stomatologica Naissi. 2012;28(65):1144-54.
  • 7. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1983;10(6):563-78.
  • 8. Hakkarainen K, Ainamo J. Influence of overhanging posterior tooth restorations on alveolar bone height in adults. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1980;7(2):114-20.
  • 9. Nunn MEJP. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: an overview of periodontal risk factors. 2003;32(1):11-23.
  • 10. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban BJJoP. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. 1961;32(3):261-7.
  • 11. Broadbent JM, Williams KB, Thomson WM, Williams SM. Dental restorations: a risk factor for periodontal attachment loss? Journal of clinical periodontology. 2006;33(11):803-10.
  • 12. Padbury A, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2003;30(5):379-85.
  • 13. Chan D, Chung AK. Management of idiopathic subgingival amalgam hypertrophy–The common amalgam overhang. Operative dentistry. 2009;34(6):753-8.
  • 14. Matthews DC, Tabesh M. Detection of localized tooth‐related factors that predispose to periodontal infections. Periodontology 2000. 2004;34(1):136-50.
  • 15. Moncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro M, et al. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. General Dentistry. 2006;54(5):314.
  • 16. Quadir F, Abidi SYA, Ahmed SJJotCoP, Pakistan S. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students. 2014;24(7):485-8.
  • 17. Yasar F, Yesilova E, Akgünlü F. Alveolar bone changes under overhanging restorations. Clinical oral investigations. 2010;14(5):543-9.
  • 18. Pillai K, Hollist N. Randomized selection of bitewing radiographs: analysis and clinical thereof. Tropical dental journal. 1999:11-4.
  • 19. Al-Abdaly MMA, Khawshal AAQ, Alqisi AY, Al-shari HH, Alshahrani NF, Alshahrani ANJIJoCM. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures. 2018;9(01):39.
  • 20. Baharlooei K, Hashemi N, Azad M, Ansari Fard SJJoRiM, Science D. Evaluation the Overhang Rate in Class II Amalgam Restorations among Bandar Abbas Patients in 2015. 2018;6(1):151-6.
  • 21. Muryani A, Amaliya A, Garna DF, Oscandar F, Sukartini EJPJoD. Overhanging approximal restoration: Clinical and radiography features at Tarogong Public Health Service Indonesia. 2016;28(2).
  • 22. Vacaru R, Podariu AC, Jumanca D, Galuscan A, Muntean RJOHDMBS. Periodontal-restorative interrelationships. 2003;3:12-5.
  • 23. MJÖR, Ivar A. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2005;136(10): 1426-1433.
  • 24. Najm AA, Akram HM, Mahdi AS, Ali OHJHS. Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Associated with Overhang Amalgam Filling. 2018;7(1):11-6.
  • 25. Mokeem SAJPODJ. The impacts of amalgam overhang removal on periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid volume. 2007;27(1):17-22.
  • 26. Parsell D, Streckfus C, Stewart B, Buchanan WJOd. The effect of amalgam overhangs on alveolar bone height as a function of patient age and overhang width. 1998;23:94-9.
  • 27. Paolantonio M, Di CM, Cattabriga MJMs. Modifications in the clinical and microbiological parameters of the periodontal tissues after the removal of overhanging class-II amalgam fillings. 1990;39(8):697-701.
  • 28. Roman‐Torres CVG, Cortelli SC, de Araujo MWB, Aquino DR, Cortelli JRJJop. A short‐term clinical and microbial evaluation of periodontal therapy associated with amalgam overhang removal. 2006;77(9):1591-7.
  • 29. Pack AR, Coxhead LJ, McDonald BWJJocp. The prevalence of overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations and periodontal consequences. 1990;17(3):145-52.
  • 30. Tavangar M, Darabi F, Tayefeh Dr, Vadiati Sb, Jahandideh Y, Kazemnejad Le, et al. The prevalence of restoration overhang in patients referred to the dental clinic of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2016.
  • 31. Kuonen P, Huynh-Ba G, Krummen VS, Stössel EM, Röthlisberger B, Salvi GE, et al. Restoration margins in young adolescents: a clinical and radiographic study of Swiss Army recruits. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2009;7(4).
  • 32. Ibraheem AF, Al-Safi KAJJobcod. Prevalence of overhang margins in posterior amalgam restorations and alveolar bone resorption. 2005;17(1):11-3.
  • 33. Ahmad MZ, Gaikwad RN, Arjumand BJIJoDR. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial. 2018;29(4):459.
  • 34. Loomans B, Opdam N, Roeters F, Bronkhorst E, Huysmans MJJod. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations. 2009;37(9):712-7.
  • 35. Dinesh S, Priyadarshin S, Mohan SJPMR. Comparing metal and transparent matrices in preventing gingival overhang with different resin material in class-II restorations: a SEM study. 2010;5:26-7.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Meltem Tekbaş Atay 0000-0002-1762-830X

Mediha Büyükgöze Dindar 0000-0003-3794-4366

Esra Özyurt 0000-0003-4118-0450

Aylin Çilingir 0000-0002-9848-9136

Uğur Erdemir 0000-0002-4673-8284

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 24 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Tekbaş Atay M, Büyükgöze Dindar M, Özyurt E, Çilingir A, Erdemir U (01 Haziran 2020) Frequency and Localization of Overhanging Restorations. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 23 2 116–123.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.