Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2020,
Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 5 - 12, 18.03.2020
Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Maciel Filho MD, IJ Z-F, Linhares de Castro FP. Main Predictors of Root Canal Endodontical Treatment: Systematic Review. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2018;5(202):595-600.
- 2. Peters OA, Schonenberger K, A L. effects of Ni-Ti preparation technique on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34(3):221-230.
- 3. Jena A, Sahoo SK, Govind S. Root canal irrigants: a review of their interactions, benefits, and limitations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(4):256-261.
- 4. Ramachandra JA, Nihal NK, Nagarathna C, Vora MS. Root canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth. World J Dent. 2015;6(December):229-234.
- 5. Ismail S, Adyanthaya A, Sreelakshmi N. Intracanal irrigants in pediatric endodontics : A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3(4):246-251.
- 6. He L, Zhong J, Gong Q, et al. Treatment of Necrotic Teeth by Apical Revascularization: Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1-11.
- 7. Walsh LJ. Activation of Alkaline Irrigation Fluids in Endodontics. Materials (Basel). 2017;10:1-10.
- 8. Wright PP, Walsh LJ. Optimizing Antimicrobial Agents in Endodontics. (Kumavath RN, ed.). Croatia; 2017.
- 9. Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM, et al. New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(1):3-8.
- 10. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Medi Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-275.
- 11. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellestein JW. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short- term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 2003;29:647-648.
- 12. William S, Goldman M. penetrrabilty of the smeared layerby a strain of Proteus vulgaris. J Endod. 1985;11(5):385-388.
- 13. Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389-398.
- 14. Nair B, Reddy K. Advances in root canal disinfection. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2011;5(24):1-3.
- 15. Fogel H, Pashley D. Dentine pwemeability: effects of endodontic procedures on root slabs. J Endod. 1990;16(6):442-445.
- 16. Olivi G. Laser Use in Endodontics : Evolution from Direct Laser Irradiation to Laser-Activated Irrigation. J Laser dENT. 2013;21(2):58-71.
- 17. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical Extrusion of Root Canal Irrigants When Using Er : YAG and Er , Cr : YSGG Lasers with Optical Fibers : An In Vitro Dye Study. J Endod. 2008;34(6):706-708.
- 18. Schafer E, Bossmann K. antimicrobial efficacy of chlorohexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Entrococcus fecalis. J Endod. 2005;31(9):53-56.
- 19. Siqueira JF, Rocas I, Lopez H. patterns of microbial colonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2002;93(12):174-178.
- 20. Peters L, Wesselink P, Buijs J, Winkelholf A. viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2001;27(5):76-81.
- 21. Haapasalo M, Qrastavik D. in vitro infection and disinficton of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66(5):1375-1379.
- 22. Rajakumaran A, Ganesh A. Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Penetration of Root Canal Irrigant After Using Manual, Passive Ultrasonic, and Diode Laser-Assisted Irrigant Activation Technique. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S216-S220. doi:10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_300_18
- 23. Luder HU, Sener B, Zehnder M. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. 2006:18-25.
- 24. Davis SL. the effect of agitation on the penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules. 2013.
- 25. Castelo-baz P, Cantatore G, Ru M. In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation in Simulated Lateral Canals of Extracted Teeth. 2012;38(5):688-691. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.032
Evaluation of Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite Into Dentinal Tubules After Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Compared to Er;Yag Laser Activation. An In-Vitro Study
Öz
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare
penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules after passive
ultrasonic agitation or ER; YAG activated irrigant.
penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules after passive
ultrasonic agitation or ER; YAG activated irrigant.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-four single rooted human
mature mandibular premolars were decoronated and accessed. After locating the
apex and determining the working length, preparation of root canal was done up
to #35 file using Mtwo system and with 5.25 NaOCl irrigation. Teeth were then
sealed apically with wax and submerged in a crystal violet dye for 48 hours to
stain dentin. NaOCl Irrigation was activated with either Ultrasonic or ER;YAG laser.
Specimens were sectioned longitudinally and depth of bleached zone was
evaluated under a stereomicroscope 40X.
mature mandibular premolars were decoronated and accessed. After locating the
apex and determining the working length, preparation of root canal was done up
to #35 file using Mtwo system and with 5.25 NaOCl irrigation. Teeth were then
sealed apically with wax and submerged in a crystal violet dye for 48 hours to
stain dentin. NaOCl Irrigation was activated with either Ultrasonic or ER;YAG laser.
Specimens were sectioned longitudinally and depth of bleached zone was
evaluated under a stereomicroscope 40X.
Results: Penetration depth was significantly
higher in overall root canal in ultrasonic group than ER; YAG laser group (P=.000).
In ER;YAG Laser group, the highest penetration depth was in the coronal third
followed by middle and third, with significant difference between apical third
and both middle and coronal thirds (P=.009, .003 respectively), and no
significant difference between middle and coronal thirds (P=.083).
higher in overall root canal in ultrasonic group than ER; YAG laser group (P=.000).
In ER;YAG Laser group, the highest penetration depth was in the coronal third
followed by middle and third, with significant difference between apical third
and both middle and coronal thirds (P=.009, .003 respectively), and no
significant difference between middle and coronal thirds (P=.083).
Highest penetration depth was seen
in middle third for no significant deference in penetration depth between the
three thirds of the root canal activated with Ultrasonic (P=.664).
Conclusion: ultrasonic activation can lead to more NaOCl
penetration into dentinal tubules than activation with ER;YAG.
penetration into dentinal tubules than activation with ER;YAG.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Penetration Depth Passive Ultrasonic agitation ER;YAG Laser Activated Irrigant
Kaynakça
- 1. Maciel Filho MD, IJ Z-F, Linhares de Castro FP. Main Predictors of Root Canal Endodontical Treatment: Systematic Review. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2018;5(202):595-600.
- 2. Peters OA, Schonenberger K, A L. effects of Ni-Ti preparation technique on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34(3):221-230.
- 3. Jena A, Sahoo SK, Govind S. Root canal irrigants: a review of their interactions, benefits, and limitations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(4):256-261.
- 4. Ramachandra JA, Nihal NK, Nagarathna C, Vora MS. Root canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth. World J Dent. 2015;6(December):229-234.
- 5. Ismail S, Adyanthaya A, Sreelakshmi N. Intracanal irrigants in pediatric endodontics : A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3(4):246-251.
- 6. He L, Zhong J, Gong Q, et al. Treatment of Necrotic Teeth by Apical Revascularization: Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1-11.
- 7. Walsh LJ. Activation of Alkaline Irrigation Fluids in Endodontics. Materials (Basel). 2017;10:1-10.
- 8. Wright PP, Walsh LJ. Optimizing Antimicrobial Agents in Endodontics. (Kumavath RN, ed.). Croatia; 2017.
- 9. Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM, et al. New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(1):3-8.
- 10. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Medi Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-275.
- 11. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellestein JW. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short- term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 2003;29:647-648.
- 12. William S, Goldman M. penetrrabilty of the smeared layerby a strain of Proteus vulgaris. J Endod. 1985;11(5):385-388.
- 13. Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389-398.
- 14. Nair B, Reddy K. Advances in root canal disinfection. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2011;5(24):1-3.
- 15. Fogel H, Pashley D. Dentine pwemeability: effects of endodontic procedures on root slabs. J Endod. 1990;16(6):442-445.
- 16. Olivi G. Laser Use in Endodontics : Evolution from Direct Laser Irradiation to Laser-Activated Irrigation. J Laser dENT. 2013;21(2):58-71.
- 17. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical Extrusion of Root Canal Irrigants When Using Er : YAG and Er , Cr : YSGG Lasers with Optical Fibers : An In Vitro Dye Study. J Endod. 2008;34(6):706-708.
- 18. Schafer E, Bossmann K. antimicrobial efficacy of chlorohexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Entrococcus fecalis. J Endod. 2005;31(9):53-56.
- 19. Siqueira JF, Rocas I, Lopez H. patterns of microbial colonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2002;93(12):174-178.
- 20. Peters L, Wesselink P, Buijs J, Winkelholf A. viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2001;27(5):76-81.
- 21. Haapasalo M, Qrastavik D. in vitro infection and disinficton of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66(5):1375-1379.
- 22. Rajakumaran A, Ganesh A. Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Penetration of Root Canal Irrigant After Using Manual, Passive Ultrasonic, and Diode Laser-Assisted Irrigant Activation Technique. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S216-S220. doi:10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_300_18
- 23. Luder HU, Sener B, Zehnder M. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. 2006:18-25.
- 24. Davis SL. the effect of agitation on the penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules. 2013.
- 25. Castelo-baz P, Cantatore G, Ru M. In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation in Simulated Lateral Canals of Extracted Teeth. 2012;38(5):688-691. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.032
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 18 Mart 2020 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 25 Kasım 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.