Öz
Kaynakça
- Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e64-70.
- Valentini F, Oliveira SG, Guimaraes GZ, Barbosa RP, Moraes RR. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability of composite resin restorations. Braz Dent J 2011;22(5):365-8.
- Soncini, J. A., Maserejian, N. N., Trachtenberg, F., Tavares, M., & Hayes, C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2007; 138(6), 763-772.
- 4. Toledano M., De La Torre F.J. and Osorio R.: Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites, Am J Dent 1994;7:328-30.
- 5. Shintani H., Satou J., Satou N., Hatashihara H. and Inoue T.: Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins, Dent Mater 1985;1: 225-7.
- 6.Van Dijken, J. W. V., & Sjöström, S. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clinical oral investigations 1998; 2(4), 180-183.
- 7. Vieira A, Lugtenborg M, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Brushing abrasion of eroded bovine enamel pretreated with topical fluorides. Caries Res. 2006; 40: 224-30.
- 8. Geurtsen W., Leyhausen G. and Garcia Godoy F.: Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”). Dent Mater 1999; 15: 196-201.
- 9.Honório HM, Rios D, Francisconi LF, Magalhães AC, Machado MA, Buzalaf MA. Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:947–953.
- 10. Munack J, Haubert H, Dogan S, Geurtsen W. Effects of various storage media on surface hardness and structure of four polyacidmodified composite resins ("compomers") Clin Oral Investig. 2001;5:254–259.
- 11. Yanikoglu N, Duymus ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:344–351. 12.Çoğulu D, Ersin N, Topaloğlu AA. Asitli içeceklerin üç farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey sertliği üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Dicle Diş Hek Derg 2008; 9: 7-12.
- 13Kaur, H., & Nandlal, B. Effect of dietary solvents on the strength of nanocomposite, compomer, glass ionomer cement: An in-vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2013;16(6), 527.
- 14. Aliping-Mckenzie M, Linden RWA, Nicholson JW. The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and ‘compomers’. J Oral Reh 2004; 31: 1046-1052.
- 15.Yanikoğlu N, Duymuş ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 344-351. 16.Maupomé G, Díez-de-Bonilla J, Torres-Villaseñor G, AndradeDelgado LC, Castaño VM. In vitro quantitative assessment of enamel microhardness after exposure to eroding immersion in a cola drink. Caries Res.1998; 32: 148-153.
- 17.Kavaklı, K., Yılmaz, D., Çetinkaya, B., Balkan, C., Sözmen, E. Y., & Sağın, F. G. Safety profiles of Fe2+ and Fe3+ oral preparations in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children. Pediatric hematology and oncology 2004 21(5), 403-410.
Öz
Objectives: The
objective of this study is to examine the effect of nutrients and medicines
frequently consumed by children on the surface roughness of the
Polyacid-Modified Composite Resin (compomer), a restorative material
typically used in pediatric dentistry.
Materials and Methods: VOCO
Glasiosite® Caps compomer was used as the restoration material. Seven control
groups consisting of nutrients and medicines frequently consumed by children
from 0-6 years (Group 1: Ferro Sanol® B (150 ml) syrup, Group 2: Augmentin®-BID
(400 mg/57 mg) suspension, Group 3: Calpol® (120 mg/150 ml ), Group 4: Bebelac®
Gold 5 follow-on milk, Group 5: Danino® strawberry yogurt, Group 6: Nesquik®
chocolate milk, Group 7: Cappy® orange juice) were formed and their pH values
were measured. Compomer discs were created and their initial surface roughness
was measured by Bruker® Stylus Profilometer. Taking into consideration its
annual usage period, compomer material was brought in contact with
solutions. Then the roughness test was repeated. SEM images of each compomer
material were taken and compared with the control group.
Results: The evaluation
of the medicine group revealed that Ferro Sanol® B displays the highest level
of surface roughness difference (23.3 nm). As to the nutrients group, Cappy®
orange juice showed the highest surface roughness difference (21.4 nm). SEM
images support these findings.
Conclusions: The effect of
the solutions on the surface roughness of filling surfaces increases depending
on their acidity. However, it is believed that pH solely does not have any
impact. These studies should be supported by corrosion experiments.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Gonulol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e64-70.
- Valentini F, Oliveira SG, Guimaraes GZ, Barbosa RP, Moraes RR. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability of composite resin restorations. Braz Dent J 2011;22(5):365-8.
- Soncini, J. A., Maserejian, N. N., Trachtenberg, F., Tavares, M., & Hayes, C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2007; 138(6), 763-772.
- 4. Toledano M., De La Torre F.J. and Osorio R.: Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites, Am J Dent 1994;7:328-30.
- 5. Shintani H., Satou J., Satou N., Hatashihara H. and Inoue T.: Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins, Dent Mater 1985;1: 225-7.
- 6.Van Dijken, J. W. V., & Sjöström, S. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clinical oral investigations 1998; 2(4), 180-183.
- 7. Vieira A, Lugtenborg M, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Brushing abrasion of eroded bovine enamel pretreated with topical fluorides. Caries Res. 2006; 40: 224-30.
- 8. Geurtsen W., Leyhausen G. and Garcia Godoy F.: Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”). Dent Mater 1999; 15: 196-201.
- 9.Honório HM, Rios D, Francisconi LF, Magalhães AC, Machado MA, Buzalaf MA. Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:947–953.
- 10. Munack J, Haubert H, Dogan S, Geurtsen W. Effects of various storage media on surface hardness and structure of four polyacidmodified composite resins ("compomers") Clin Oral Investig. 2001;5:254–259.
- 11. Yanikoglu N, Duymus ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:344–351. 12.Çoğulu D, Ersin N, Topaloğlu AA. Asitli içeceklerin üç farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey sertliği üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Dicle Diş Hek Derg 2008; 9: 7-12.
- 13Kaur, H., & Nandlal, B. Effect of dietary solvents on the strength of nanocomposite, compomer, glass ionomer cement: An in-vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2013;16(6), 527.
- 14. Aliping-Mckenzie M, Linden RWA, Nicholson JW. The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and ‘compomers’. J Oral Reh 2004; 31: 1046-1052.
- 15.Yanikoğlu N, Duymuş ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 344-351. 16.Maupomé G, Díez-de-Bonilla J, Torres-Villaseñor G, AndradeDelgado LC, Castaño VM. In vitro quantitative assessment of enamel microhardness after exposure to eroding immersion in a cola drink. Caries Res.1998; 32: 148-153.
- 17.Kavaklı, K., Yılmaz, D., Çetinkaya, B., Balkan, C., Sözmen, E. Y., & Sağın, F. G. Safety profiles of Fe2+ and Fe3+ oral preparations in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children. Pediatric hematology and oncology 2004 21(5), 403-410.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Mayıs 2019 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 27 Aralık 2018 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.