Comparative assessment of resistance to enamel demineralization after orthodontic banding with three different cements- An in vitro study.
Öz
Objectives: This in vitro study was to compare the resistance to enameldemineralization after banding with three orthodontic cements, namely ZincPhosphate (Harvard Cement), ZincPolycarboxylate (Poly-F, Densply) and ResinModified Glass Ionomer Cement [RMGI] (Ortho Band Pak, GC Fuji).Materials and Methods: 80 premolarswere selected which were cleaned, dried and divided into four groups of 20each. Group A was a Control group. Group B, C and D were banded with thestainless steel bands using the respective cements. The teeth were then placedin deionized water for one month. They were debanded, cleaned and placed inartificial demineralizing solution for four weeks. Later they were cleaned andplaced in methylene blue for 24 hours to check the amount of demineralization. Theteeth were cut buccolingually and observed under the Motic Image Digital microscope.For analysis, the depth of dye penetration was measured in µm, which wasconsidered as equal to the depth of demineralization. Results: RMGI cement group showedsignificantly lesser amount of demineralization (6.679 ±3.016µm) compared to the Zinc Polycarboxylate cementgroup (18.0838± 5.833µm). The Zinc Phosphate cement group(55.360±8.667µm) andthe Control group(76.722± 18.832µm) demonstrated the greatest depth of enameldemineralization. Overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference(F=187.97, p<0.001).Conclusion: RMGI can be safely usedfor banding as it shows greater amount of resistance for enamel demineralization.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Banding cements RMGI enamel resistance enamel demineralization Zinc Polycarboxylate Zinc Phosphate Orthodontic cement plaque preventive strategy.
Kaynakça
- Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:10–14. Behnan SM, Arruda AO, Gonzálezcabezas C, Sohn W, Peters MC. Invitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod
- Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:712– 7
- Gorelick A, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. White spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-98.
- Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1983;84:323-331.
- Øgaard B, Rİlla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
- Benson PE, Millet DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. -Flourides, Orthodontics and Demineralization; a systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102-114.
- Vorhies AB, Donly KJ, Staley RN, Wefel JS. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:668-674.
- Donly KJ, Istre S, Istre T. In vitro enamel remineralization at orthodontic band margins cemented with glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:461-464.
- Shannon IL. Comparison of orthodontic cements containing sodium fluoride or stannous fluoride. Am J Orthod1980; 78:640-645.
- Foley T, Aggarwal M, HatibovicKofman S. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:526– 5
- Alexander SA, Ripa LW. Effects of self-applied topical Fluoride preparations in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2000;70:424–430.
- Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009;3:127–134. de Moura MS, de Melo Simplicio AH, Cury JA. In-vivo effects of fluoridated antiplaque dentifrice and bonding material on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:357– 36
- HamulaW, Hamula DW, Brower K. Glass lonomer Update. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:420-425.
- Norris DS, Mclnnes-Ledoux P, Schwaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements. Am J Orthod 1986;89:206-211.
- Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Arends J. An in vivo study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:16216
- Aggarwal M, Foley TF, Rix D. A Comparison of Shear- Peel Band Strengths of 5 Orthodontic Cements. Angle Orthod 2000;70:308–316. Paschos E, Kleinschrodt E, Luedemann TC, Huth K C, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:603–612.
- Kashani M, Farhadi S, Rastegarfard N. Comparison of the Effect of Three Cements on Prevention of Enamel Demineralization Adjacent to Orthodontic Bands. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2012;6:89–93.
- Rohilla M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N. Why the carioprotective potential of luting cements crucial? J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2009;27:219-223.
- Basdra EK, Huber H, Komposch G. Fluoride released from orthodontic bonding agents alters the enamel surface and inhibits enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:466–472.
- Silverstone LM. Fluorides and remineralization in clinical uses of fluorides. In: Weis HY, editor. A state of the art conference on the uses of fluorides in clinical dentistry. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 153-75.
- Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.
- Shimazu K, Ogata K, Karibe H. Evaluation of the caries-preventive effect of three orthodontic band cements in terms of fluoride release, retentiveness, and microleakage. Dent Mater J 2013;32:376-380.
- Prabhakar AR, Mahantesh T, Ahuja V. Comparison of retention and demineralization inhibition potential of adhesive banding cements in primary teeth. J Dent Child 2010;77:66-71.
- Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Kubo S, Tyas MJ. Morphological study of demineralized dentine after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 2002;47:1161
Öz
Kaynakça
- Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:10–14. Behnan SM, Arruda AO, Gonzálezcabezas C, Sohn W, Peters MC. Invitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod
- Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:712– 7
- Gorelick A, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. White spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-98.
- Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1983;84:323-331.
- Øgaard B, Rİlla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
- Benson PE, Millet DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. -Flourides, Orthodontics and Demineralization; a systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102-114.
- Vorhies AB, Donly KJ, Staley RN, Wefel JS. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:668-674.
- Donly KJ, Istre S, Istre T. In vitro enamel remineralization at orthodontic band margins cemented with glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:461-464.
- Shannon IL. Comparison of orthodontic cements containing sodium fluoride or stannous fluoride. Am J Orthod1980; 78:640-645.
- Foley T, Aggarwal M, HatibovicKofman S. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:526– 5
- Alexander SA, Ripa LW. Effects of self-applied topical Fluoride preparations in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2000;70:424–430.
- Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009;3:127–134. de Moura MS, de Melo Simplicio AH, Cury JA. In-vivo effects of fluoridated antiplaque dentifrice and bonding material on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:357– 36
- HamulaW, Hamula DW, Brower K. Glass lonomer Update. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:420-425.
- Norris DS, Mclnnes-Ledoux P, Schwaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements. Am J Orthod 1986;89:206-211.
- Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Arends J. An in vivo study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:16216
- Aggarwal M, Foley TF, Rix D. A Comparison of Shear- Peel Band Strengths of 5 Orthodontic Cements. Angle Orthod 2000;70:308–316. Paschos E, Kleinschrodt E, Luedemann TC, Huth K C, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:603–612.
- Kashani M, Farhadi S, Rastegarfard N. Comparison of the Effect of Three Cements on Prevention of Enamel Demineralization Adjacent to Orthodontic Bands. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2012;6:89–93.
- Rohilla M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N. Why the carioprotective potential of luting cements crucial? J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2009;27:219-223.
- Basdra EK, Huber H, Komposch G. Fluoride released from orthodontic bonding agents alters the enamel surface and inhibits enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:466–472.
- Silverstone LM. Fluorides and remineralization in clinical uses of fluorides. In: Weis HY, editor. A state of the art conference on the uses of fluorides in clinical dentistry. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 153-75.
- Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.
- Shimazu K, Ogata K, Karibe H. Evaluation of the caries-preventive effect of three orthodontic band cements in terms of fluoride release, retentiveness, and microleakage. Dent Mater J 2013;32:376-380.
- Prabhakar AR, Mahantesh T, Ahuja V. Comparison of retention and demineralization inhibition potential of adhesive banding cements in primary teeth. J Dent Child 2010;77:66-71.
- Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Kubo S, Tyas MJ. Morphological study of demineralized dentine after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 2002;47:1161
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 2 Mayıs 2014 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 20 Eylül 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2014Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.