BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Renk körü ve renk körü olmayan diş hekimlerinin renk seçimindeki başarı oranlarının değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 320 - 326, 29.05.2012
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1581

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assesment of normal color vision and color vision-deficient dentists success ratio on color evaluation.

Materials and Methods: Dentists who have minimum 3 years clinical experience and between 26-63 years old (n=90) were included for this study. Ishihara color blindness test was applied in all dentists before the test applying. Two pieces from each color totally 32 (13 mm x 2.4 mm) porcelain specimens were fabricated. There were 32 tabs were to be matched; the

dentists were asked to mark the correct color code

Results: Success rate of matching colors of color blind dentists was 33.92% ratio. The ratio in color vision dentists was 60.09%. Normal color vision dentists showed highest degree in matching at A3.5, B3, C4, D2 colors. Color vision-deficient dentists were unsuccessful in matching A1, B1, C1, B2, D2, A3 colors.

Conclusions: Color vision-deficient dentists were less succesfull than normal color vision dentists in color matching.

Keywords: Dentist, color blind, color selection.

 

ÖZET

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, renk körü ve renk körü olmayan diş hekimlerinin renk seçimindeki başarı oranlarının değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: En az 3 sene klinik deneyimi olan, yaşları 26 ile 63 arasındaki diş hekimleri (n=90) çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Test uygulaması yapılmadan önce tüm bireylere İshihara renk körlüğü testi uygulanmıştır. Ivoclar Klasik renk skalası referans alınarak, her bir renkten 2 şer adet olmak üzere toplam 32 adet disk (13 mm x 2,4 mm) hazırlandı. Aynı renkte olan porselen örneklerin eşleştirilmesi istendi.

Bulgular: Renk körü olan hekimler renkleri eşleştirmede başarı oranı 33,92 % dir. Renk körü olmayan diş hekimlerinde ise bu oran 60,09% dur. Renk körü olmayan diş hekimleri renk eşleştirmesinde sırasıyla A3.5, B3, C4, D2 renklerinde yüksek oranda başarı sağlamışlardır. Renk körü olan hekimler ise A1, B1, C1, B2, D2, A3 renklerinin eşleştirmesinde başarılı olamamışlardır.

Sonuç: Renk körü olan hekimler renk seçiminde, renk körü olmayan hekimlere göre daha başarısız olmuşlardır.

Kaynakça

  • Chu SJ. Color. In: Gurel G, ed. The science and art of porcelain laminate veneers. Istanbul: Quintessence, :159-162. Geary JL, Kinirons MJ. Colour perception samples of body coloured ceramic. J Dent 1999;27:145-148.
  • Amit V Naik, Ranjana C Pai. Color blindness in dental students and staff- an obstacle in shade selection for restorations. Annals Essences Dent 2010;2(3):25-28.
  • Sim CPC, Yap AUJ, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435- laboratory-fired
  • Lee YK, Yoon TH, Lim BS, Kim CW, Powers JM. Effects of colour measuring mode and light source on the color of shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:1099-1107.
  • Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental ;26:547-554. Cal E, Sonugelen M, Guneri P, Kesercioglu A, Kose T. Application of a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:483-491.
  • Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual matching. ;80:642-648. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J, Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics th ed. 2006:709-726.
  • Van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155
  • Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. applications for the organization of color. 1973. J Prosthet Dent ;86:458-464.
  • Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Shade determination and communication: A team approach. In: Perspectives in dental ceramics Ed.: Jack D. Preston, Chicago: Quintessence, 1988:279
  • Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Restorative Dent. 2003;23:467-479.
  • Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby,2004:26,139,142.
  • Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby,2006:709
  • O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publishing Co, :24-33. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32:3-12.
  • Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiberoptic colorimeter for an in vivo color measurement of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent ;58:535-542.
  • Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Threedimensional color coordinates of naturalteeth compared with three shade guides. J Prosthet Dent ;64:425-431. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle spectrophotometric shade analysis of human ;81:578-582. Rosenthal O, Phillips RH. Coping with color blindness. New York, NY, Avery, 1997:51-82.
  • Moser JB, Wozniak WT, Naleway CK, Ayer WA. Color vision in dentistry: A survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:509-510.
  • Davison SP, Myslinski NR. Shade selection by color vision defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent ;63:97-101. Ishihara P. Ishihara’s tests for colour- blindness. 38 ed. Japan: Kanelare Shuppan co ltd., 1990:3-8.
  • Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM. Variation in color between intended fabricated shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:657-666. Commission l’Eclairage
  • Official recommendations of the Commission l’Eclairage. CIE Publication No. 15 de (E- 1.3.1) Vienna (Austria): Bureau Central de la CIE, 1996;32-33.
  • Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison between conventional visual methods Quintessence Int 2009;40:69-79.
  • Doğan A, Yüzügüllü B. Renk seçiminde gelişmeler. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011:65-72 Supplement: 4.
  • Chu S Devigus A, Mieleszko A. Fundementals of color. Quintessence Publishing, 2004:121-123.
  • Hoc CK. Shade Selection. Aust Dent Prac 2007:116-119.
  • Nagai SI, Yoshida A, Sakai M. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent ;37:57-63. Barret AA, Grimaudo NJ, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dentalporcelain. J Prosthet Dent ;88:591-597. Bolt JC.Influence of window size in smallwindow color measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol ;39:1133-1142.
  • Dagg H, O'Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:900-904. selection. güncel teknolojik Bosch JJ, Coops
  • Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:391-396.
  • Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:50
  • Klemetti E, Matela AM, Haag P, Kononen performed professionals and colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:31-35.
  • Gokce HS, Piskin B, Ceyhan D, Gokce SM, Arisan V. Shade matching performance of normal and color professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103(3):139-147.
  • Yüzügüllü B, Çınar D, Toprak S, Şentürk Y, Yapıcı DE, İnan H. Başkent üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi öğrencileri ile restoratif diş hekimleri arasında renk eşleştirme yetilerinin Hacettepe Diş Hek ;32:356-363. Davison SP, Myslinski NR. Shade selection by color vision defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent ;63:97-101. selection by novice dental vision-deficient dental karşılaştırılması. Fak Derg
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Serdar Polat

Ali Rıza Tunçdemir

Caner Öztürk

Makbule Tunçdemir

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Mayıs 2012
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Mayıs 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Polat S, Tunçdemir AR, Öztürk C, Tunçdemir M (01 Ekim 2012) Renk körü ve renk körü olmayan diş hekimlerinin renk seçimindeki başarı oranlarının değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 15 4 320–326.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.