BibTex RIS Cite

Microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations after conventional diamond bur and Er, Cr:YSGG laser preparation

Year 2012, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 216 - 228, 29.02.2012

Ozgul Baygin , Tamer Tuzuner , Fatih Oznurhan , İpek Arslan

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1416

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compared the microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser or conventional diamond bur.

Materials and Methods: Ninety sound primary molar teeth were randomly assigned to the six study groups, pretreated as follows: Group1:2W-10Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation; Group2:2W-20Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation; Group3:2,5W-10Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation; Group4:2,5W-20Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation; Group5: 3W-10Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation; and Group6:3W laser-20Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation. Each tooth hosted one test cavity prepared with one of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation and one control cavity prepared with a conventional diamond bur in a high-speed hand piece. Both cavities were placed at the cervical margin of the tooth and were restored and finished according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the restorations were subjected to thermocycling and load cycling. Microleakage was assessed using 0.5% basic-fuchsin solution and the specimens were sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Dye penetration was scored based upon the extent of the dye using a stereo-microscope. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in microleakage (p>0.05) at either enamel or dentine margins among experimental groups. Lased groups resulted with statistically significant less microleakage compared to controls at both enamel and dentine margins in Groups 4 and 6 (p<0.05).

Conclusions: 2,5W-20Hz and 3W-20Hz Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation may be an alternative to the conventional diamond bur for prevention of microleakage of compomer restorations.

Keywords

Er Cr:YSGG laser diamond bur compomer microleakage.

References

  • Renson CE. Changing patterns of dental caries: a survey of 20 countries. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1986; 15: 284-298.
  • Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 2-9.
  • Vicente A, Ortiz AJ, Parra PL, Calvo JL, Chiva F. Microleakage in class V composite and compomer restorations following exposure to a colutory prescribed for the treatment of xerostomy. Odontology 2011; 99: 49-54.
  • Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
  • Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006; 24: 15-18.
  • Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD. Microleakage of class V compomer and light cured glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthet Dentist 1998; 79: 261-263.
  • Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 172-175.
  • Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 296-304.
  • Da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 372-376.
  • Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: a review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 33-44.
  • Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 529-539.
  • Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 64-69.
  • Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 356-361.
  • Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, Lampert F. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er, Cr: YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med 2001; 28: 371-374.
  • Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De SA Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1008-1014.
  • Berggren U, Meynart G. Dental fear and avoidance; causes, symptoms and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 116: 641-647.
  • Rankin JA, Harris MB. Dental anxiety: the patient’s point of view. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109: 43-47.
  • Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, Raab WH. Erbium: YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 1998; 26: 649-656.
  • Roebuck EM, Whitters CJ, Saunders WP. The influence of three Erbium: YAG laser energies on the in vitro microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 49-56.
  • Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 263-268.
  • Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto K. Effects of Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin: ablation and morphological studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17: 155-159.
  • Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent 1998; 26: 355-359.
  • Saunders WP, Strang R, Ahmad I. Effect of Mirage Bond primer on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 211-213.
  • Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 39-46.
  • Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 283–289.
  • Yip HK, Samaranayake LP. Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2: 148-154.
  • Baygin O, Korkmaz F, Tuzuner T, Tanrver MThe effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2011; doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0918.
  • Gonzales MA. Comparison of four microleakage tests. MSD thesis university of Indiana, Indianapolis. In: Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations:a review. Oper Dent 1992; 22: 173-185.
  • Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canalda C. Microleakage of fissure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 231-235.
  • Morabito A, Defabianis P. Marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dentist 1997; 22: 51-54.
  • Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Schulte Mönting J. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 148-152.
  • Germán Cecilia C, García Ballesta C, Cortés Lillo O, Pérez Lajarín L. Shear bond strength of a self-etching adhesive in primary and permanent dentition. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 331-334.
  • Gursoy T, Kazak M, Gokce K, Benderli Y. Microleakage of class I and V resin composite restorations after bur or Er, Cr:YSGG laser preparation. J Oral Laser Appl 2003; 3: 229-223.
  • Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki Y, Matsumoto K. A Study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 2003; 18: 25-31.
  • Khan MF, Yonaga K, Kimura Y, Funato A, Matsumoto K. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser using three types of restorative materials. Clin Laser Med Surg 1988; 16: 305-308.
  • Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo CP. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er: YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 37: 172-177.
  • Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 340-346.
  • Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er: YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 491-497.
  • Kawahara H, Yamagami A. In vitro studies of cellular responses to heat and vibration in cavity preparation. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 829-835.
  • Takamori K, Frukawa H, Morikawa Y, Katayama T, Watanabe S Basic study on vibrations during tooth preparations caused by high-speed drilling and Er: YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 32: 25-31.
  • Matson JR, Matson E, Navarro RS, Bocangel JS, Jaeger RG, Eduardo CP. Er: YAG laser effects on enamel occlusal fissures: an in vitro study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002; 20: 27-35.
  • Klinke T, Klimm W, Gutknecht N. Antibacterial effects of Nd: YAG laser irradiation within root canal dentin. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997; 15: 29-31.
  • Schoop U, Kluger W, Moritz A, Nedjelik N, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W. Bactericidal effect of different laser systems in the deep layers of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35: 111-116.
  • Bertrand MF, Hessleyer D, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface after Er: YAG laser preparation. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35: 51-57.
  • Delme KI, Deman PJ, Nammour S, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er: YAG laser preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 2006; 24: 715-722.
  • De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium: YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 322-329.
  • Lin S, Caputo AA, Eversole LR, Rizoiu I. Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 451-455.
  • Ekworapoj P, Sidhu SK, Mc Cabe JF. Effect of different power parameters of Er, Cr: YSGG laser on human dentine. Lasers Med Sci 2007; 22: 175-182.
  • Geraldo-Martins VR, Robles FR, Matos AB. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er: YAG laser cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 26-33.
  • Niu W, Eto JN, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K. A study on microleakage after resin filling of Class V cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16: 227-231.
  • Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of the use of Er: YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 430-436.

Year 2012, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 216 - 228, 29.02.2012

Ozgul Baygin , Tamer Tuzuner , Fatih Oznurhan , İpek Arslan

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1416

Abstract

References

  • Renson CE. Changing patterns of dental caries: a survey of 20 countries. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1986; 15: 284-298.
  • Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 2-9.
  • Vicente A, Ortiz AJ, Parra PL, Calvo JL, Chiva F. Microleakage in class V composite and compomer restorations following exposure to a colutory prescribed for the treatment of xerostomy. Odontology 2011; 99: 49-54.
  • Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
  • Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006; 24: 15-18.
  • Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD. Microleakage of class V compomer and light cured glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthet Dentist 1998; 79: 261-263.
  • Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 172-175.
  • Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 296-304.
  • Da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 372-376.
  • Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: a review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 33-44.
  • Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 529-539.
  • Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 64-69.
  • Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 356-361.
  • Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, Lampert F. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er, Cr: YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med 2001; 28: 371-374.
  • Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De SA Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1008-1014.
  • Berggren U, Meynart G. Dental fear and avoidance; causes, symptoms and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 116: 641-647.
  • Rankin JA, Harris MB. Dental anxiety: the patient’s point of view. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109: 43-47.
  • Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, Raab WH. Erbium: YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 1998; 26: 649-656.
  • Roebuck EM, Whitters CJ, Saunders WP. The influence of three Erbium: YAG laser energies on the in vitro microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 49-56.
  • Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 263-268.
  • Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto K. Effects of Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin: ablation and morphological studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17: 155-159.
  • Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent 1998; 26: 355-359.
  • Saunders WP, Strang R, Ahmad I. Effect of Mirage Bond primer on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 211-213.
  • Salama FS, Al-Hammad NS. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 39-46.
  • Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 283–289.
  • Yip HK, Samaranayake LP. Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2: 148-154.
  • Baygin O, Korkmaz F, Tuzuner T, Tanrver MThe effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2011; doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0918.
  • Gonzales MA. Comparison of four microleakage tests. MSD thesis university of Indiana, Indianapolis. In: Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations:a review. Oper Dent 1992; 22: 173-185.
  • Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canalda C. Microleakage of fissure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 231-235.
  • Morabito A, Defabianis P. Marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dentist 1997; 22: 51-54.
  • Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Schulte Mönting J. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 148-152.
  • Germán Cecilia C, García Ballesta C, Cortés Lillo O, Pérez Lajarín L. Shear bond strength of a self-etching adhesive in primary and permanent dentition. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 331-334.
  • Gursoy T, Kazak M, Gokce K, Benderli Y. Microleakage of class I and V resin composite restorations after bur or Er, Cr:YSGG laser preparation. J Oral Laser Appl 2003; 3: 229-223.
  • Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki Y, Matsumoto K. A Study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 2003; 18: 25-31.
  • Khan MF, Yonaga K, Kimura Y, Funato A, Matsumoto K. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser using three types of restorative materials. Clin Laser Med Surg 1988; 16: 305-308.
  • Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo CP. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er: YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 37: 172-177.
  • Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 340-346.
  • Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er: YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 491-497.
  • Kawahara H, Yamagami A. In vitro studies of cellular responses to heat and vibration in cavity preparation. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 829-835.
  • Takamori K, Frukawa H, Morikawa Y, Katayama T, Watanabe S Basic study on vibrations during tooth preparations caused by high-speed drilling and Er: YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 32: 25-31.
  • Matson JR, Matson E, Navarro RS, Bocangel JS, Jaeger RG, Eduardo CP. Er: YAG laser effects on enamel occlusal fissures: an in vitro study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002; 20: 27-35.
  • Klinke T, Klimm W, Gutknecht N. Antibacterial effects of Nd: YAG laser irradiation within root canal dentin. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997; 15: 29-31.
  • Schoop U, Kluger W, Moritz A, Nedjelik N, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W. Bactericidal effect of different laser systems in the deep layers of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35: 111-116.
  • Bertrand MF, Hessleyer D, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface after Er: YAG laser preparation. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35: 51-57.
  • Delme KI, Deman PJ, Nammour S, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er: YAG laser preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 2006; 24: 715-722.
  • De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium: YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 322-329.
  • Lin S, Caputo AA, Eversole LR, Rizoiu I. Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 451-455.
  • Ekworapoj P, Sidhu SK, Mc Cabe JF. Effect of different power parameters of Er, Cr: YSGG laser on human dentine. Lasers Med Sci 2007; 22: 175-182.
  • Geraldo-Martins VR, Robles FR, Matos AB. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er: YAG laser cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 26-33.
  • Niu W, Eto JN, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K. A study on microleakage after resin filling of Class V cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16: 227-231.
  • Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of the use of Er: YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 430-436.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Ozgul Baygin

Tamer Tuzuner

Fatih Oznurhan

İpek Arslan

Publication Date February 29, 2012
Submission Date February 29, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Baygin O, Tuzuner T, Oznurhan F, Arslan İ (July 1, 2012) Microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations after conventional diamond bur and Er, Cr:YSGG laser preparation. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 15 3 216–228.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.