BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sabit ortodontik tedavi sonrası retansiyon

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 83 - 90, 02.11.2011

Zeynep Degirmenci Omür Ozsoy

Öz

Retention includes the procedures, which are applied to preserve the outcomes of orthodontic treatment and is an inseparable part of the treatment. Relapse, which is seen at postretention period, is affected by several factors including growth pattern, type of original malocclusion and type of treatment. This review implies the factors affecting relapse and the actual retention procedures, which are applied after fixed orthodontic treatment.

ÖZET

Retansiyon, ortodontik tedavi sonuçlarının korunması amacıyla uygulanan prosedürleri kapsar ve tedavinin ayrılmaz bir parçasıdır. Retansiyon sonrası dönemde görülen relaps büyüme paterni, orijinal malokluzyonun tipi, tedavi şekli gibi pek çok faktörden etkilenir. Bu derlemede relapsı etkileyen belli faktörler ve sabit ortodontik tedavi sonrasında uygulanan güncel retansiyon prosedürleri detaylı bir biçimde incelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Retansiyon, relaps, retansiyon apareyleri, ortodontik tedavi, sabit retainerlar

Anahtar Kelimeler

Retention; relapse; retention appliances; orthodontic treatment; fixed retainers

Kaynakça

  • Joondeph DR. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby;2005.p. 1123-51.
  • Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics.3rded. St Louis: CV Mosby;2000. p.597-614.
  • Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967;53:721-45.
  • Thilander B. Biological basis for orthodontic relapse. Semin Orthod. 2000;6(3):195-205.
  • Hummerfelt A, Slagsvold O. changes in occlusion and craniofacial pattern between 11 and 25 years of age. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. ;113-22. Akgül AA, Toygar TU. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;122(5):512-22
  • Carter GA, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114(1):88-99.
  • Richardson ME. A review of changes in lower arch alignment from seven to fifty years. Semin Orthod. 1999;5(3):151-9.
  • Richardson ME. Late lower arch crowding: Facial growth or forward drift? Eur J Orthod 1979;1:219-25.
  • Barrow DB, White JR. Developmental changes of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Angle Orthod 1952;22:41-6.
  • Bergström K, Jensen R. The significance of third molars in the aetiology of crowding. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1960;84-96.
  • Schwarze CW. The influence of third molar germectomy- a comparative long-term study. London: Transactions of the Third International Orthodontic Congress, 1975;551-62.
  • Lindquist B, Thilander B. Extraction of third molars in cases of anticipated crowding in the lower arch. Am J Orthod 1982;81:130-9.
  • Broadbent BH. Ontogenic development of occlusion Angle Orthod 1941;11:223-41.
  • Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and stability: A review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;114:229-306.
  • Storey E. Tissue response to the movement of bones. Am J Orthod 1973;64:229
  • Castro CM. Slow maxillary expansion: a clinical study of the skeletal and dental response during and following the application of low magnitude force, master’s thesis, Seattle, 1979, University of Washington.
  • Cotton LA. Slow maxillary expansion: skeletal versus dental response to low magnitude force in Macaca Mulatta, Am J Orthod ;73:1. Hicks EP. Slow maxillary expansion: a clinical study of the skeletal versus dental response to low magnitude force. Am J Orthod ;36:445. Little RM, Wallen T, Riedel R. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981:80;349-65.
  • Kinne JH. Untreated first premolar extraction: long term observations. [MSD thesis]. Seattle: university of Washington;1975.
  • Persson M, Persson EC, Skagius S. long-term spontaneous changes following removal of all first premolars in Class I cases with crowding. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:271-82.
  • Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics, Vol II. St. Louis: CV Mosby;1966.
  • Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst D. Serial extraction of first premolars: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1991;61:133-44.
  • Shields TR, Little RM, Chapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: a cephalometric appraisal of first- premolar-extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985;87:27-38.
  • McReynolds D, Little RM. Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1991;61(2):133-44.
  • Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction-- postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. ;62(2):103-16. Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97(5):393-404.
  • Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;106(3):243-9.
  • Moussa R, O'Reilly MT, Close JM. Long-term stability of rapid palatal expander treatment and edgewise mechanotherapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108(5):478-88.
  • Elms TN, Buschang PH, Alexander RG. Long-term stability of Class II, Division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: II. Cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;109(4):386-92. Azizi M, Shrout MK, Haas AJ, Russell CM, Hamilton EH Jr. A retrospective study of Angle Class I malocclusions treated orthodontically without extractions using two palatal expansion methods. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;116(1):101-7.
  • Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(1):1-14.
  • Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar- extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients.Angle Orthod. ;63(4):257-72. Kahl-Nieke B, Fishbach H, Schwarze CW. Post-retention crowding and incisor irregularity: a long-term follow-up evaluation of stability and relapse. Br J Orthod 1995;22:249-57.
  • Artun J, Garol JD, Little RM. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(3):229-38.
  • Rossouw PE, Preston CB, Lombard C. A longitudinal evaluation of extraction versus nonextraction treatment with special reference to the posttreatment irregularity of the lower incisors. Semin Orthod. ;5(3):160-70. Shah AA. Postretention changes in mandibular crowding: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;124(3):298-308. Hawley CA. A removable retainer. Dent Cosmos 1919;61:449.
  • Sauget E, Covell DA Jr, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):223-30.
  • Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(6):730-7.
  • Ba çiftçi FA, Uysal T, Sari Z, Inan O. Occlusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):357-62
  • Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report.Am J Orthod. 1965;51(12):901-12.
  • Atack N, Harradine N, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Which way forward? Fixed or removable lower retainers. Angle Orthod. ;77(6):954-9. Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct- bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod.1991;25(10):619-30.
  • Artun J, Urbye KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93(2):143-8.
  • Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977;71(4):440-8.
  • Artun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers. Am J Orthod ; 86:112-8. Zachrisson BJ. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29(1):39-48.
  • Artun J, Zachrisson B. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. Am J Orthod. 1982;81(4):269-76.
  • Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(1):70-6.
  • Pandis N, Vlahopoulos K, Madianos P, Eliades T. Long-term periodontal status of patients with mandibular lingual fixed retention. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(5):471-6.
  • Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108(2):207-13.
  • Boese CFA. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect. Part I Angle Orthod 1980a;50:88-97.
  • Zachrisson BU, Nyİygaard L, Mobarak K. Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;131(2):162-9. Edwards JG. A surgical procedure to eliminate rotational relapse. Am J Orthod. 1970;57(1):35-46.
  • Pinson RR, Strahan JD. The effect on the relapse of orthodontically rotated teeth of surgical division of the gingival fibres--pericision. Br J Orthod. 1974;1(3):87-91.
  • Edwards JG. A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93(5):380-7. Yaz&'ma Adresi: Dt. Zeynep DE[.RMENC.
  • Ba kent Üniversitesi Di Hekimli i Fakültesi Ortodonti AD Bahçelievler Ankara Tel : 0 312 2151336 Faks : 0 312 2152962
  • E-posta : zeynep.degirmenci@gmail.com

SAB T ORTODONT K TEDAV SONRASI RETANS YON

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 83 - 90, 02.11.2011

Zeynep Degirmenci Omür Ozsoy

Öz

Retansiyon, ortodontik tedavi sonuçlar n n korunmas amac yla uygulanan prosedürleri kapsar ve tedavinin ayr lmaz bir parças d r. Retansiyon sonras dönemde görülen relaps büyüme paterni, orijinal malokluzyonun tipi, tedavi ekli gibi pek çok faktörden etkilenir. Bu derlemede relaps etkileyen belli faktörler ve sabit ortodontik tedavi sonras nda uygulanan güncel retansiyon prosedürleri detayl bir biçimde incelenecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Retansiyon relaps retansiyon apareyleri ortodontik tedavi sabit retainerlar

Kaynakça

  • Joondeph DR. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby;2005.p. 1123-51.
  • Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics.3rded. St Louis: CV Mosby;2000. p.597-614.
  • Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967;53:721-45.
  • Thilander B. Biological basis for orthodontic relapse. Semin Orthod. 2000;6(3):195-205.
  • Hummerfelt A, Slagsvold O. changes in occlusion and craniofacial pattern between 11 and 25 years of age. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. ;113-22. Akgül AA, Toygar TU. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;122(5):512-22
  • Carter GA, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114(1):88-99.
  • Richardson ME. A review of changes in lower arch alignment from seven to fifty years. Semin Orthod. 1999;5(3):151-9.
  • Richardson ME. Late lower arch crowding: Facial growth or forward drift? Eur J Orthod 1979;1:219-25.
  • Barrow DB, White JR. Developmental changes of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Angle Orthod 1952;22:41-6.
  • Bergström K, Jensen R. The significance of third molars in the aetiology of crowding. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1960;84-96.
  • Schwarze CW. The influence of third molar germectomy- a comparative long-term study. London: Transactions of the Third International Orthodontic Congress, 1975;551-62.
  • Lindquist B, Thilander B. Extraction of third molars in cases of anticipated crowding in the lower arch. Am J Orthod 1982;81:130-9.
  • Broadbent BH. Ontogenic development of occlusion Angle Orthod 1941;11:223-41.
  • Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and stability: A review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;114:229-306.
  • Storey E. Tissue response to the movement of bones. Am J Orthod 1973;64:229
  • Castro CM. Slow maxillary expansion: a clinical study of the skeletal and dental response during and following the application of low magnitude force, master’s thesis, Seattle, 1979, University of Washington.
  • Cotton LA. Slow maxillary expansion: skeletal versus dental response to low magnitude force in Macaca Mulatta, Am J Orthod ;73:1. Hicks EP. Slow maxillary expansion: a clinical study of the skeletal versus dental response to low magnitude force. Am J Orthod ;36:445. Little RM, Wallen T, Riedel R. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981:80;349-65.
  • Kinne JH. Untreated first premolar extraction: long term observations. [MSD thesis]. Seattle: university of Washington;1975.
  • Persson M, Persson EC, Skagius S. long-term spontaneous changes following removal of all first premolars in Class I cases with crowding. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:271-82.
  • Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics, Vol II. St. Louis: CV Mosby;1966.
  • Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst D. Serial extraction of first premolars: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1991;61:133-44.
  • Shields TR, Little RM, Chapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: a cephalometric appraisal of first- premolar-extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985;87:27-38.
  • McReynolds D, Little RM. Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1991;61(2):133-44.
  • Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction-- postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. ;62(2):103-16. Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97(5):393-404.
  • Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;106(3):243-9.
  • Moussa R, O'Reilly MT, Close JM. Long-term stability of rapid palatal expander treatment and edgewise mechanotherapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108(5):478-88.
  • Elms TN, Buschang PH, Alexander RG. Long-term stability of Class II, Division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: II. Cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;109(4):386-92. Azizi M, Shrout MK, Haas AJ, Russell CM, Hamilton EH Jr. A retrospective study of Angle Class I malocclusions treated orthodontically without extractions using two palatal expansion methods. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;116(1):101-7.
  • Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(1):1-14.
  • Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar- extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients.Angle Orthod. ;63(4):257-72. Kahl-Nieke B, Fishbach H, Schwarze CW. Post-retention crowding and incisor irregularity: a long-term follow-up evaluation of stability and relapse. Br J Orthod 1995;22:249-57.
  • Artun J, Garol JD, Little RM. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(3):229-38.
  • Rossouw PE, Preston CB, Lombard C. A longitudinal evaluation of extraction versus nonextraction treatment with special reference to the posttreatment irregularity of the lower incisors. Semin Orthod. ;5(3):160-70. Shah AA. Postretention changes in mandibular crowding: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;124(3):298-308. Hawley CA. A removable retainer. Dent Cosmos 1919;61:449.
  • Sauget E, Covell DA Jr, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):223-30.
  • Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(6):730-7.
  • Ba çiftçi FA, Uysal T, Sari Z, Inan O. Occlusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):357-62
  • Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report.Am J Orthod. 1965;51(12):901-12.
  • Atack N, Harradine N, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Which way forward? Fixed or removable lower retainers. Angle Orthod. ;77(6):954-9. Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct- bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod.1991;25(10):619-30.
  • Artun J, Urbye KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93(2):143-8.
  • Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977;71(4):440-8.
  • Artun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers. Am J Orthod ; 86:112-8. Zachrisson BJ. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29(1):39-48.
  • Artun J, Zachrisson B. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. Am J Orthod. 1982;81(4):269-76.
  • Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(1):70-6.
  • Pandis N, Vlahopoulos K, Madianos P, Eliades T. Long-term periodontal status of patients with mandibular lingual fixed retention. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(5):471-6.
  • Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108(2):207-13.
  • Boese CFA. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect. Part I Angle Orthod 1980a;50:88-97.
  • Zachrisson BU, Nyİygaard L, Mobarak K. Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. ;131(2):162-9. Edwards JG. A surgical procedure to eliminate rotational relapse. Am J Orthod. 1970;57(1):35-46.
  • Pinson RR, Strahan JD. The effect on the relapse of orthodontically rotated teeth of surgical division of the gingival fibres--pericision. Br J Orthod. 1974;1(3):87-91.
  • Edwards JG. A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93(5):380-7. Yaz&'ma Adresi: Dt. Zeynep DE[.RMENC.
  • Ba kent Üniversitesi Di Hekimli i Fakültesi Ortodonti AD Bahçelievler Ankara Tel : 0 312 2151336 Faks : 0 312 2152962
  • E-posta : zeynep.degirmenci@gmail.com
Toplam 49 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Review
Yazarlar

Zeynep Degirmenci

Omür Ozsoy

Yayımlanma Tarihi 2 Kasım 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Kasım 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Degirmenci Z, Ozsoy O (01 Kasım 2011) Sabit ortodontik tedavi sonrası retansiyon. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 12 1 83–90.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.