Öz
Amaç: Günümüzde kısa dental implantlar, atrofik çenelerde veya anatomik yapıların implant tedavisini sınırladığı olgularda, komplike cerrahi tedavileri uygulamadan, implant yerleştirilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, kliniğimizde uygulanan kısa dental implantların klinik ve radyografik bulgularını, dental implant türü, protez türü ve takip süresi ile ilişkilendirerek sunmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 23 hastaya uygulanan toplam 32 adet kısa dental implant çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Klinik takip implant çevresinden periodontal değerlendirmeler ile radyografik takip ise panoramik radyograflar ile yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmamızın sonuçları marjinal kemik kaybı değerleri ile periodontal parametreler arasında herhangi bir ilişki olmadığını ortaya koymuştur (P> 0.05). Ayrıca implant ve protez türünün kısa dental implantların etrafındaki marjinal kemik kaybı ile ilişkilendirilemediği tespit edilmiştir (P> 0.05). Son olarak, takip süreleri ve marjinal kemik kaybı arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (P< 0.05).
Sonuç: Çalışmamız kısa dental implantların atrofik çenelerde başarı ile kullanılabilecek bir tedavi yöntemi olduğunu göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kısa dental implant marjinal kemik kaybı implant destekli protez.
Kaynakça
- De Boever AL, Quirynen M, Coucke W, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and nonsusceptible patients: a prospective long term study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1341-1350.
- Lee DZ, Chen ST, Darby IB. Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; article in press.
- Wallace SS, Forum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343.
- Bormann KH, Suarez-Conqueiro MM, Von See C, Tavassol F, Dissmann JP, Ruecker M, Kokemueller H, Gelirich NC. Forty sandwich osteotomies in atrophic mandibles: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1562-1570.
- Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of length and diameter on survival rates. Clinical Oral Implant Research 2006;17:35–51.
- Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:257–266.
- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009;7:CD003607.
- Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: A multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1340.
- Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86–93.
- Kotsovilis, S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia CA. Systematic review and metaanalysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough surface dental implants. J Periodontol 2009;80:1700–1718.
- Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in fuction. A retrospective study. J Periodontol 2004:75:327-32.
- Randow K, Ercisson I, Nilner K, Petersson A. Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of branemark dental implants An 18 month clinical followup stuy. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:8-15.
- Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bilhan HA. Radiographic evaluation of narrow diameter implants after 5 years of clinical function:retrospective study. J Oral Implantol 2011;article in press.
- Turkyilmaz I. One year clinical outcome of dental implants placed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A case series. Implant Dent 2010;19:323-329.
- Strietzel PF, Karmon B, Lorean A, Fischer PP. Implant prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible with immediately loaded implants: preliminary data from a retrospective study, considering time of implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:139-157.
- Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. Short implants in posterior jaws. A prospective 1-year study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:47-53.
- Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J: Peri-implant tissues at sub-merged and non-submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:600-607.
- Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, von Konow L, Lothigius E. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:225-234.
- Quirynen M, De Soete M, Van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin. Oral Impl Res 2002;13:1-19.
- Cohen RE. Position paper: Periodontal maintanence. J Periodontol 2003;74:1395-1401.
- Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-552.
- Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15 year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investing 2000;4:13-20.
Öz
Amaç: Günümüzde kısa dental implantlar, atrofik çenelerde veya anatomik yapıların implant tedavisini sınırladığı olgularda, komplike cerrahi tedavileri uygulamadan, implant yerleştirilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, kliniğimizde uygulanan kısa dental implantların klinik ve radyografik bulgularını, dental implant türü, protez türü ve takip süresi ile ilişkilendirerek sunmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 23 hastaya uygulanan toplam 32 adet kısa dental implant çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Klinik takip implant çevresinden periodontal değerlendirmeler ile radyografik takip ise panoramik radyograflar ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmamızın sonuçları marjinal kemik kaybı değerleri ile periodontal parametreler arasında herhangi bir ilişki olmadığını ortaya koymuştur (p>0,05). Ayrıca implant ve protez türünün kısa dental implantların etrafındaki marjinal kemik kaybı ile ilişkilendirilemediği tespit edilmiştir (p>0,05). Son olarak, takip süreleri ve marjinal kemik kaybı arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kısa dental implant marjinal kemik kaybı implant destekli protez
Kaynakça
- De Boever AL, Quirynen M, Coucke W, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and nonsusceptible patients: a prospective long term study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1341-1350.
- Lee DZ, Chen ST, Darby IB. Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; article in press.
- Wallace SS, Forum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343.
- Bormann KH, Suarez-Conqueiro MM, Von See C, Tavassol F, Dissmann JP, Ruecker M, Kokemueller H, Gelirich NC. Forty sandwich osteotomies in atrophic mandibles: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1562-1570.
- Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of length and diameter on survival rates. Clinical Oral Implant Research 2006;17:35–51.
- Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:257–266.
- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009;7:CD003607.
- Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: A multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1340.
- Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86–93.
- Kotsovilis, S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia CA. Systematic review and metaanalysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough surface dental implants. J Periodontol 2009;80:1700–1718.
- Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in fuction. A retrospective study. J Periodontol 2004:75:327-32.
- Randow K, Ercisson I, Nilner K, Petersson A. Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of branemark dental implants An 18 month clinical followup stuy. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:8-15.
- Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bilhan HA. Radiographic evaluation of narrow diameter implants after 5 years of clinical function:retrospective study. J Oral Implantol 2011;article in press.
- Turkyilmaz I. One year clinical outcome of dental implants placed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A case series. Implant Dent 2010;19:323-329.
- Strietzel PF, Karmon B, Lorean A, Fischer PP. Implant prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible with immediately loaded implants: preliminary data from a retrospective study, considering time of implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:139-157.
- Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. Short implants in posterior jaws. A prospective 1-year study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:47-53.
- Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J: Peri-implant tissues at sub-merged and non-submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:600-607.
- Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, von Konow L, Lothigius E. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:225-234.
- Quirynen M, De Soete M, Van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin. Oral Impl Res 2002;13:1-19.
- Cohen RE. Position paper: Periodontal maintanence. J Periodontol 2003;74:1395-1401.
- Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-552.
- Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15 year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investing 2000;4:13-20.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | tur |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 17 Ağustos 2011 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 17 Ağustos 2011 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2011Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.