Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluation of Carabelli’s trait in a group of Turkish patients

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 224 - 229, 17.10.2018

Mağrur Kazak

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.414992
Cited By: 1

Öz

Objectives: Dental
morphological characteristics are useful for providing information in phylogenic
and genetic studies and also for understanding variations within and among
species. Carabelli cusp is expressed in several degrees and in different
frequencies among humans; thus, it is helpful in comparing and characterizing
populations. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate
Carabelli’s trait (CT) in a group of Turkish patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 213
patients between age of 14-65 (mean age 29.99 ± 10.04) were analyzed
retrospectively according to presence or absence of CT on permanent maxillary
first and second molars. All data were statistically analyzed using the IBM
SPSS version 22 program (IBM SPSS, Turkey) and the chi-squared test; p < 0.05 was considered as
statistically significant. Results: Prevalence of CT was found to be 47.9% in the
selected Turkish group. Incidence of CT in any of the teeth on #16/26 was 46.9%
and 4.2% on #17/27. Incidence was detected more on #26 (43.2%) than on #16
(40.4%). Bilateral presence of CT on #16/26 was detected in 78%. CT was seen in
50.7% of females and in 42.9% of males. There was no statistically significant
difference between genders (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Expression of CT can be placed in moderate prevalence group. There was no
sexual dimorphism in its occurrence in the studied group.  CT can be a valuable criterion to determine differences
among various populations and a significant insight into the migratory patterns
in a selected geographical area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carabelli’s trait non-metric trait dental morphological feature sexual dimorphism maxillary molars

Kaynakça

  • Reference1 Subedi N, Sah S, Chataut Tej P, Paudel S, Pradhan A. The prevalence of the Carabelli Trait in selected Nepalese Population. BJMMR 2015; 7(4): 285-291. Reference2 Kraus Bertam S. Carabelli’s anomaly of the maxillary molar teeth; Observations on Mexicans and Papago Indians and an Interpretation of the Inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1951 Dec; 3(4): 348-355.Reference3 Alvesalo L, Nuutila M, Portin P. The cusp of Carabelli. Occurrence in first upper molars and evaluation of its heritability. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33: 191-197.Reference4 Syed S, Stephan AO, Abdelbagi M, Prevez AR, Mohammed AW, Zakirulla M. The prevalence of fifth cusp (Cusp of Carabelli) in the upper molars in Saudi Arabian school students. Int J Morphol 2012; 30: 757-760.Reference5 Vodanovic M, Zukanovic A, Galic I, Harvey L, Savic Pavicin I, Dumanci J, Bedic Z, Njemirovskij V, Slaus M, Brkic, H. Carabelli’s trait in Croatian populations over 1800 years. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 2013; 64: 273-285.Reference6 Biggerstaff RH. Heritability of the Carabelli cusp in twins. J Dent Res 1973 Jan 1; 52(1): 40-44.Reference7 Scott GR, Turner CG. The antrophology of modern human teeth in dental morphology and its variation in recent human populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, p.382.Reference8 Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Aust Dent J 2014; 59: 131-142.Reference9 Falomo OO. The cusp of Carabelli: frequency, distribution, size and clinical significance in Nigeria. WAJM 2002; 21: 322-324.Reference10 Ramin M. Prevalence of the carabelli trait in Iranian adolescents. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013; 4: 12-15.Reference11 Lee GTR, Goose DH. The inheritance of dental traits in a Chinese populations in the United Kingdom. JMG 1972; 9: 336-339.Reference12 Shaweesh AI. Expression of Carabelli’s trait in the Jordanian populations. J Stomat Occ Med 2012; 5: 77-82.Reference13 Mavrodisz K, Rozsa N, Budai M, Soos A, Pap I, Tarjan I. Prevalence of accessory tooth cusps in a contemporaray and ancestral Hungarian population. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 166-169.Reference14 Bermudez De Castro JM. The Carabelli trait in human prehistoric populations of Canary Islands. Hum Biol 1989; 61(1): 117-131. Reference15 Edgar HJH. Microevaluation of African American dental morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2007; 132: 535-544. Reference16 Johnson CL. Hominid Evolution, Dental Anthropology, and Human Variation, Copyright on text and original drawings, UIC Oral Sciences Osci 590, University of Ilinois Chicago, 1999. Reference17 Pederson PO. The east Greenland Eskimo dentition. Copenhagen, Blanco Lunos Bogtrykkeri 1949; 95-99.Reference18 Carbonell VM. The tubercle of Carabelli in the Kish dentition, Mesopotamia, 3000 B.C. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 124-128. Reference19 Oshima S. Dental anomalies of the Chinese. J Orient Med 1949; 26: 1149-1150.Reference20 Immerfall S, Therborn G. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century. Springer 2009, p.417.Reference21 Hanihara T, Ishida H. Os incae: variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 2001; 198: 137-152.Reference22 Hanihara T. Morphological variation of major human populations based on nonmetric dental traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 2008; 136: 169-182.Reference23 Kaviani R, Mackinejad SA, Rakhshan V, Falsafi M. Evaluating prevalence of talon and carabelli’s cusps in tooth examination of patients referred to dental school of Islamic Azad University of Tehran: A 2-year study. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2014, 9(6): 551-557.Reference24 Fox Leonard SC. Comparative health from paleopathological analysis of the human skeletal remains dating the Hellenistic and Roman periods, from Paphos, Cyprus and Corinth, Greece, 1961.Reference25 Angel JL. Appendix 5: Human Skeletons. In Keos: Volume 1 Kephala, a late neolithic settlement and cemetery. In: Coleman, JE, editor. American School of Classical Studies, Princeton 1977, p.133-156.Reference26 Peretz B, Smith P. Dental morphology and pathology of middle bronze age populations in Israel: Sasa and Jebel Qa‘aqir. Atiqot 2004; 46: 45-49.Reference27 Hunter JP, Guatelli-Steinberg D, Weston TC, Durner R, Betsinger TK. Model of tooth morphogenesis predicts carabelli cusp expression, size, and symmetry in humans. PLoS ONE 2010 July; 5(7): e11844.Reference28 Kamatham R, Nuvvula S. Expression of Carabelli trait in children from Southern India - A cross sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6: 51-57.Reference29 Shethri SA. The prevalence of the Carabelli cusp in selected Saudi population. KSUJDS 2011; 2: 13-16.Reference30 Keiser JA. An analysis of the carabelli trait in the mixed deciduous and permanent human dentition. Arc Oral Biol 1984; 29: 403-406.Reference31 Agnihotri G, Singla S, Singla R. Prevalence, expression, and dichotomous nature of Carabelli’s trait in permanent dentition of contemporary Jat Sikhs. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013 July-Sep; 4(3): 97-100.Reference32 Hsu J, Tsai P, Hsiao T, Chang H, Lin L, Liu K, Yu H, Ferguson D. The effect of shovel trait on Carabelli’s Trait in Taiwan Chinese and Aboriginal Populations. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(5): 802-806. Reference33 Khraisat A, Taha ST, Jung RE, Hattar S, Smadi L, Al-Omari IK, Jarbawi M. Prevalence, association, and sexual dimorphism of Carabelli's molar and shovel incisor traits amongst Jordanian population. Odontostomatol Trop 2007; 30: 17-21.Reference34 Synder RG, Dahlberg AA, Snow CC, Dahlberg T. Trait analysis of the dentition of the Tarahumarar Indians and Mestizos of the Sierra made occidental Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969; 31: 65-76.
  • Reference1 Subedi N, Sah S, Chataut Tej P, Paudel S, Pradhan A. The prevalence of the Carabelli Trait in selected Nepalese Population. BJMMR 2015; 7(4): 285-291.
  • Reference2 Kraus Bertam S. Carabelli’s anomaly of the maxillary molar teeth; Observations on Mexicans and Papago Indians and an Interpretation of the Inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1951 Dec; 3(4): 348-355.
  • Reference3 Alvesalo L, Nuutila M, Portin P. The cusp of Carabelli. Occurrence in first upper molars and evaluation of its heritability. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33: 191-197.
  • Reference4 Syed S, Stephan AO, Abdelbagi M, Prevez AR, Mohammed AW, Zakirulla M. The prevalence of fifth cusp (Cusp of Carabelli) in the upper molars in Saudi Arabian school students. Int J Morphol 2012; 30: 757-760
  • Reference5 Vodanovic M, Zukanovic A, Galic I, Harvey L, Savic Pavicin I, Dumancic J, Bedic Z, Njemirovskij V, Slaus M, Brkic, H. Carabelli’s trait in Croatian populations over 1800 years. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 2013; 64: 273-285.
  • Reference6 Biggerstaff RH. Heritability of the Carabelli cusp in twins. J Dent Res 1973 Jan 1; 52(1): 40-44.
  • Reference7 Scott GR, Turner CG. The anthrophology of modern human teeth in dental morphology and its variation in recent human populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, p.382.
  • Reference8 Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Aust Dent J 2014; 59: 131-142.
  • Reference9 Falomo OO. The cusp of Carabelli: frequency, distribution, size and clinical significance in Nigeria. WAJM 2002; 21: 322-324.
  • Reference10 Ramin M. Prevalence of the carabelli trait in Iranian adolescents. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013; 4: 12-15.
  • Reference11 Lee GTR, Goose DH. The inheritance of dental traits in a Chinese populations in the United Kingdom. JMG 1972; 9: 336-339.
  • Reference12 Shaweesh AI. Expression of Carabelli’s trait in the Jordanian populations. J Stomat Occ Med 2012; 5: 77-82.
  • Reference13 Mavrodisz K, Rozsa N, Budai M, Soos A, Pap I, Tarjan I. Prevalence of accessory tooth cusps in a contemporaray and ancestral Hungarian population. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 166-169.
  • Reference14 Bermudez De Castro JM. The Carabelli trait in human prehistoric populations of Canary Islands. Hum Biol 1989; 61(1): 117-131.
  • Reference15 Edgar HJH. Microevaluation of African American dental morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2007; 132: 535-544.
  • Reference16 Johnson CL. Hominid Evolution, Dental Anthropology, and Human Variation, Copyright on text and original drawings, UIC Oral Sciences Osci 590, University of Illinois Chicago, 1999.
  • Reference17 Goldstein MS. The east Greenland Eskimo dentition. Copenhagen, Blanco Lunos Bogtrykkeri 1949; 95-99.
  • Reference18 Carbonell VM. The tubercle of Carabelli in the Kish Dentition, Mesopotamia, 3000 B.C. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 124-128.
  • Reference19 Oshima S. Dental anomalies of the Chinese. J Orient Med 1949; 26: 1149-1150.
  • Reference20 Immerfall S, Therborn G. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century. In: Fahey Tony. Editor. Springer 2009, p.417.
  • Reference21 Hanihara T, Ishida H. Os incae: variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 2001; 198: 137-152.
  • Reference22 Hanihara T. Morphological variation of major human populations based on nonmetric dental traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 2008; 136: 169-182.
  • Reference23 Kaviani R, Mackinejad SA, Rakhshan V, Falsafi M. Evaluating prevalence of talon and carabelli’s cusps in tooth examination of patients referred to dental school of Islamic Azad University of Tehran: A 2-year study. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2014, 9(6): 551-557.
  • Reference24 Fox Leonard SC. Comparative health from paleopathological analysis of the human skeletal remains dating the Hellenistic and Roman periods, from Paphos, Cyprus and Corinth, Greece, 1961.
  • Reference25 Angel JL. Appendix 5: Human Skeletons. In Keos: Volume 1 Kephala, a late neolithic settlement and cemetery. In: Coleman, JE, editor. American School of Classical Studies, Princeton 1997, p.133-156.
  • Reference26 Peretz B, Smith P. Dental morphology and pathology of middle bronze age populations in Israel: Sasa and Jebel Qa‘aqir. Atiqot 2004; 46: 45-49.
  • Reference27 Hunter JP, Guatelli-Steinberg D, Weston TC, Durner R, Betsinger TK. Model of tooth morphogenesis predicts carabelli cusp expression, size, and symmetry in humans. PLoS ONE 2010 July; 5(7): e11844.
  • Reference28 Kamatham R, Nuvvula S. Expression of Carabelli trait in children from Southern India - A cross sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6: 51-57.
  • Reference29 Shethri SA. The prevalence of the Carabelli cusp in selected Saudi population. KSUJDS 2011; 2: 13-16.
  • Reference30 Keiser JA. An analysis of the carabelli trait in the mixed deciduous and permanent human dentition. Arc Oral Biol 1984; 29: 403-406.
  • Reference31 Agnihotri G, Singla S, Singla R. Prevalence, expression, and dichotomous nature of Carabelli’s trait in permanent dentition of contemporary Jat Sikhs. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013 July-Sep; 4(3): 97-100
  • Reference32 Hsu J, Tsai P, Hsiao T, Chang H, Lin L, Liu K, Yu H, Ferguson D. The effect of shovel trait on Carabelli’s Trait in Taiwan Chinese and Aboriginal Populations. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(5): 802-806.
  • Reference33 Khraisat A, Taha ST, Jung RE, Hattar S, Smadi L, Al-Omari IK, Jarbawi M. Prevalence, association, and sexual dimorphism of Carabelli's molar and shovel incisor traits amongst Jordanian population. Odontostomatol Trop 2007; 30: 17-21.
  • Reference34 Synder RG, Dahlberg AA, Snow CC, Dahlberg T. Trait analysis of the dentition of the Tarahumarar Indians and Mestizos of the Sierra made occidental Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969; 31: 65-76.

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 224 - 229, 17.10.2018

Mağrur Kazak

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.414992
Cited By: 1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Reference1 Subedi N, Sah S, Chataut Tej P, Paudel S, Pradhan A. The prevalence of the Carabelli Trait in selected Nepalese Population. BJMMR 2015; 7(4): 285-291. Reference2 Kraus Bertam S. Carabelli’s anomaly of the maxillary molar teeth; Observations on Mexicans and Papago Indians and an Interpretation of the Inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1951 Dec; 3(4): 348-355.Reference3 Alvesalo L, Nuutila M, Portin P. The cusp of Carabelli. Occurrence in first upper molars and evaluation of its heritability. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33: 191-197.Reference4 Syed S, Stephan AO, Abdelbagi M, Prevez AR, Mohammed AW, Zakirulla M. The prevalence of fifth cusp (Cusp of Carabelli) in the upper molars in Saudi Arabian school students. Int J Morphol 2012; 30: 757-760.Reference5 Vodanovic M, Zukanovic A, Galic I, Harvey L, Savic Pavicin I, Dumanci J, Bedic Z, Njemirovskij V, Slaus M, Brkic, H. Carabelli’s trait in Croatian populations over 1800 years. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 2013; 64: 273-285.Reference6 Biggerstaff RH. Heritability of the Carabelli cusp in twins. J Dent Res 1973 Jan 1; 52(1): 40-44.Reference7 Scott GR, Turner CG. The antrophology of modern human teeth in dental morphology and its variation in recent human populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, p.382.Reference8 Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Aust Dent J 2014; 59: 131-142.Reference9 Falomo OO. The cusp of Carabelli: frequency, distribution, size and clinical significance in Nigeria. WAJM 2002; 21: 322-324.Reference10 Ramin M. Prevalence of the carabelli trait in Iranian adolescents. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013; 4: 12-15.Reference11 Lee GTR, Goose DH. The inheritance of dental traits in a Chinese populations in the United Kingdom. JMG 1972; 9: 336-339.Reference12 Shaweesh AI. Expression of Carabelli’s trait in the Jordanian populations. J Stomat Occ Med 2012; 5: 77-82.Reference13 Mavrodisz K, Rozsa N, Budai M, Soos A, Pap I, Tarjan I. Prevalence of accessory tooth cusps in a contemporaray and ancestral Hungarian population. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 166-169.Reference14 Bermudez De Castro JM. The Carabelli trait in human prehistoric populations of Canary Islands. Hum Biol 1989; 61(1): 117-131. Reference15 Edgar HJH. Microevaluation of African American dental morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2007; 132: 535-544. Reference16 Johnson CL. Hominid Evolution, Dental Anthropology, and Human Variation, Copyright on text and original drawings, UIC Oral Sciences Osci 590, University of Ilinois Chicago, 1999. Reference17 Pederson PO. The east Greenland Eskimo dentition. Copenhagen, Blanco Lunos Bogtrykkeri 1949; 95-99.Reference18 Carbonell VM. The tubercle of Carabelli in the Kish dentition, Mesopotamia, 3000 B.C. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 124-128. Reference19 Oshima S. Dental anomalies of the Chinese. J Orient Med 1949; 26: 1149-1150.Reference20 Immerfall S, Therborn G. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century. Springer 2009, p.417.Reference21 Hanihara T, Ishida H. Os incae: variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 2001; 198: 137-152.Reference22 Hanihara T. Morphological variation of major human populations based on nonmetric dental traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 2008; 136: 169-182.Reference23 Kaviani R, Mackinejad SA, Rakhshan V, Falsafi M. Evaluating prevalence of talon and carabelli’s cusps in tooth examination of patients referred to dental school of Islamic Azad University of Tehran: A 2-year study. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2014, 9(6): 551-557.Reference24 Fox Leonard SC. Comparative health from paleopathological analysis of the human skeletal remains dating the Hellenistic and Roman periods, from Paphos, Cyprus and Corinth, Greece, 1961.Reference25 Angel JL. Appendix 5: Human Skeletons. In Keos: Volume 1 Kephala, a late neolithic settlement and cemetery. In: Coleman, JE, editor. American School of Classical Studies, Princeton 1977, p.133-156.Reference26 Peretz B, Smith P. Dental morphology and pathology of middle bronze age populations in Israel: Sasa and Jebel Qa‘aqir. Atiqot 2004; 46: 45-49.Reference27 Hunter JP, Guatelli-Steinberg D, Weston TC, Durner R, Betsinger TK. Model of tooth morphogenesis predicts carabelli cusp expression, size, and symmetry in humans. PLoS ONE 2010 July; 5(7): e11844.Reference28 Kamatham R, Nuvvula S. Expression of Carabelli trait in children from Southern India - A cross sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6: 51-57.Reference29 Shethri SA. The prevalence of the Carabelli cusp in selected Saudi population. KSUJDS 2011; 2: 13-16.Reference30 Keiser JA. An analysis of the carabelli trait in the mixed deciduous and permanent human dentition. Arc Oral Biol 1984; 29: 403-406.Reference31 Agnihotri G, Singla S, Singla R. Prevalence, expression, and dichotomous nature of Carabelli’s trait in permanent dentition of contemporary Jat Sikhs. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013 July-Sep; 4(3): 97-100.Reference32 Hsu J, Tsai P, Hsiao T, Chang H, Lin L, Liu K, Yu H, Ferguson D. The effect of shovel trait on Carabelli’s Trait in Taiwan Chinese and Aboriginal Populations. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(5): 802-806. Reference33 Khraisat A, Taha ST, Jung RE, Hattar S, Smadi L, Al-Omari IK, Jarbawi M. Prevalence, association, and sexual dimorphism of Carabelli's molar and shovel incisor traits amongst Jordanian population. Odontostomatol Trop 2007; 30: 17-21.Reference34 Synder RG, Dahlberg AA, Snow CC, Dahlberg T. Trait analysis of the dentition of the Tarahumarar Indians and Mestizos of the Sierra made occidental Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969; 31: 65-76.
  • Reference1 Subedi N, Sah S, Chataut Tej P, Paudel S, Pradhan A. The prevalence of the Carabelli Trait in selected Nepalese Population. BJMMR 2015; 7(4): 285-291.
  • Reference2 Kraus Bertam S. Carabelli’s anomaly of the maxillary molar teeth; Observations on Mexicans and Papago Indians and an Interpretation of the Inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1951 Dec; 3(4): 348-355.
  • Reference3 Alvesalo L, Nuutila M, Portin P. The cusp of Carabelli. Occurrence in first upper molars and evaluation of its heritability. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33: 191-197.
  • Reference4 Syed S, Stephan AO, Abdelbagi M, Prevez AR, Mohammed AW, Zakirulla M. The prevalence of fifth cusp (Cusp of Carabelli) in the upper molars in Saudi Arabian school students. Int J Morphol 2012; 30: 757-760
  • Reference5 Vodanovic M, Zukanovic A, Galic I, Harvey L, Savic Pavicin I, Dumancic J, Bedic Z, Njemirovskij V, Slaus M, Brkic, H. Carabelli’s trait in Croatian populations over 1800 years. HOMO - J Comp Hum Biol 2013; 64: 273-285.
  • Reference6 Biggerstaff RH. Heritability of the Carabelli cusp in twins. J Dent Res 1973 Jan 1; 52(1): 40-44.
  • Reference7 Scott GR, Turner CG. The anthrophology of modern human teeth in dental morphology and its variation in recent human populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, p.382.
  • Reference8 Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Aust Dent J 2014; 59: 131-142.
  • Reference9 Falomo OO. The cusp of Carabelli: frequency, distribution, size and clinical significance in Nigeria. WAJM 2002; 21: 322-324.
  • Reference10 Ramin M. Prevalence of the carabelli trait in Iranian adolescents. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013; 4: 12-15.
  • Reference11 Lee GTR, Goose DH. The inheritance of dental traits in a Chinese populations in the United Kingdom. JMG 1972; 9: 336-339.
  • Reference12 Shaweesh AI. Expression of Carabelli’s trait in the Jordanian populations. J Stomat Occ Med 2012; 5: 77-82.
  • Reference13 Mavrodisz K, Rozsa N, Budai M, Soos A, Pap I, Tarjan I. Prevalence of accessory tooth cusps in a contemporaray and ancestral Hungarian population. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 166-169.
  • Reference14 Bermudez De Castro JM. The Carabelli trait in human prehistoric populations of Canary Islands. Hum Biol 1989; 61(1): 117-131.
  • Reference15 Edgar HJH. Microevaluation of African American dental morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2007; 132: 535-544.
  • Reference16 Johnson CL. Hominid Evolution, Dental Anthropology, and Human Variation, Copyright on text and original drawings, UIC Oral Sciences Osci 590, University of Illinois Chicago, 1999.
  • Reference17 Goldstein MS. The east Greenland Eskimo dentition. Copenhagen, Blanco Lunos Bogtrykkeri 1949; 95-99.
  • Reference18 Carbonell VM. The tubercle of Carabelli in the Kish Dentition, Mesopotamia, 3000 B.C. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 124-128.
  • Reference19 Oshima S. Dental anomalies of the Chinese. J Orient Med 1949; 26: 1149-1150.
  • Reference20 Immerfall S, Therborn G. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century. In: Fahey Tony. Editor. Springer 2009, p.417.
  • Reference21 Hanihara T, Ishida H. Os incae: variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 2001; 198: 137-152.
  • Reference22 Hanihara T. Morphological variation of major human populations based on nonmetric dental traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 2008; 136: 169-182.
  • Reference23 Kaviani R, Mackinejad SA, Rakhshan V, Falsafi M. Evaluating prevalence of talon and carabelli’s cusps in tooth examination of patients referred to dental school of Islamic Azad University of Tehran: A 2-year study. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2014, 9(6): 551-557.
  • Reference24 Fox Leonard SC. Comparative health from paleopathological analysis of the human skeletal remains dating the Hellenistic and Roman periods, from Paphos, Cyprus and Corinth, Greece, 1961.
  • Reference25 Angel JL. Appendix 5: Human Skeletons. In Keos: Volume 1 Kephala, a late neolithic settlement and cemetery. In: Coleman, JE, editor. American School of Classical Studies, Princeton 1997, p.133-156.
  • Reference26 Peretz B, Smith P. Dental morphology and pathology of middle bronze age populations in Israel: Sasa and Jebel Qa‘aqir. Atiqot 2004; 46: 45-49.
  • Reference27 Hunter JP, Guatelli-Steinberg D, Weston TC, Durner R, Betsinger TK. Model of tooth morphogenesis predicts carabelli cusp expression, size, and symmetry in humans. PLoS ONE 2010 July; 5(7): e11844.
  • Reference28 Kamatham R, Nuvvula S. Expression of Carabelli trait in children from Southern India - A cross sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014; 6: 51-57.
  • Reference29 Shethri SA. The prevalence of the Carabelli cusp in selected Saudi population. KSUJDS 2011; 2: 13-16.
  • Reference30 Keiser JA. An analysis of the carabelli trait in the mixed deciduous and permanent human dentition. Arc Oral Biol 1984; 29: 403-406.
  • Reference31 Agnihotri G, Singla S, Singla R. Prevalence, expression, and dichotomous nature of Carabelli’s trait in permanent dentition of contemporary Jat Sikhs. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2013 July-Sep; 4(3): 97-100
  • Reference32 Hsu J, Tsai P, Hsiao T, Chang H, Lin L, Liu K, Yu H, Ferguson D. The effect of shovel trait on Carabelli’s Trait in Taiwan Chinese and Aboriginal Populations. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(5): 802-806.
  • Reference33 Khraisat A, Taha ST, Jung RE, Hattar S, Smadi L, Al-Omari IK, Jarbawi M. Prevalence, association, and sexual dimorphism of Carabelli's molar and shovel incisor traits amongst Jordanian population. Odontostomatol Trop 2007; 30: 17-21.
  • Reference34 Synder RG, Dahlberg AA, Snow CC, Dahlberg T. Trait analysis of the dentition of the Tarahumarar Indians and Mestizos of the Sierra made occidental Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969; 31: 65-76.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Mağrur Kazak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ekim 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Nisan 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Kazak M (01 Ekim 2018) Evaluation of Carabelli’s trait in a group of Turkish patients. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 21 3 224–229.

Cited By

Prevalence of the Cusp of Carabelli – A systematic review and meta-analysis
Annals of Human Biology
https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2022.2032339
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.