Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3, 95 - 102, 04.09.2023

Diler Deniz Güliz Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1152202

Öz

Tam seramik restorasyonlar yıllardır diş hekimleri tarafından güvenle tercih edilen restorasyon çeşitlerindendir. Ancak hastaların seans sayısı ve süresinin kısalması ile birlikte artan estetik beklentisi, diş hekimliğinde dijital teknoloji kullanımının önemini artırmıştır. Güncel klinik uygulamalarda dijital diş hekimliğinin kullanımıyla birlikte, monolitik tam seramik restorasyonlara yönelim her geçen gün hızlanmaktadır. Bu talebe karşılık, üretici firmalar da içeriği ve özellikleri geliştirilmiş yeni materyalleri dental markete sunmaktadır. Özellikle yüksek estetik ve aynı zamanda mekanik dayanıklılığa sahip materyaller geliştirilmeye devam etmektedir. Zirkonya restorasyonlar yıllardır yüksek kırılma dayanım ve biyouyumluluk özellikleri nedeniyle tercih edilse de porselen-zirkonya bağlantısının zayıf olması (potansiyel chipping riski) ve nispeten düşük estetik (translusensi ve ışık geçirgenliği) özellikleri nedeniyle geliştirilmeye en açık restorasyon materyallerindendir. Zirkonyanın bu dezavantajlarını ortadan kaldırmak ve avantajlarından faydalanabilmek amacıyla üreticiler, zirkonyanın içyapısında değişiklikler yaparak monolitik kullanıma uygun hale getirmişlerdir. Ancak güncel kullanımda çok çeşitli monolitik zirkonya blokların bulunması, klinisyenin uygun materyal seçiminde zorluklar oluşturmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı klinisyenlere rehber olacak şekilde güncel monolitik zirkonya materyalinin sınıflandırmasını yapmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dental materyaller diş kronu zirkonya monolitik

Kaynakça

  • 1. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017;48:369-80.
  • 2. Güth JF, Stawarczyk B, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A. Zirconia and its novel compositions: What do clinicians need to know? Quintessence Int 2019;50:512-20.
  • 3. Nassary Zadeh P, Lümkemann N, Sener B, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:948-54.
  • 4. Pfefferle R, Lümkemann N, Wiedenmann F, Stawarczyk B. Different polishing methods for zirconia: impact on surface, optical, and mechanical properties. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:395-403.
  • 5. Botelho MG, Dangay S, Shih K, Lam WYH. The effect of surface treatments on dental zirconia: An analysis of biaxial flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation. J Dent 2018;75:65-73.
  • 6. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Woolman JN, Munir ZA. Transparent Nanometric Cubic and Tetragonal Zirconia Obtained by High-Pressure Pulsed Electric Current Sintering. Adv. Funct Mater 2007;17:3267-73.
  • 7. Malkondu Ö, Tinastepe N, Akan E, Kazazoğlu E. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2016;30:644-52.
  • 8. Klimke J, Trunec M, Krell A. Transparent Tetragonal Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Ceramics: Influence of Scattering Caused by Birefringence. J Am Ceram Soc 2011;94:1850-8.
  • 9. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017;48:441-50.
  • 10. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307.
  • 11. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011;27:83-96.
  • 12. Filser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Luthy H, Scharer P, et al. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent 2001;4:89-106.
  • 13. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  • 14. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Trottmann A, Hämmerle CH, Roos M. Evaluation of flexural strength of hipped and presintered zirconia using different estimation methods of Weibull statistics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;10:227-34.
  • 15. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Hallmann L, Ender A, Mehl A, et al. The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratio. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:269-74.
  • 16. Jerg A, Spitznagel F, Ahlers O, Beck J, Beuer F, et al. Update of the S3 guideline “All-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses”–current evidence-based recommendations. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z Int  2021;3:248-56.
  • 17. Shahmiri R, Standard OC, Hart JN, Sorrell CC. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:36-46.
  • 18. Stawarczyk B, Emslander A, Roos M, Sener B, Noack F, et al. Zirconia ceramics, their contrast ratio and grain size depending on sintering parameters. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:591-8.
  • 19. Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, et al. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;59:128-38.
  • 20. Alammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:117-35.
  • 21. Mao L, Kaizer MR, Zhao M, Guo B, Song YF, Zhang Y. Graded Ultra-Translucent Zirconia (5Y-PSZ) for Strength and Functionalities. J Dent Res 2018;97:1222-8.
  • 22. 3M.com/Dental. 3M™ Lava™ Esthetic Esthetic Fluorescent Full-Contour Zirconia Technical Product Profile. 2018 p. 1-20
  • 23. Kuraray N. KATANA™ Zirconia UTML STML ML HT Technical Guide. 2021.
  • 24. Gseibat M, Sevilla P, Lopez-Suarez C, Rodríguez V, Peláez J, et al. Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Third-Generation Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated with Complete Digital Workflow: Two-Year Follow-Up. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:672.
  • 25. Ueda K, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Kappert H, et al. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J 2015;34:310-4.
  • 26. Kuraray N. KATANA™ Zirconia YML. Discover next evolution multilayered. 2021. p. 1-12.
  • 27. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent 2017;65:51-5.
  • 28. Trier AC, Parker MH, Cameron SM, Brousseau JS. Evaluation of resistance form of dislodged crowns and retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:405-9.
  • 29. Gehrt M, Wolfart S, Rafai N, Reich S, Edelhoff D. Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:275-84.
  • 30. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18 :193-204.
  • 31. Chaar MS, Passia N, Kern M. Ten-year clinical outcome of three-unit posterior FDPs made from a glass-infiltrated zirconia reinforced alumina ceramic (In-Ceram Zirconia). J Dent 2015;43:512-7.
  • 32. Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, et al. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:214-22.
  • 33. Rinke S, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:164-71.
  • 34. Rinke S, Wehle J, Schulz X, Bürgers R, Rödiger M. Prospective Evaluation of Posterior Fixed Zirconia Dental Prostheses: 10-Year Clinical Results. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:35-42.
  • 35. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8.
  • 36. Comino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:2751.
  • 37. Rohr N, Märtin S, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J. A comprehensive in vitro study on the performance of two different strategies to simplify adhesive bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:833-42.
  • 38. Tian F, Londono J, Villalobos V, Pan Y, Ho HX, et al. Effectiveness of different cleaning measures on the bonding of resin cement to saliva-contaminated or blood-contaminated zirconia. J Dent 2022;120:104084.
  • 39. Gan D, Iqbal MN, Xu Q, Shen Z, Ramos V, Jr., et al. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion with a novel spherical abrasive on the zirconia surface.  J Prosthet Dent 2022;S0022-3913:00012-9.
  • 40. Ruales-Carrera E, Cesar PF, Henriques B, Fredel MC, Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Adhesion behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:388-97
  • 41. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Quaas AC, Ludwig K, et al. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:283-90.
  • 42. Feitosa SA, Patel D, Borges AL, Alshehri EZ, Bottino MA, et al. Effect of cleansing methods on saliva-contaminated zirconia- an evaluation of resin bond durability. Oper Dent 2015;40:163-71.
  • 43. Phark JH, Duarte S, Jr, Kahn H, Blatz MB, Sadan A. Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength to modified zirconia. Dent Mater 2009;25:1541-50.
  • 44. Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:259-64.
  • 45. Lümkemann N, Schönhoff LM, Buser R, Stawarczyk B. Effect of Cleaning Protocol on Bond Strength between Resin Composite Cement and Three Different CAD/CAM Materials. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:4150. 
  • 46. Komine F, Kimura F, Kubochi K, Takano R, Nakase D, et al. Influence of roughening procedures and priming agents on shear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2021;40:664-73.
  • 47. Scaminaci Russo D, Cinelli F, Sarti C, Giachetti L. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Current Conditioning Methods and Bonding Materials. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7:74.
  • 48. Szawioła-Kirejczyk M, Chmura K, Gronkiewicz K, Gala A, Loster JE, Ryniewicz W. Adhesive Cementation of Zirconia Based Ceramics-Surface Modification Methods Literature Review. Coatings 2022;12:1067.
  • 49. Aljomard YRM, Altunok EÇ, Kara HB. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:473-89.
  • 50. Jum'ah AA, Brunton PA, Li KC, Waddell JN. Simulated clinical adjustment and intra-oral polishing of two translucent, monolithic zirconia dental ceramics: An in vitro investigation of surface roughness. J Dent 2020;101:103447.
  • 51. Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci 2015;57:255-61.
  • 52. Weigl P, Sander A, Wu Y, Felber R, Lauer HC, Rosentritt M. In-vitro performance and fracture strength of thin monolithic zirconia crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:79-84.
  • 53. Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, Schmitter M. Short-Term Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Single Crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:22-30.
  • 54. Gardell E, Larsson C, von Steyern PV. Translucent Zirconium Dioxide and Lithium Disilicate: A 3-Year Follow-up of a Prospective, Practice-Based Randomized Controlled Trial on Posterior Monolithic Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:163-72.
  • 55. Güth JF, Wallbach J, Stimmelmayr M, Gernet W, Beuer F, et al. Computer-aided evaluation of preparations for CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1389-95.
  • 56. Edelhoff D, Liebermann A, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. Minimally invasive treatment options in fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 2016;47:207-16.
  • 57. Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1165-72.
  • 58.Solá-Ruiz MF, Baixauli-López M, Roig-Vanaclocha A, Amengual-Lorenzo J, Agustín-Panadero R. Prospective study of monolithic zirconia crowns: clinical behavior and survival rate at a 5-year follow-up. J Prosthodont Res 2021;65:284-90.

CURRENT GENERATIONS OF ZIRCONIA: CLINICAL TRICKS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3, 95 - 102, 04.09.2023

Diler Deniz Güliz Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1152202

Öz

Tam seramik restorasyonlar yıllardır diş hekimleri tarafından güvenle tercih edilen restorasyon çeşitlerindendir. Ancak hastaların seans sayısı ve süresinin kısalması ile birlikte artan estetik beklentisi, diş hekimliğinde dijital teknoloji kullanımının önemini artırmıştır. Güncel klinik uygulamalarda dijital diş hekimliğinin kullanımıyla birlikte, monolitik tam seramik restorasyonlara yönelim her geçen gün hızlanmaktadır. Bu talebe karşılık, üretici firmalar da içeriği ve özellikleri geliştirilmiş yeni materyalleri dental markete sunmaktadır. Özellikle yüksek estetik ve aynı zamanda mekanik dayanıklılığa sahip materyaller geliştirilmeye devam etmektedir. Zirkonya restorasyonlar yıllardır yüksek kırılma dayanım ve biyouyumluluk özellikleri nedeniyle tercih edilse de porselen-zirkonya bağlantısının zayıf olması (potansiyel chipping riski) ve nispeten düşük estetik (translusensi ve ışık geçirgenliği) özellikleri nedeniyle geliştirilmeye en açık restorasyon materyallerindendir. Zirkonyanın bu dezavantajlarını ortadan kaldırmak ve avantajlarından faydalanabilmek amacıyla üreticiler, zirkonyanın içyapısında değişiklikler yaparak monolitik kullanıma uygun hale getirmişlerdir. Ancak güncel kullanımda çok çeşitli monolitik zirkonya blokların bulunması, klinisyenin uygun materyal seçiminde zorluklar oluşturmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı klinisyenlere rehber olacak şekilde güncel monolitik zirkonya materyalinin sınıflandırmasını yapmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

zirconium dental materials tooth crown monolitik

Kaynakça

  • 1. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017;48:369-80.
  • 2. Güth JF, Stawarczyk B, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A. Zirconia and its novel compositions: What do clinicians need to know? Quintessence Int 2019;50:512-20.
  • 3. Nassary Zadeh P, Lümkemann N, Sener B, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:948-54.
  • 4. Pfefferle R, Lümkemann N, Wiedenmann F, Stawarczyk B. Different polishing methods for zirconia: impact on surface, optical, and mechanical properties. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:395-403.
  • 5. Botelho MG, Dangay S, Shih K, Lam WYH. The effect of surface treatments on dental zirconia: An analysis of biaxial flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation. J Dent 2018;75:65-73.
  • 6. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Woolman JN, Munir ZA. Transparent Nanometric Cubic and Tetragonal Zirconia Obtained by High-Pressure Pulsed Electric Current Sintering. Adv. Funct Mater 2007;17:3267-73.
  • 7. Malkondu Ö, Tinastepe N, Akan E, Kazazoğlu E. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2016;30:644-52.
  • 8. Klimke J, Trunec M, Krell A. Transparent Tetragonal Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Ceramics: Influence of Scattering Caused by Birefringence. J Am Ceram Soc 2011;94:1850-8.
  • 9. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017;48:441-50.
  • 10. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307.
  • 11. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011;27:83-96.
  • 12. Filser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Luthy H, Scharer P, et al. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent 2001;4:89-106.
  • 13. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  • 14. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Trottmann A, Hämmerle CH, Roos M. Evaluation of flexural strength of hipped and presintered zirconia using different estimation methods of Weibull statistics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;10:227-34.
  • 15. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Hallmann L, Ender A, Mehl A, et al. The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratio. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:269-74.
  • 16. Jerg A, Spitznagel F, Ahlers O, Beck J, Beuer F, et al. Update of the S3 guideline “All-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses”–current evidence-based recommendations. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z Int  2021;3:248-56.
  • 17. Shahmiri R, Standard OC, Hart JN, Sorrell CC. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:36-46.
  • 18. Stawarczyk B, Emslander A, Roos M, Sener B, Noack F, et al. Zirconia ceramics, their contrast ratio and grain size depending on sintering parameters. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:591-8.
  • 19. Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, et al. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;59:128-38.
  • 20. Alammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:117-35.
  • 21. Mao L, Kaizer MR, Zhao M, Guo B, Song YF, Zhang Y. Graded Ultra-Translucent Zirconia (5Y-PSZ) for Strength and Functionalities. J Dent Res 2018;97:1222-8.
  • 22. 3M.com/Dental. 3M™ Lava™ Esthetic Esthetic Fluorescent Full-Contour Zirconia Technical Product Profile. 2018 p. 1-20
  • 23. Kuraray N. KATANA™ Zirconia UTML STML ML HT Technical Guide. 2021.
  • 24. Gseibat M, Sevilla P, Lopez-Suarez C, Rodríguez V, Peláez J, et al. Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Third-Generation Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated with Complete Digital Workflow: Two-Year Follow-Up. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:672.
  • 25. Ueda K, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Kappert H, et al. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J 2015;34:310-4.
  • 26. Kuraray N. KATANA™ Zirconia YML. Discover next evolution multilayered. 2021. p. 1-12.
  • 27. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent 2017;65:51-5.
  • 28. Trier AC, Parker MH, Cameron SM, Brousseau JS. Evaluation of resistance form of dislodged crowns and retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:405-9.
  • 29. Gehrt M, Wolfart S, Rafai N, Reich S, Edelhoff D. Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:275-84.
  • 30. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18 :193-204.
  • 31. Chaar MS, Passia N, Kern M. Ten-year clinical outcome of three-unit posterior FDPs made from a glass-infiltrated zirconia reinforced alumina ceramic (In-Ceram Zirconia). J Dent 2015;43:512-7.
  • 32. Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, et al. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:214-22.
  • 33. Rinke S, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:164-71.
  • 34. Rinke S, Wehle J, Schulz X, Bürgers R, Rödiger M. Prospective Evaluation of Posterior Fixed Zirconia Dental Prostheses: 10-Year Clinical Results. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:35-42.
  • 35. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8.
  • 36. Comino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:2751.
  • 37. Rohr N, Märtin S, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J. A comprehensive in vitro study on the performance of two different strategies to simplify adhesive bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:833-42.
  • 38. Tian F, Londono J, Villalobos V, Pan Y, Ho HX, et al. Effectiveness of different cleaning measures on the bonding of resin cement to saliva-contaminated or blood-contaminated zirconia. J Dent 2022;120:104084.
  • 39. Gan D, Iqbal MN, Xu Q, Shen Z, Ramos V, Jr., et al. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion with a novel spherical abrasive on the zirconia surface.  J Prosthet Dent 2022;S0022-3913:00012-9.
  • 40. Ruales-Carrera E, Cesar PF, Henriques B, Fredel MC, Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Adhesion behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:388-97
  • 41. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Quaas AC, Ludwig K, et al. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:283-90.
  • 42. Feitosa SA, Patel D, Borges AL, Alshehri EZ, Bottino MA, et al. Effect of cleansing methods on saliva-contaminated zirconia- an evaluation of resin bond durability. Oper Dent 2015;40:163-71.
  • 43. Phark JH, Duarte S, Jr, Kahn H, Blatz MB, Sadan A. Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength to modified zirconia. Dent Mater 2009;25:1541-50.
  • 44. Yoshida K. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:259-64.
  • 45. Lümkemann N, Schönhoff LM, Buser R, Stawarczyk B. Effect of Cleaning Protocol on Bond Strength between Resin Composite Cement and Three Different CAD/CAM Materials. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:4150. 
  • 46. Komine F, Kimura F, Kubochi K, Takano R, Nakase D, et al. Influence of roughening procedures and priming agents on shear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2021;40:664-73.
  • 47. Scaminaci Russo D, Cinelli F, Sarti C, Giachetti L. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Current Conditioning Methods and Bonding Materials. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7:74.
  • 48. Szawioła-Kirejczyk M, Chmura K, Gronkiewicz K, Gala A, Loster JE, Ryniewicz W. Adhesive Cementation of Zirconia Based Ceramics-Surface Modification Methods Literature Review. Coatings 2022;12:1067.
  • 49. Aljomard YRM, Altunok EÇ, Kara HB. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:473-89.
  • 50. Jum'ah AA, Brunton PA, Li KC, Waddell JN. Simulated clinical adjustment and intra-oral polishing of two translucent, monolithic zirconia dental ceramics: An in vitro investigation of surface roughness. J Dent 2020;101:103447.
  • 51. Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci 2015;57:255-61.
  • 52. Weigl P, Sander A, Wu Y, Felber R, Lauer HC, Rosentritt M. In-vitro performance and fracture strength of thin monolithic zirconia crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:79-84.
  • 53. Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, Schmitter M. Short-Term Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Single Crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:22-30.
  • 54. Gardell E, Larsson C, von Steyern PV. Translucent Zirconium Dioxide and Lithium Disilicate: A 3-Year Follow-up of a Prospective, Practice-Based Randomized Controlled Trial on Posterior Monolithic Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:163-72.
  • 55. Güth JF, Wallbach J, Stimmelmayr M, Gernet W, Beuer F, et al. Computer-aided evaluation of preparations for CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1389-95.
  • 56. Edelhoff D, Liebermann A, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. Minimally invasive treatment options in fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 2016;47:207-16.
  • 57. Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1165-72.
  • 58.Solá-Ruiz MF, Baixauli-López M, Roig-Vanaclocha A, Amengual-Lorenzo J, Agustín-Panadero R. Prospective study of monolithic zirconia crowns: clinical behavior and survival rate at a 5-year follow-up. J Prosthodont Res 2021;65:284-90.
Toplam 58 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Diler Deniz 0000-0002-4465-8600

Güliz Aktaş 0000-0001-7247-2507

Yayımlanma Tarihi 4 Eylül 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Deniz, D., & Aktaş, G. (2023). ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI. Acta Odontologica Turcica, 40(3), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1152202
AMA Deniz D, Aktaş G. ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI. Acta Odontol Turc. Eylül 2023;40(3):95-102. doi:10.17214/gaziaot.1152202
Chicago Deniz, Diler, ve Güliz Aktaş. “ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 40, sy. 3 (Eylül 2023): 95-102. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1152202.
EndNote Deniz D, Aktaş G (01 Eylül 2023) ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI. Acta Odontologica Turcica 40 3 95–102.
IEEE D. Deniz ve G. Aktaş, “ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI”, Acta Odontol Turc, c. 40, sy. 3, ss. 95–102, 2023, doi: 10.17214/gaziaot.1152202.
ISNAD Deniz, Diler - Aktaş, Güliz. “ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 40/3 (Eylül 2023), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1152202.
JAMA Deniz D, Aktaş G. ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI. Acta Odontol Turc. 2023;40:95–102.
MLA Deniz, Diler ve Güliz Aktaş. “ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI”. Acta Odontologica Turcica, c. 40, sy. 3, 2023, ss. 95-102, doi:10.17214/gaziaot.1152202.
Vancouver Deniz D, Aktaş G. ZİRKONYA GÜNCEL JENERASYONLARI: KLİNİK İPUÇLARI. Acta Odontol Turc. 2023;40(3):95-102.
 Kapak Resmi İndir