Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BİR DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİNDEKİ DENTAL VOLUMETRİK TOMOGRAFİ İSTEK NEDENLERİ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: Supplement, 13 - 18, 25.03.2022

Gediz Geduk Emre Haylaz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1025444

Öz

ÖZ
Amaç: Diş hekimliği fakültelerinde Dental Volumetrik Tomografinin (DVT), hekimler tarafından istenme nedenlerinin incelenmesi, kullanım alanlarının belirlenerek, tekniğin geliştirilmesi açısından fayda sağlayabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, diş hekimliği fakültesine başvuran hastalardaki DVT istek nedenlerinin, bu isteklerin bölüm, yaş ve cinsiyete göre dağılımlarının incelenmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalında çekilmiş, 2016-2019 yılları arasındaki 1571 hastaya ait Dental Volumetrik Tomografi(Veraviewapocs 3D R100 (J. Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japan)) istek formları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, DVT istenme nedenleri ve DVT talep eden bölümler kaydedildi. Elde edilen veriler üzerinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve istek nedenleri ile yaş ve cinsiyet arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmek için ki-kare testi uygulandı. Çalışmada istatistiksel yazılım olarak SPSS 22.0 Paket Veri Programı (SPSS 22.0 Software Package Program, Inc.. Chicago, IL, ABD) kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 1571 hastanın 836’sı kadın, 735’i erkek olarak belirlendi ve sırasıyla yaş ortalamaları 40.44±0,624 ve 39,93±0,683 olarak tespit edildi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların DVT istem nedenlerine bakıldığında ise sırasıyla en çok pre-operatif implant planlamasını değerlendirilmesi(%29,5), lezyon(%20,6) ve mandibulada gömülü üçüncü molar(%11,6) dişleri değerlendirmek amacıyla istemler yapıldığı görülmektedir. Bunların yanı sıra TME, sinüs ve travma değerlendirmeleri gibi toplamda 26 farklı DVT istem nedeni tespit edildi. Tüm hasta grubunda istem nedenlerinin cinsiyet ile ilişkisine baktığımızda ki-kare testine göre anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmiştir (p<0.05).
Sonuç:
Günümüzde DVT’nin diş hekimliğinde kullanılmaya başlanması ile tanı ve teşhis kapasitesi hızla gelişmeye başlamıştır. Üç boyutlu görüntülemeye olanak sağlayan DVT yüksek çözünürlük kapasitesiyle baş boyun bölgesindeki anatomik yapıların değerlendirilmesine olanak sağlar. Dental Volumetrik Tomografinin radyografik açıdan net görüntü vermesi ve elde edilen kesitlerin farklı açıdan incelenebilmesi gibi avantajlarından dolayı diş hekimliğinde kullanımı giderek artmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Volumetrik Tomografi endikasyon implant planlama lezyon

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES 1. Scarfe WC and Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-730.
  • 2. Scarfe WC, Farman AG and Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
  • 3. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, & Andreis IB. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European Radiology 1998:8;1558-1564.
  • 4. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:102-121.
  • 5. Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Australian Dental Journal 2017;62:33-50.
  • 6. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:265-9.
  • 7. Ganz SD. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:515-536.
  • 8. Tarım Ertaş E, Kalabalık F. The indications for dental volumetric tomography in a turkish population sample. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2015;24:232-240.
  • 9. Menziletoğlu D, Işık BK and Güler AY. Reasons of cone-beam computed tomography requests in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2019;15:64-69.
  • 10. Özcan M, Keçeli S, Cenk Mehmet H. The comparison of panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for vertical bone height in maxillary posterior are. Yeditepe Dental Journal 2016;12:39-46.
  • 11. Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol 2011;82:395-402.
  • 12. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 2004;75:631-45.
  • 13. Kaneda T, Minami M, Kurabayashi T. Benign odontogenic tumors of the mandible and maxilla. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003;13:495-507.
  • 14. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J. 2009;207:23-8.
  • 15. Akarslan Z, Peker I. Bir diş hekimliği fakültesindeki konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi incelemesi istenme nedenleri. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2015;32:1-6.
  • 16. Ahmad M, Jenny J, Downie M. Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Aust Dent J 2012;57:82-94
  • 17. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25.
  • 18. Naitoh M, Suenaga Y, Kondo S, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Assessment of maxillary sinus septa using cone-beam computed tomography: etiological consideration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:52-8.
  • 19. Zhao Y, Nguyen M, Gohl E, Mah JK, Sameshima G, Enciso R. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid palatal expansion evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:71-8.
  • 20. Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallya S. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints. Aust Dent J 2012;57:109-18.
  • 21. Özbay Y, Erdemir A. Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografinin kullanmı. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;18:139-150.
  • 22. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008;34:87-9.
  • 23. Ball RL, Barbizam JV, Cohenca N. Intraoperative endodontic applications of cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39:548-57.
  • 24. Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, De Araújo Estrela CR. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1491-7.
  • 25. Solak Kolcakoglu K, Amuk M. Çocuk diş hekimliğinde konik ışınlı bilgisayarli tomografi istek nedenleri. JHS. 2021;30:68-73.
  • 26. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannawar LG, Parushetti AD. CBCT in orthodontics: the wave of future. J Contemp Dent Pract.2013;14:153-7.
  • 27. van der Stelt PF. Conebeamcomputertomografie: is meer ook beter? Cone beam computed tomography: is more also better? Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2016;123:189-98.

REASONS OF DENTAL VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY REQUESTS IN A FACULTY OF DENTISTRY

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: Supplement, 13 - 18, 25.03.2022

Gediz Geduk Emre Haylaz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1025444

Öz

ABSTRACT
Objectives: Examining the reasons for the request of Dental Volumetric Tomography (DVT) by physicians may be beneficial in terms of improving the technique by determining the usage areas in dentistry faculties. The aim of this study is to examine the causes of DVT requests in patients who applied to the faculty of dentistry, and the distribution of these requests according to department, age and gender.
Material and Methods: In this study, Dental Volumetric Tomography (Veraviewapocs 3D R100 (J. Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japan)) request forms of 1571 patients between 2016-2019, taken at the Department of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry of Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, were retrospectively analyzed. The age and gender of the patients included in the study, the reasons for requesting DVT and the departments requesting DVT were recorded. Chi-square test was applied on the obtained data to evaluate the relationship between descriptive statistics and reasons for desire age and gender. SPSS 22.0 Package Data Program (SPSS 22.0 Software Package Program, Inc.. Chicago, IL, ABD) was used as statistical software in the study.
Results: Of the 1571 patients included in the study, 836 were female and 735 were male, and the mean age was 40.44±0.624 and 39.93±0.683 respectively. Considering the reasons for the DVT request of the patients included in the study, it is seen that the most requests were made for the evaluation of pre-operative implant planning (29.5%), the lesion (20.6%), and the third molar (11.6%) impacted in the mandible, respectively. In addition to these, a total of 26 different causes of DVT were identified, such as TMJ, sinus and trauma evaluations. When we look at the relationship between the reasons for the request and gender in the whole patient group, a significant difference was found compared to the chi-square test. (p<0.05)
Conclusions: With the use of DVT in dentistry, its diagnosis and diagnosis capacity has started to develop rapidly. DVT, which enables three-dimensional imaging, enables the evaluation of anatomical structures in the head and neck region with its high resolution capacity. The use of Dental Volumetric Tomography in dentistry is increasing day by day due to its advantages such as giving clear images in terms of radiographically and examining the obtained sections from different angles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Volumetric Tomography indication implant planning lesion

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES 1. Scarfe WC and Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-730.
  • 2. Scarfe WC, Farman AG and Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
  • 3. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, & Andreis IB. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European Radiology 1998:8;1558-1564.
  • 4. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:102-121.
  • 5. Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Australian Dental Journal 2017;62:33-50.
  • 6. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:265-9.
  • 7. Ganz SD. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:515-536.
  • 8. Tarım Ertaş E, Kalabalık F. The indications for dental volumetric tomography in a turkish population sample. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2015;24:232-240.
  • 9. Menziletoğlu D, Işık BK and Güler AY. Reasons of cone-beam computed tomography requests in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2019;15:64-69.
  • 10. Özcan M, Keçeli S, Cenk Mehmet H. The comparison of panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for vertical bone height in maxillary posterior are. Yeditepe Dental Journal 2016;12:39-46.
  • 11. Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol 2011;82:395-402.
  • 12. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 2004;75:631-45.
  • 13. Kaneda T, Minami M, Kurabayashi T. Benign odontogenic tumors of the mandible and maxilla. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003;13:495-507.
  • 14. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J. 2009;207:23-8.
  • 15. Akarslan Z, Peker I. Bir diş hekimliği fakültesindeki konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi incelemesi istenme nedenleri. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2015;32:1-6.
  • 16. Ahmad M, Jenny J, Downie M. Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Aust Dent J 2012;57:82-94
  • 17. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25.
  • 18. Naitoh M, Suenaga Y, Kondo S, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Assessment of maxillary sinus septa using cone-beam computed tomography: etiological consideration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:52-8.
  • 19. Zhao Y, Nguyen M, Gohl E, Mah JK, Sameshima G, Enciso R. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid palatal expansion evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:71-8.
  • 20. Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallya S. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints. Aust Dent J 2012;57:109-18.
  • 21. Özbay Y, Erdemir A. Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografinin kullanmı. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;18:139-150.
  • 22. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008;34:87-9.
  • 23. Ball RL, Barbizam JV, Cohenca N. Intraoperative endodontic applications of cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39:548-57.
  • 24. Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, De Araújo Estrela CR. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1491-7.
  • 25. Solak Kolcakoglu K, Amuk M. Çocuk diş hekimliğinde konik ışınlı bilgisayarli tomografi istek nedenleri. JHS. 2021;30:68-73.
  • 26. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannawar LG, Parushetti AD. CBCT in orthodontics: the wave of future. J Contemp Dent Pract.2013;14:153-7.
  • 27. van der Stelt PF. Conebeamcomputertomografie: is meer ook beter? Cone beam computed tomography: is more also better? Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2016;123:189-98.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Gediz Geduk 0000-0002-9650-2149

Emre Haylaz 0000-0001-7330-9525

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Mart 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Kasım 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022Cilt: 25 Sayı: Supplement

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Geduk G, Haylaz E (01 Mart 2022) REASONS OF DENTAL VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY REQUESTS IN A FACULTY OF DENTISTRY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 Supplement 13–18.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.