Abstract
References
- Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:571-96.
- Kırzıoğlu Z, Çiftçi ZZ, Yetiş CÇ. Clinical Success of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin as a Space Maintainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:188-193.
- Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas DR. Prediction of first molar occlusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:610-21.
- Terlaje RD, Donly KJ. Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:109-14.
- Russell KA. Orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:418-21.
- Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. ‘Metal to resin’: a comparative evalution of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:111-6.
- Kargul B, Caglar E, Kabalay U. Glass fiber-reinfored composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:109-12.
- Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41:612-8.
- Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a prospective study. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:267-72.
- Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC Dent Child 1999;66:383-6.
- Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space Maintainers in Dentistry: Past to Present. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2402-5.
- Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss of Primary First Molars: A Systematic Rewiew. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297-302.
- Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conventional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models, Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
- Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
- Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002;3:250-254.
- Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:86-94.
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
- Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62.
- Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
- Türköz Ç. Dijital Ortodontik Modeller. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;26:181-7.
- Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
- Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impresion technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21.
- Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: A comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:107-13.
- Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobsan A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300-4.
- Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.
- Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:1-4.
- Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:269-73.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to
compare the measurements of the extraction spaces in the plaster models and
digital dental models and to investigate the usability of the digital models in
preventive and interceptive appliances in pediatric dentistry clinics.
Material and Methods:
In the dental models of 56 patients whose first molar teeth were extracted in
the early period, the dental arch length of the extraction spaces were measured
with a digital caliper in the plaster model (Control Group), with computer
software in the digital model (Experimental Group). Measured values were
compared using a t-test and statistical significance levels were determined.
Results: In plaster models and digital
models, the measured mean arc length of the extraction spaces were 6.94 mm and
6.83 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference
between the two measurement methods (p>0.05).
Conclusions: The use of digital
models is recommended in pediatric dentistry clinics due to shorter chair time
in pediatric patients, effective treatment planning/follow-ups, reducing treatment
costs and other advantages.
Keywords
References
- Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:571-96.
- Kırzıoğlu Z, Çiftçi ZZ, Yetiş CÇ. Clinical Success of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin as a Space Maintainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:188-193.
- Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas DR. Prediction of first molar occlusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:610-21.
- Terlaje RD, Donly KJ. Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:109-14.
- Russell KA. Orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:418-21.
- Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. ‘Metal to resin’: a comparative evalution of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:111-6.
- Kargul B, Caglar E, Kabalay U. Glass fiber-reinfored composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:109-12.
- Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41:612-8.
- Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a prospective study. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:267-72.
- Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC Dent Child 1999;66:383-6.
- Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space Maintainers in Dentistry: Past to Present. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2402-5.
- Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss of Primary First Molars: A Systematic Rewiew. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297-302.
- Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conventional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models, Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
- Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
- Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002;3:250-254.
- Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:86-94.
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
- Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62.
- Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
- Türköz Ç. Dijital Ortodontik Modeller. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;26:181-7.
- Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
- Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impresion technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21.
- Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: A comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:107-13.
- Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobsan A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300-4.
- Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.
- Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:1-4.
- Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:269-73.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 29, 2019 |
| Submission Date | August 29, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 |
Cited By
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.