BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2014, , 267 - 278, 20.02.2014
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000006298

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of salivary contamination on bond strength to dentin during different application stages of 3 different adhesive systemsMaterials and Methods: Twenty-four caries-free human molars were sectioned horizontally with a diamond saw to expose 1 mm thick dentin disks. Totally 48 disks (two dentin disks from each tooth) were obtained and these disks were randomly divided into 3 groups according to adhesives used (Prime Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond). Each adhesive group was further subdivided into 4 groups according to contamination methods as follows: no contamination which was the control group, contamination before adhesive application, contamination after adhesive application and contamination after polymerization of the adhesive. Transparent plastic cylindrical molds with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm and a height of 1 mm were used to place composite resin on dentin disks in order to test the microshear bond strength of the groups Three resin cylinders were attached on each dentin surface and 12 specimens were made for each group. Data were analyzed by one way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.Results: Except when contamination occurred after the polymerization of two step self-etch adhesive, bond strength values of all groups showed statistically significant reduction compared with control groups (p<0.05).Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that, saliva contamination affects the bond strength to dentin of all adhesives used in this study and the type of adhesive and the stage of contamination can be effective on the bond strength of adhesive contaminated with saliva

Kaynakça

  • 1. Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange, M. Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J  Adhes Dent 1999;1:219-232.
  • 2. Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS, Parolia A. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J  Conserv Dent 2010;13:71-75.
  • 3. Suryakumari, NB, Reddy PS, Surender LR, Kiran R. In vitro evaluation of influence of salivary contamination on the dentin bond strength of onebottle adhesive systems. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2:160-164.
  • 4. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9: 295-299.
  • 5. Furuse AY, da Cunha LF, Benetti AR, Mondelli J. Bond strength of resinresin interfaces contaminated with saliva and submitted to different surface treatments. J  Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:501-505.
  • 6. Kermanshah H, Ghabraei Sh ve Bitaraf  T. Effect of salivary contamination during different bonding stages on shear dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch and total etch adhesive. J  Dent (Tehran) 2010;7:132-138.
  • 7. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using allin-one adhesives. J  Adhes Dent, 2006;8:311-318.
  • 8. Yoo HM, Oh TS, Pereira PN. Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of onestep self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:127-134.
  • 9. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1998;29:567-572.
  • 10. Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido  T, Nomura S, Burrow MF, Tagami  J. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2003;19(5):429-434.
  • 11. Hegde MN, Bhandary S. An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent 2008;11,71-75.
  • 12. Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive. J  Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 895-901.
  • 13. Aboushelib MN. Clinical performance of self-etching adhesives with saliva contamination. J  Adhes Dent 2011;13:489-493.
  • 14. Pinzon LM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL, Dusevish V, Spencer P, Marshall GW. Effect of mucoprotein on the bond strength of resin composite to human dentin. Odontology 2011;99: 119-128.
  • 15. Sheikh H, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ziemiecki TL, Ritter AV. Effect of saliva contamination and cleansing solutions on the bond strengths of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:402-410.
  • 16. Taskonak B, Sertgöz A. Shear bond strengths of saliva contaminated ‘one-bottle’ adhesives. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:559-564.
  • 17. Güller F, Şimşek M, Cebe F, Yıldız E, Yıldırım C. Bir Adeziv Sistemin Kanama Durdurucu Ajanlarla Kontamine Edilen Dentin Yüzeyine Bağlanma Dayanımı. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2014;17(1):42-47
  • 18. Chung CW, Yiu CK, King NM, Hiraishi N, Tay FR. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cement to dentin. J Dent 2009;37:923-931.
  • 19. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination on resinresin bond strength. Dent Mater 2004;20:37-44.
  • 20. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26: 50-62.
  • 21. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves  A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:100-121.
  • 22. Solak H, Tunca YM, Nazaroğlu NK. Gebelerde Tükürük Akış Hızındaki Değişimler. Türkiye Klin Dişhek Bil Derg 1997;3:33-35.
  • 23. el-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:83-87.
  • 24. Pashley DH, Nelson R, Kepler EE. The effects of plasma and salivary constituents on dentin permeability. J Dent Res 1982;61:978-981.
  • 25. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11:132-136.
  • 26. Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:437-442.
  • 27. Arı H, Dönmez N, Belli S. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on bond strength to pulp chamber dentin. Eur J Dent 2008;2:86-90.
  • 28. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011;56,Suppl 1:31-44.
  • 29. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive system. J Prosthet Dentistry 2007;97:216-222.
  • 30. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the compositedentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.

Farklı uygulama basamaklarında oluşan tükürük kontaminasyonunun 3 adeziv sistemin dentine bağlanma dayanımlarına etkisinin incelenmesi

Yıl 2014, , 267 - 278, 20.02.2014
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000006298

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of salivary contamination on bond strength to dentin during different application stages of 3 different adhesive systems

Materials and Methods: Twenty-four caries-free human molars were sectioned horizontally with a diamond saw to expose 1 mm thick dentin disks. Totally 48 disks (two dentin disks from each tooth) were obtained and these disks were randomly divided into 3 groups according to adhesives used (Prime Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond). Each adhesive group was further subdivided into 4 groups according to contamination methods as follows: no contamination which was the control group, contamination before adhesive application, contamination after adhesive application and contamination after polymerization of the adhesive. Transparent plastic cylindrical molds with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm and a height of 1 mm were used to place composite resin on dentin disks in order to test the microshear bond strength of the groups Three resin cylinders were attached on each dentin surface and 12 specimens were made for each group. Data were analyzed by one way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.

Results: Except when contamination occurred after the polymerization of two step self-etch adhesive, bond strength values of all groups showed statistically significant reduction compared with control groups (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that, saliva contamination affects the bond strength to dentin of all adhesives used in this study and the type of adhesive and the stage of contamination can be effective on the bond strength of adhesive contaminated with saliva.

 

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 3 farklı adeziv sistemin farklı uygulama basamaklarında oluşan tükürük kontaminasyonunun, adeziv sistemlerin dentine bağlanma dayanımları üzerine etkisini incelemektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Yirmi dört molar dişin kullanıldığı çalışmamızda, mikro kesit alma cihazıyla her bir dişten 2 adet olmak üzere toplam 48 adet 1 mm’lik horizontal dentin kesidi elde edilmiş ve bu kesitler, test edilen adeziv sistemin tipine göre (Prime Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond) rastgele 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Daha sonra her adeziv sistem için biri kontrol grubu olmak üzere tükürük kontaminasyonunun olduğu aşamaya göre (adeziv öncesi, adeziv sonrası ve polimerizasyon sonrası) 4 alt grup oluşturulmuştur. Her dentin diski üzerine 3 adet 0.7 mm çapında ve 1 mm yüksekliğinde kompozit rezin silindir yerleştirilmiştir (n=12) ve mikro makaslama test yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Veriler tek yön ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: İki basamaklı self-etch adezivin polimerizasyon sonrası grubu hariç diğer bütün grupların bağlanma dayanım değerlerinde kontrol grubuna göre düşüş saptanmıştır (p<0.05). Self-etch adezivlerde adeziv sonrası tükürük kontaminasyonu sonucu elde edilen değerler, adeziv öncesi tükürük kontaminasyonu sonucu elde edilen değerlere göre istatistiksel olarak daha yüksek bulunurken, etch and rinse adezivde bu 2 grup arasındaki farkın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı görülmüştür (p<0.05).

Sonuçlar: Tükürük kontaminasyonunun adeziv sistemlerin dentine bağlanma dayanımlarını etkilediği ve bu etkinin adeziv sistemin tipine ve kontaminasyonun olduğu basamağa göre değişiklik gösterdiği sonucuna varılabilir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange, M. Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J  Adhes Dent 1999;1:219-232.
  • 2. Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS, Parolia A. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J  Conserv Dent 2010;13:71-75.
  • 3. Suryakumari, NB, Reddy PS, Surender LR, Kiran R. In vitro evaluation of influence of salivary contamination on the dentin bond strength of onebottle adhesive systems. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2:160-164.
  • 4. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9: 295-299.
  • 5. Furuse AY, da Cunha LF, Benetti AR, Mondelli J. Bond strength of resinresin interfaces contaminated with saliva and submitted to different surface treatments. J  Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:501-505.
  • 6. Kermanshah H, Ghabraei Sh ve Bitaraf  T. Effect of salivary contamination during different bonding stages on shear dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch and total etch adhesive. J  Dent (Tehran) 2010;7:132-138.
  • 7. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using allin-one adhesives. J  Adhes Dent, 2006;8:311-318.
  • 8. Yoo HM, Oh TS, Pereira PN. Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of onestep self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:127-134.
  • 9. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1998;29:567-572.
  • 10. Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido  T, Nomura S, Burrow MF, Tagami  J. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2003;19(5):429-434.
  • 11. Hegde MN, Bhandary S. An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent 2008;11,71-75.
  • 12. Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive. J  Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 895-901.
  • 13. Aboushelib MN. Clinical performance of self-etching adhesives with saliva contamination. J  Adhes Dent 2011;13:489-493.
  • 14. Pinzon LM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL, Dusevish V, Spencer P, Marshall GW. Effect of mucoprotein on the bond strength of resin composite to human dentin. Odontology 2011;99: 119-128.
  • 15. Sheikh H, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ziemiecki TL, Ritter AV. Effect of saliva contamination and cleansing solutions on the bond strengths of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:402-410.
  • 16. Taskonak B, Sertgöz A. Shear bond strengths of saliva contaminated ‘one-bottle’ adhesives. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:559-564.
  • 17. Güller F, Şimşek M, Cebe F, Yıldız E, Yıldırım C. Bir Adeziv Sistemin Kanama Durdurucu Ajanlarla Kontamine Edilen Dentin Yüzeyine Bağlanma Dayanımı. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2014;17(1):42-47
  • 18. Chung CW, Yiu CK, King NM, Hiraishi N, Tay FR. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cement to dentin. J Dent 2009;37:923-931.
  • 19. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination on resinresin bond strength. Dent Mater 2004;20:37-44.
  • 20. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26: 50-62.
  • 21. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves  A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:100-121.
  • 22. Solak H, Tunca YM, Nazaroğlu NK. Gebelerde Tükürük Akış Hızındaki Değişimler. Türkiye Klin Dişhek Bil Derg 1997;3:33-35.
  • 23. el-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:83-87.
  • 24. Pashley DH, Nelson R, Kepler EE. The effects of plasma and salivary constituents on dentin permeability. J Dent Res 1982;61:978-981.
  • 25. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11:132-136.
  • 26. Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:437-442.
  • 27. Arı H, Dönmez N, Belli S. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on bond strength to pulp chamber dentin. Eur J Dent 2008;2:86-90.
  • 28. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011;56,Suppl 1:31-44.
  • 29. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive system. J Prosthet Dentistry 2007;97:216-222.
  • 30. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the compositedentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Esra Cengiz

Hikmet Solak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Şubat 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Şubat 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Cengiz E, Solak H (01 Ağustos 2014) Farklı uygulama basamaklarında oluşan tükürük kontaminasyonunun 3 adeziv sistemin dentine bağlanma dayanımlarına etkisinin incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 17 3 267–278.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.