BibTex RIS Cite

Platform Switch Konsepti

Year 2013, , 348 - 357, 01.11.2013

Güliz Aktaş , Şenay Canay

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2013.1025

Abstract

Dental implantların uzun dönem başarısı, implant etrafındaki krestal kemik desteğine bağlıdır. Krestal kemik miktarının korunmasında platform switch konseptinin etkili olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu derlemede platform switch konsepti ve onunla ilgili olan anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak pubmed ve google akademik veri tabanında literatür taraması yapıldı. Elde edilen literatürler üç ana başlık (biyomekanik davranış, krestal kemik seviyesine etkisi, yumuşak dokuya etkisi) altında değerlendirildi. Platform switch konseptinin krestal kemik kaybını azalttığını ve daha estetik sonuçların alındığını gösteren çalışmaların yanısıra etkisi olmadığını gösteren çalışmalar da bulunmaktadır. Platform switch konseptinin etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi için uzun dönemli randomize klinik çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Keywords

Krestal kemik kaybı platform switch dental implant

References

  • Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63(12):995-996.
  • Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Thams U, San Roman F, Favero GA, et al. Interimplant distance and crestal bone resorption: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6(3):150-156.
  • Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platformswitched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):33-39.
  • Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implantabutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(1):16917
  • Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(2):299-308.
  • Canullo L, Iannello G, Penarocha M, Garcia B. Impact of implant diameter on bone level changes around platform switched implants: preliminary results of 18 months follow-up a prospective randomized match-paired controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(10):1142-1146.
  • Gardner D. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71(3):34-37.
  • Luongo R, Traini T, Guidone PC, Bianco G, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(6):551-557.
  • Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(1):9-17.
  • Priest GF. The esthetic challenge of adjacent implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):2-12.
  • Chow YC, Wang HL. Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):208-219.
  • Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16(2):165-175.
  • Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(6):995-1000.
  • Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(4):347-355.
  • Krishna Prasad D MS, Neha Bansal, Chethan Hegde. Platform Switching: An answer to crestal bone loss. Journal of Dental Implants 2011;1(1):13-17.
  • Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, Kenealy JN, Reddy MS. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in shortspan partial denture situations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(6):599-605.
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):577-581.
  • Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Erol S, Kutay O. Influence of platform-switching on marginal bone levels for implants with mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical study. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):250-258.
  • Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on periimplant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(3):4254
  • Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Aglietta M. A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(9):898-903.
  • Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(5):789-794.
  • Canay S, Akca K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):239-248.
  • Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(6):422-431. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):260-269.
  • Tabata LF, Assuncao WG, Adelino Ricardo Barao V, de Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):182-187.
  • Chang CL, Chen CS, Hsu ML. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):295-304.
  • Pessoa RS, Vaz LG, Marcantonio E, Jr, Vander Sloten J, Duyck J, Jaecques SV. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based threedimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(5):911-919.
  • Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):27127
  • Tabata LF, Rocha EP, Barao VA, Assuncao WG. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3):482-491.
  • Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 200 Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(1):9-17. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Immediate functional loading in the maxilla using implants with platform switching: five-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(6):1106-1112.
  • Prosper L, Crespi R, Valenti E, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Five-year follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: immediate versus delayed loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):6076
  • Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(4):414-420.
  • Calvo Guirado JL, Ortiz Ruiz AJ, Gomez Moreno G, Lopez Mari L, Bravo Gonzalez LA. Immediate loading and immediate restoration in 105 expanded-platform implants via the Diem System after a 16-month follow-up period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13(9):E576-81.
  • Cocchetto R, Traini T, Caddeo F, Celletti R. Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(2):16317
  • Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15(3):313-320.
  • Vigolo P, Givani A. Platformswitched restorations on widediameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(1):10310
  • Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on periimplant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(10):1185-1192. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(6):5325
  • Bateli M, Att W, Strub JR. Implant neck configurations for preservation of marginal bone level: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):290-303.
  • Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(1):115-121.
  • Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissuestabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):276-282.
  • Sorni-Broker M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14(9):e475-479.
  • Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71(4):5465
  • Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Mendez-Blanco V, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(2):14115 357

Platform switch konsepti nedir?

Year 2013, , 348 - 357, 01.11.2013

Güliz Aktaş , Şenay Canay

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2013.1025

Abstract

Dental implantların uzun dönem başarısı,implant etrafındaki krestal kemik desteğinebağlıdır. Krestal kemik miktarının korunmasındaplatform switch konseptinin etkili olduğudüşünülmektedir. Bu derlemede platform switchkonsepti ve onunla ilgili olan kullanılarak Pubmed ve Google Akademik veritabanında literatür taraması yapıldı. Elde edilenliteratürlerle konseptin etkisi üç ana başlık(biyomekanik davranış, krestal kemik seviyesi,yumuşak doku seviyesi) altında değerlendirildi.Platform switch konseptinin krestal kemik kaybınıazalttığı ve daha estetik sonuçların alındığınıgösteren çalışmaların yanısıra herhangi bir etkisininolmadığını gösteren çalışmalar da bulunmaktadır.Platform switch konseptinin etkinliğinindeğerlendirilmesi için uzun dönemli randomizeklinik çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Keywords

Krestal kemik kaybı platform switch dental implant.

References

  • Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63(12):995-996.
  • Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Thams U, San Roman F, Favero GA, et al. Interimplant distance and crestal bone resorption: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6(3):150-156.
  • Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platformswitched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):33-39.
  • Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implantabutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(1):16917
  • Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(2):299-308.
  • Canullo L, Iannello G, Penarocha M, Garcia B. Impact of implant diameter on bone level changes around platform switched implants: preliminary results of 18 months follow-up a prospective randomized match-paired controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(10):1142-1146.
  • Gardner D. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71(3):34-37.
  • Luongo R, Traini T, Guidone PC, Bianco G, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(6):551-557.
  • Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(1):9-17.
  • Priest GF. The esthetic challenge of adjacent implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):2-12.
  • Chow YC, Wang HL. Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):208-219.
  • Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16(2):165-175.
  • Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(6):995-1000.
  • Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(4):347-355.
  • Krishna Prasad D MS, Neha Bansal, Chethan Hegde. Platform Switching: An answer to crestal bone loss. Journal of Dental Implants 2011;1(1):13-17.
  • Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, Kenealy JN, Reddy MS. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in shortspan partial denture situations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(6):599-605.
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):577-581.
  • Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Erol S, Kutay O. Influence of platform-switching on marginal bone levels for implants with mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical study. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):250-258.
  • Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on periimplant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(3):4254
  • Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Aglietta M. A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(9):898-903.
  • Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(5):789-794.
  • Canay S, Akca K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):239-248.
  • Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(6):422-431. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):260-269.
  • Tabata LF, Assuncao WG, Adelino Ricardo Barao V, de Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):182-187.
  • Chang CL, Chen CS, Hsu ML. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):295-304.
  • Pessoa RS, Vaz LG, Marcantonio E, Jr, Vander Sloten J, Duyck J, Jaecques SV. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based threedimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(5):911-919.
  • Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):27127
  • Tabata LF, Rocha EP, Barao VA, Assuncao WG. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3):482-491.
  • Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 200 Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(1):9-17. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Immediate functional loading in the maxilla using implants with platform switching: five-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(6):1106-1112.
  • Prosper L, Crespi R, Valenti E, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Five-year follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: immediate versus delayed loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):6076
  • Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(4):414-420.
  • Calvo Guirado JL, Ortiz Ruiz AJ, Gomez Moreno G, Lopez Mari L, Bravo Gonzalez LA. Immediate loading and immediate restoration in 105 expanded-platform implants via the Diem System after a 16-month follow-up period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13(9):E576-81.
  • Cocchetto R, Traini T, Caddeo F, Celletti R. Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(2):16317
  • Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15(3):313-320.
  • Vigolo P, Givani A. Platformswitched restorations on widediameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(1):10310
  • Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on periimplant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(10):1185-1192. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(6):5325
  • Bateli M, Att W, Strub JR. Implant neck configurations for preservation of marginal bone level: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):290-303.
  • Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(1):115-121.
  • Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissuestabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):276-282.
  • Sorni-Broker M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14(9):e475-479.
  • Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71(4):5465
  • Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Mendez-Blanco V, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(2):14115 357
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Review
Authors

Güliz Aktaş

Şenay Canay

Publication Date November 1, 2013
Submission Date September 10, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2013

Cite

EndNote Aktaş G, Canay Ş (November 1, 2013) Platform switch konsepti nedir?. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 16 4 348–357.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.