Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods used to determine passive fit of implant supported prosthesis and the developed procedures to achive passive fit. The clinical and laboratory procedures employed for framework fabrication are inadequate to provide an absolute passive fit for implant-supported fixed superstructures. However ill-fitting implant frameworks may cause mechanical failures of the prostheses and the implant systems, or biologic complications of the surrounding tissue. Although some prosthetic complications are attributed to the lack of passive fit, its effect on implant success is questionable. Nevertheless, the clinical results of increasing applications of advanced technology to improve framework fit seem promising. This article reviews the clinical significance of passive fit, the factors that affect the final fit of implant supported frameworks and clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit.
Keywords: Implant, abutment, passive fit, implant supported prosthesis.
ÖZET
Bu çalışmanın amacı implant destekli protezlerde (İDP) pasif uyumu tespit etmek için kullanılan metotları ve pasif uyumun sağlanabilmesi için geliştirilen prosedürleri incelemektir. Üstyapı fabrikasyonu için kullanılan klinik ve laboratuar prosedürler İDP’de pasif uyumun tam olarak sağlanmasında yetersizdir. Uyumsuz altyapının mevcudiyeti implant destekli restorasyonlarda mekanik başarısızlığa veya çevre dokularda biyolojik komplikasyonlara neden olabilir. Bazı protetik komplikasyonlar uyumsuzluğa yol açmasına rağmen, pasif uyumun implant başarısında olan etkisi kesin değildir. Bununla beraber üstyapı uyumunu sağlamada kullanılan ileri teknolojinin artan uygulamalarının klinik sonuçları gelecek vaat etmektedir. Bu makalede pasif uyumun klinik önemi, İDP’in final uyumunu etkileyen faktörler ve pasif uyumun klinik değerlendirme metotları incelenmiştir.References
- Karl M, Rosch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic- veneered superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:324-330.[CrossRef]
- Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent ;81:7-13.[CrossRef] Skalak considerations prostheses. ;49:843-848.[CrossRef] Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.[CrossRef]
- Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive complete fixed prostheses. Part II: prosthetic aspect. J Prosthet Dent ;68:949-956.[CrossRef] Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ;9:627-635. K, R. Biomechanical osseointegrated in J Prosthet Dent effectiveness of supporting Gunne J, Jemt T, Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: a report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:143
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.[CrossRef]
- Bauman GR, Mills M, Rapley JW, Hallmon inflammation around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:330
- Haanaes HR. Implants and infections with special reference to oral bacteria. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:516-524. CrossRef]
- Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full arch fixed osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J ;9:169-178. Brånemark P-I. Osseointegration and its Prosthet CrossRef] Klineberg IJ, Murray GM. Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures. Swed Dent J 1985;28:63-69.
- Jemt T. Failures and complications in consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implant in the edentulous jaw: a study of treatment from the time of prostheses placement to the first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276.
- Yanase RT, Binnon PP, Jemt T, Gulbransen HJ, Parel S. Current issue form. How do you test a cast framework for a full arch fixed implant supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:471-474. J Dent
- Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. ;8:511-516. Goll GE. Production of accurately fitting full-arch implant frameworks. Part I. Clinical procedures, J Prosthet Dent 1991;377–384. [CrossRef]
- Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004;19:810-818.
- Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BR. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent, ;78:596-604.[CrossRef] Brudvik JS, Chigurupati K. The Milled Implant Bar: An Alternative to Spark Erosion. ;68(8):485-488. Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. ;96:47-52. [CrossRef] Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet CrossRef] Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An techniques implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444- [CrossRef]
- Loos L. A fixed prosthodontic technique osseointegrated titanium implants. J Prosthet CrossRef] Hollender L, Rockler B. Radiographic evaluation of osseointegrated implants of the jaws. Experimental study of the influence of radiographic techniques on the measurement of the relation between Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980;9:91-95.
- Cox JF, Pharoah M. An alternative holder for radiographic evaluation of tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:338-341.[CrossRef]
- May KB, Lang BR, Lang BE, Wang R. Periotest framework fit evaluation in vivo. J Prosthet CrossRef] Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10(2):85-92.[CrossRef] cast for mandibular Dent ;55:232-242. implant and bone. method:Implant-supported Dent ;79:648-657.
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı implant destekli protezlerde (İDP) pasif uyumu tespit etmek için kullanılanmetotları ve pasif uyumun sağlanabilmesi için geliştirilen fabrikasyonu için kullanılan klinik ve laboratuar prosedürler İDP’de pasif uyumun tam olarak sağlanmasında yetersizdir. Uyumsuz altyapının mevcudiyeti implant mekanik başarısızlığa veya çevre dokularda biyolojik komplikasyonlara neden olabilir. Bazı protetik komplikasyonlar uyumsuzluğa yol açmasına rağmen, pasif uyumun implant başarısında olan etkisi kesin değildir. Bununla beraber üstyapı uyumunu sağlamada kullanılan ileri teknolojinin artan uygulamalarının klinik sonuçları gelecek vaat etmektedir. Bu makalede pasif uyumun klinik önemi, İDP’in final uyumunu etkileyen faktörler ve pasif uyumun klinik değerlendirme metotları incelenmiştir
References
- Karl M, Rosch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic- veneered superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:324-330.[CrossRef]
- Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent ;81:7-13.[CrossRef] Skalak considerations prostheses. ;49:843-848.[CrossRef] Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.[CrossRef]
- Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive complete fixed prostheses. Part II: prosthetic aspect. J Prosthet Dent ;68:949-956.[CrossRef] Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ;9:627-635. K, R. Biomechanical osseointegrated in J Prosthet Dent effectiveness of supporting Gunne J, Jemt T, Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: a report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:143
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.[CrossRef]
- Bauman GR, Mills M, Rapley JW, Hallmon inflammation around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:330
- Haanaes HR. Implants and infections with special reference to oral bacteria. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:516-524. CrossRef]
- Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full arch fixed osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J ;9:169-178. Brånemark P-I. Osseointegration and its Prosthet CrossRef] Klineberg IJ, Murray GM. Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures. Swed Dent J 1985;28:63-69.
- Jemt T. Failures and complications in consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implant in the edentulous jaw: a study of treatment from the time of prostheses placement to the first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276.
- Yanase RT, Binnon PP, Jemt T, Gulbransen HJ, Parel S. Current issue form. How do you test a cast framework for a full arch fixed implant supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:471-474. J Dent
- Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. ;8:511-516. Goll GE. Production of accurately fitting full-arch implant frameworks. Part I. Clinical procedures, J Prosthet Dent 1991;377–384. [CrossRef]
- Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004;19:810-818.
- Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BR. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent, ;78:596-604.[CrossRef] Brudvik JS, Chigurupati K. The Milled Implant Bar: An Alternative to Spark Erosion. ;68(8):485-488. Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. ;96:47-52. [CrossRef] Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet CrossRef] Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An techniques implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444- [CrossRef]
- Loos L. A fixed prosthodontic technique osseointegrated titanium implants. J Prosthet CrossRef] Hollender L, Rockler B. Radiographic evaluation of osseointegrated implants of the jaws. Experimental study of the influence of radiographic techniques on the measurement of the relation between Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980;9:91-95.
- Cox JF, Pharoah M. An alternative holder for radiographic evaluation of tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:338-341.[CrossRef]
- May KB, Lang BR, Lang BE, Wang R. Periotest framework fit evaluation in vivo. J Prosthet CrossRef] Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10(2):85-92.[CrossRef] cast for mandibular Dent ;55:232-242. implant and bone. method:Implant-supported Dent ;79:648-657.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Review |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 30, 2012 |
| Submission Date | April 20, 2011 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2012 |
Cited By
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.