Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Shalan, L.A. and H.F. Al-Huwaizi, Cleaning Efficiency of Root Canal after Irrigation with New Irrigation Technique: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Iran Endod J 2018; 13:102-107.
- 2. Abusrewil, S.M., W. McLean, and J.A. Scott, The use of Bioceramics as root-end filling materials in periradicular surgery: A literature review. The Saudi dental journal 2018; 30:273-282.
- 3. Shinbori, N., et al., Clinical outcome of endodontic microsurgery that uses EndoSequence BC root repair material as the root-end filling material. Journal of Endodontics 2015; 41: 607-612.
- 4. Adl, A., F. Sobhnamayan, and O. Kazemi, Comparison of push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium enriched mixture cement as root end filling materials. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014; 11:564-567.
- 5. Torabinejad, M., M. Parirokh, and P.M.H. Dummer, Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications. International Endodontic Journal 2018; 51:284-317.
- 6. Solanki, N.P., K.K. Venkappa, and N.C. Shah, Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling material: A systematic review. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD 2018; 21:10-15.
- 7. Kaur, M., et al., MTA versus Biodentine: review of literature with a comparative analysis. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2017; 11: ZG01–ZG05.
- 8. Zafar, K., S. Jamal, and R. Ghafoor, Bio-active cements-Mineral Trioxide Aggregate based calcium silicate materials: a narrative review. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2020; 70:497-504.
- 9. Abdul-Ameer, Z.M., S.A. Hamed, and R.H. Jehad, A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasonic Agitation on Push-Out Bond Strength of Three Root-End Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology 2021; 15:1694-1701.
- 10. Torres, F.F.E., et al., A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2021;46:e2.
- 11. Klein-Junior, C.A., et al., Cytotoxicity assessment of Bio-C Repair Íon+: A new calcium silicate-based cement. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 2021; 15:152-156.
- 12. Campi, L.B., et al.,. Brazilian Dental Journal 2023; 34:29-38.
- 13. Badr, A.E., Marginal adaptation Physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity and bioactivity of a ready-to-use bioceramic repair material and cytotoxicity of bone cement compared with amalgam and mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials. Journal of endodontics 2010; 36:1056-1060.
- 14. Naeem, A.M. and I.M. Al-Zaka, The influence of different root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of AH plus and Bioceramic sealers. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry 2021; 33:21-29.
- 15. Mandava, P., et al., Microleakage evaluation around retrograde filling materials prepared using conventional and ultrasonic techniques. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2015;9: ZC43 –ZC46.
- 16. Benetti, F., et al., Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use bioceramic repair material. Brazilian dental journal, 2019; 30:325-332.
- 17. Mahmoud, O., et al., Morphological and Chemical Analysis of Different Types of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements. International Journal of Dentistry 2022; 2022.
- 18. Ghilotti, J., et al., Comparative Surface Morphology, Chemical composition, and cytocompatibility of bio-c repair, biodentine, and proroot MTA on hDPCs. Materials, 2020. 13: 2189.
- 19. Gundam, S., et al., Comparison of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate, glass ionomer cement and intermediate restorative material as root-end filling materials, using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 2014; 17:566-570.
- 20. Jovanović, L.Z. and B.V. Bajkin, Scanning electron microscopy analysis of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate, tricalcium silicate cement, and dental amalgam as a root end filling materials. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2021 84:2068-2074.
- 21. Dimitrova, I. and Y. Kouzmanova, Impact of photodynamic therapy on the marginal adaptation of Biodentine used as root-end filling material. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 2023; 34:277-287.
- 22. Shalan, L., d Restorative Dentistry 25 The effect of blood contamination on compressive strength of two materials used in treatment of furcation perforation (A comparative study). Baghdad Science Journal 2012;24:25.
- 23. Ravichandra, P., et al., Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of BiodentineTM and other commonly used root end filling materials-an invitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2014; 8:243-245.
- 24. Vanti, A., H. Vagarali, and C. Patil, Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of two root end filling materials in root end preparation done with diamond points and ultrasonics-An in vitro SEM study. IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics 2021; 6:97-100.
- 25. Rodrigues, M.N.M., et al., Comparative analysis of bond strength to root dentin and compression of bioceramic cements used in regenerative endodontic procedures. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2021; 46:e59.
- 26. Marciano, M.A., et al., Physical, chemical, and biological properties of white MTA with additions of AlF3. Clinical oral investigations 2019; 23:33-41.
Evaluation the Marginal Adaptation for the Bio C Repair and Other Root end Filling Material by Using Scanning Electron Microscope (A Comparative In Vitro Study)
Öz
АBSTRАCT:
Background: The ability of the retrograde filling material to adhere to dentin has a substantial impact on the success of endodontic procedures. the marginal adaptation of the rᴏᴏt end filling materials considered important factor, since it demonstrates the materials adaptation to the dentinal walls.
Objective: Assess the marginal adaptation of Biᴏ-C reparative materials in contrast to MTA (АNGELUS) and Amalgam.
Material and method: A total of thirty human maxillary central incisors teeth that each had a single root were chosen. To keep the root canal length at 15mm, the crown was resected. The teeth underwent endodontic treatment, along with the resection of their root ends and preparation of root-end cavities. On the basis of the type of filling, the teeth were categorized into one of three groups, as follows: (А) Bio-C repair (Bioceramic reparative material), (B) MTА АNGELUS, (C) Amalgam. teeth were sectioned in longitudinal manner, marginal gabs measured by the use of a scanning electron microscope. Data was statically analyzed using АNOVА and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (Tukey's HSD).
Results: Bio-C Repair material and MTA show better marginal adaptation with significant difference between them and amalgam, no significant different between Bio-C repair group and MTA group.
Conclusion: marginal adaptation better for Bio-C repair in comparison to Amalgam and MTА АNGELUS
Anahtar Kelimeler
Keywords: Bioceramic marginal adaptation MTА scanning electron microscope
Kaynakça
- 1. Shalan, L.A. and H.F. Al-Huwaizi, Cleaning Efficiency of Root Canal after Irrigation with New Irrigation Technique: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Iran Endod J 2018; 13:102-107.
- 2. Abusrewil, S.M., W. McLean, and J.A. Scott, The use of Bioceramics as root-end filling materials in periradicular surgery: A literature review. The Saudi dental journal 2018; 30:273-282.
- 3. Shinbori, N., et al., Clinical outcome of endodontic microsurgery that uses EndoSequence BC root repair material as the root-end filling material. Journal of Endodontics 2015; 41: 607-612.
- 4. Adl, A., F. Sobhnamayan, and O. Kazemi, Comparison of push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium enriched mixture cement as root end filling materials. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014; 11:564-567.
- 5. Torabinejad, M., M. Parirokh, and P.M.H. Dummer, Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications. International Endodontic Journal 2018; 51:284-317.
- 6. Solanki, N.P., K.K. Venkappa, and N.C. Shah, Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling material: A systematic review. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD 2018; 21:10-15.
- 7. Kaur, M., et al., MTA versus Biodentine: review of literature with a comparative analysis. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2017; 11: ZG01–ZG05.
- 8. Zafar, K., S. Jamal, and R. Ghafoor, Bio-active cements-Mineral Trioxide Aggregate based calcium silicate materials: a narrative review. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2020; 70:497-504.
- 9. Abdul-Ameer, Z.M., S.A. Hamed, and R.H. Jehad, A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasonic Agitation on Push-Out Bond Strength of Three Root-End Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology 2021; 15:1694-1701.
- 10. Torres, F.F.E., et al., A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2021;46:e2.
- 11. Klein-Junior, C.A., et al., Cytotoxicity assessment of Bio-C Repair Íon+: A new calcium silicate-based cement. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 2021; 15:152-156.
- 12. Campi, L.B., et al.,. Brazilian Dental Journal 2023; 34:29-38.
- 13. Badr, A.E., Marginal adaptation Physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity and bioactivity of a ready-to-use bioceramic repair material and cytotoxicity of bone cement compared with amalgam and mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials. Journal of endodontics 2010; 36:1056-1060.
- 14. Naeem, A.M. and I.M. Al-Zaka, The influence of different root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of AH plus and Bioceramic sealers. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry 2021; 33:21-29.
- 15. Mandava, P., et al., Microleakage evaluation around retrograde filling materials prepared using conventional and ultrasonic techniques. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2015;9: ZC43 –ZC46.
- 16. Benetti, F., et al., Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use bioceramic repair material. Brazilian dental journal, 2019; 30:325-332.
- 17. Mahmoud, O., et al., Morphological and Chemical Analysis of Different Types of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements. International Journal of Dentistry 2022; 2022.
- 18. Ghilotti, J., et al., Comparative Surface Morphology, Chemical composition, and cytocompatibility of bio-c repair, biodentine, and proroot MTA on hDPCs. Materials, 2020. 13: 2189.
- 19. Gundam, S., et al., Comparison of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate, glass ionomer cement and intermediate restorative material as root-end filling materials, using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 2014; 17:566-570.
- 20. Jovanović, L.Z. and B.V. Bajkin, Scanning electron microscopy analysis of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate, tricalcium silicate cement, and dental amalgam as a root end filling materials. Microscopy Research and Technique, 2021 84:2068-2074.
- 21. Dimitrova, I. and Y. Kouzmanova, Impact of photodynamic therapy on the marginal adaptation of Biodentine used as root-end filling material. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 2023; 34:277-287.
- 22. Shalan, L., d Restorative Dentistry 25 The effect of blood contamination on compressive strength of two materials used in treatment of furcation perforation (A comparative study). Baghdad Science Journal 2012;24:25.
- 23. Ravichandra, P., et al., Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of BiodentineTM and other commonly used root end filling materials-an invitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2014; 8:243-245.
- 24. Vanti, A., H. Vagarali, and C. Patil, Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of two root end filling materials in root end preparation done with diamond points and ultrasonics-An in vitro SEM study. IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics 2021; 6:97-100.
- 25. Rodrigues, M.N.M., et al., Comparative analysis of bond strength to root dentin and compression of bioceramic cements used in regenerative endodontic procedures. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2021; 46:e59.
- 26. Marciano, M.A., et al., Physical, chemical, and biological properties of white MTA with additions of AlF3. Clinical oral investigations 2019; 23:33-41.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 29 Eylül 2023 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 6 Mart 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.