Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS

Yıl 2022, , 131 - 136, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1103381

Öz

ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study evaluated the marginal adaptation and microleakage of the İn-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse press all-ceramic porcelain systems.
Material and methods: Thirty maxillary Central teeth extracted for periodontal reasons without caries and cracks were divided equally into three group and there was no control group; only the three systems were compared. Sample teeth cemented were stored in distile water for 24 hours. Then, they were applied to a repeated thermal cycle for 500 times. The samples were left in %5 of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. For the marginal adaptation rankings, all of the sample teeth for which cross-sections were made were moved into the metal microscope (Scherr Turico St. James/ Minn./ USA) and the marginal adaptation degrees were measured in both the palatinal and vestibul regions by measuring twice with x10 enlargement at micron level. For the statistical evaluations of marginal adaptation and microleakage values, Kruskal Wallis test has been used (p>0.05). Results: The differences between the three all-ceramic porcelain systems are not significant (p>0.05), α=0.05).
Conclusion: The Finesse porcelain system caused the least leakage in both regions. In second place in both regions was In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia caused the most leakage in both regions. The biggest margin gap in the palatal region was seen in the Finesse porcelain system, In-Ceram Zirconia in second place. The least marginal gap was caused by the In- Ceram Alumina porcelain system.

Destekleyen Kurum

This investigation was supported by CUBAP grant No:Dis 04, (Cumhuriyet University Research Fund Sivas -TURKEY)

Proje Numarası

Diş:04

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES 1. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
  • 2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentİstry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32.
  • 3. Davis DR. Comparison of adaptation of two types of alt ceramic crowm. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-16.
  • 4. Sulatman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, VVozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478- 484.
  • 5. Participants of CSP No. 147/242, Morris, HF: Department of veterans affairs Cooperative Studies Project No. 242. Quantitave and qualitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:198-204.
  • 6. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal adaptation of porcelain fussed to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.
  • 7. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-590.
  • 8. Taylor M, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
  • 9. Zaimoglu A Karaagaclioglu L, Uctasli S. Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resin on microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:319-327.
  • 10. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 Jan-Feb;26(l):60-69.
  • 11. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001 Jul;17(4):340-346.
  • 12. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Moura SK. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive Systems under thermal and mechanical stresses. Am J Dent 2002 Jun; 15(3): 164-168.
  • 13. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99 . 14. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure.
  • 15. Wendt SL, Innes, PM, Dickinson GL: The Effect of Thermocycling in Microleakage Analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-184.
  • 16. Serensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dem 1992 Jan;67(l): 16-22.
  • 17. Schaerer P, Şato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of three cast ceramic crown Systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988 May;59(5):534-542.
  • 18. Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992 May;67(5):594-599.
  • 19. Gardner FM, Tillman-McCombs KW, Gaston ML, Runyan DA. In vitro failure load of metal-collar margins compared with porcelain facial margins of metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Jul;78(l):l-4.
  • 20. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Dec;66(6):747-753.
Yıl 2022, , 131 - 136, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1103381

Öz

Proje Numarası

Diş:04

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES 1. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
  • 2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentİstry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32.
  • 3. Davis DR. Comparison of adaptation of two types of alt ceramic crowm. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-16.
  • 4. Sulatman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, VVozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478- 484.
  • 5. Participants of CSP No. 147/242, Morris, HF: Department of veterans affairs Cooperative Studies Project No. 242. Quantitave and qualitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:198-204.
  • 6. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal adaptation of porcelain fussed to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.
  • 7. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-590.
  • 8. Taylor M, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
  • 9. Zaimoglu A Karaagaclioglu L, Uctasli S. Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resin on microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:319-327.
  • 10. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 Jan-Feb;26(l):60-69.
  • 11. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001 Jul;17(4):340-346.
  • 12. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Moura SK. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive Systems under thermal and mechanical stresses. Am J Dent 2002 Jun; 15(3): 164-168.
  • 13. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99 . 14. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure.
  • 15. Wendt SL, Innes, PM, Dickinson GL: The Effect of Thermocycling in Microleakage Analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-184.
  • 16. Serensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dem 1992 Jan;67(l): 16-22.
  • 17. Schaerer P, Şato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of three cast ceramic crown Systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988 May;59(5):534-542.
  • 18. Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992 May;67(5):594-599.
  • 19. Gardner FM, Tillman-McCombs KW, Gaston ML, Runyan DA. In vitro failure load of metal-collar margins compared with porcelain facial margins of metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Jul;78(l):l-4.
  • 20. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Dec;66(6):747-753.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Akın Coşkun 0000-0001-6718-9504

Suat Yaluğ 0000-0003-2116-2685

Proje Numarası Diş:04
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 14 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Coşkun A, Yaluğ S (01 Haziran 2022) EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 2 131–136.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.