Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and
compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two
different surface treatments.
Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42
impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the
effects of surface treatments. Two different surface treatments (37% phosphoric
acid and 17% EDTA) were applied to the samples to compare the dentin tubule
penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive –which had been using for
treatment of dentin hypersensitivity- (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M, Germany) and a
resin infiltration system (ICON, DMG, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy
was used to investigate the tubule penetration effectiveness. For statistical
analysis, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and
One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests were used.
Results: ICON
had shown significantly more resin penetration intensity and more resin
penetration depth than Adper Single Bond 2 (p<0.05). Phosphoric acid
treatment groups had shown significantly more penetration intensity than EDTA
treated groups (p=0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it
can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin
infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Articles |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Eylül 2019 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 21 Mayıs 2018 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3 |