Teknik Not
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Mandibular kanalın az bilinen çok görülen anatomik varyasyonu: Bifid mandibular kanal

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 435 - 438, 25.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1279627

Öz

Günümüz diş hekimliğinde mandibulada yapılacak cerrahi işlemler öncesi mandibular kanala ilişkin varyasyonların değerlendirmesi ve belirlenmesi posterior bölgeye yapılacak oral cerrahi işlemlere yönelik cerrahi esnasında ve sonrasında meydana gelebilecek komplikasyonların önlemesinde önem taşımaktadır. Bifid mandibular kanal mandibulada izlenen anatomik varyasyonlar arasında en sık bildirilen tür olmakla birlikte, tanımlanmasına ve yaygınlığının bilinirliğine yönelik bilgi düzeyinin düşük olduğu tahmin edilmektedir. Bu teknik notta yaygın görülmekle birlikte hakkındaki bilgi düzeyinin eksik olduğu bilinen bifid mandibular kanal varyasyonlarının görünümlerine ilişkin bilgi verilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, et al. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150310.
  • 2. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H, Vähätalo K, Tammisalo T, et al. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 33-9.
  • 3. Renton T, Dawood A, Shah A, Searson L, Yilmaz Z. Post-implant neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. A case series. Br Dent J 2012; 212: E17.
  • 4. Sanchis JM, Peñarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 422-4.
  • 5. Ngeow WC, Chai WL. The clinical anatomy of accessory mandibular canal in dentistry. Clin Anat 2020; 33: 1214-27.
  • 6. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida JJ, Cariseo C, Gold M, Díaz D, Orellana M, Iwanaga J. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43: 1259-72.
  • 7. Dereci O. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of mandibular anatomic variations. Yeditepe J Dent 2018; 14: 31-6.
  • 8. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A, Marsillas-Rascado S, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20140090.
  • 9. Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi KS, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS, Naaz S, et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int 2023; 98: 176-84.
  • 10. Zhou X, Gao X, Zhang J. Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation. Surg Radiol Anat 2020; 42: 1073-9.
  • 11. Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 501-7.
  • 12. Iwanaga J, Takeshita Y, Matsushita Y, Hur MS, Ibaragi S, Tubbs RS. What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology. Surg Radiol Anat 2022; 44: 147-56.
  • 13. Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1212-18.
  • 14. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 155-9.

Common but lesser-known anatomical variation of the mandibular canal: Bifid mandibular canal

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 435 - 438, 25.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1279627

Öz

Evaluating the variations related to the mandibular canal before oral surgical procedures in the mandible is essential in preventing complications that may occur during and after surgery. Although the bifid mandibular canal is the most frequently reported anatomical variation in the mandible, the level of knowledge regarding its identification and prevalence is estimated to be low. This technical note aims to provide information about the appearance of bifid mandibular canal variations, which are common but lesser known.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, et al. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150310.
  • 2. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H, Vähätalo K, Tammisalo T, et al. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 33-9.
  • 3. Renton T, Dawood A, Shah A, Searson L, Yilmaz Z. Post-implant neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. A case series. Br Dent J 2012; 212: E17.
  • 4. Sanchis JM, Peñarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 422-4.
  • 5. Ngeow WC, Chai WL. The clinical anatomy of accessory mandibular canal in dentistry. Clin Anat 2020; 33: 1214-27.
  • 6. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida JJ, Cariseo C, Gold M, Díaz D, Orellana M, Iwanaga J. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43: 1259-72.
  • 7. Dereci O. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of mandibular anatomic variations. Yeditepe J Dent 2018; 14: 31-6.
  • 8. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A, Marsillas-Rascado S, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20140090.
  • 9. Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi KS, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS, Naaz S, et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int 2023; 98: 176-84.
  • 10. Zhou X, Gao X, Zhang J. Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation. Surg Radiol Anat 2020; 42: 1073-9.
  • 11. Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 501-7.
  • 12. Iwanaga J, Takeshita Y, Matsushita Y, Hur MS, Ibaragi S, Tubbs RS. What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology. Surg Radiol Anat 2022; 44: 147-56.
  • 13. Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1212-18.
  • 14. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 155-9.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm Bilimsel mektup
Yazarlar

Cevahir Cengiz 0000-0001-9839-0470

Sara Samur Ergüven 0000-0002-6118-8081

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Eylül 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Nisan 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Cengiz C, Samur Ergüven S. Mandibular kanalın az bilinen çok görülen anatomik varyasyonu: Bifid mandibular kanal. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;12(3):435-8.