Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Effect of Composite Resin Volume and Rapid Curing on Microleakage of Composite Restorations

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 329 - 333, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1626364

Abstract

Aim: Microleakage is one of the causes of failure of composite restorations that influenced many factors. The aim of this in-vitro study is to evaluate the effect of composite volume and rapid curing on microleakage of composite restorations.
Materials and Methods: 168 bovine incisors were randomly divided into 12 groups. Cylindrical cavities of 3 different diameters (2, 3 and 4 mm) and 2 different depths (1 and 2 mm) were prepared in the middle of the buccal surfaces of the teeth. The cavities were restored with a 7th generation adhesive system and micro-hybrid composite resin. Six of the groups were cured at 1000 mW/cm2 light power, while the other 6 groups were cured at 3200 mW/cm2. The restored teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. Then, the teeth were cut vertically to pass through the center of the restorations. The amount of microleakage was examined under a microscope. Data was analyzed with One-way Anova, Tukey and t tests (p=0.05).
Results: The highest average microleakage scores at the incisal margin were observed in the 3x2 mm sized cavities cured at 3200 mW/cm2 light power and in the 4x2 mm sized cavities cured at 1000 mW/cm light power (mean score= 0.86, p>0.05). The highest mean microleakage score at the gingival margin was observed in the 3x2 mm sized cavities cured at 1000 mW/cm light power (mean score: 1.43, p>0.05).
Conclusion: Considering the Pi value as 3.14, rapid polymerization of composite restorations with 3200 mW/cm2 power, a volume of 3.14 mm3 to 25.12 mm3 does not affect microleakage.

References

  • 1. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Hadis MA, Devaux J, Leloup G. Progress in dimethacrylate-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater 2013;29(2):139-156.
  • 2. Soares CJ, Faria-E-Silva AL, Rodrigues MP, Vilela ABF, Pfeifer CS, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know? Braz Oral Res 2017;31(suppl 1):e62.
  • 3. Guan X, Zhu TE, Zhang DH. Development in polymerization shrinkage control of dental light-cured resin composites: a literature review. J Adhes Sci Technol 2023;37(4):602-623.
  • 4. Algamaiah H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress development in ultra-rapid photo-polymerized bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2021;37(4):559-567.
  • 5. Stansbury JW, Trujillo-Lemon M, Lu H, Ding X, Lin Y, Ge J. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dent Mater 2005;21(1):56-67.
  • 6. Atria PJ, Sampaio CS, Cáceres E, Fernández J, Reis AF, Giannini M, Coelho PG, Hirata R. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of volumetric polymerization shrinkage and degree of conversion of composites cured by various light power outputs. Dent Mater J 2018;37(1):33-39.
  • 7. Par M, Marovic D, Attin T, Tarle Z, Taubock TT. Effect of rapid high-intensity light-curing on polymerization shrinkage properties of conventional and bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2020;101:103448.
  • 8. Demir K, Bayraktar Y. Evaluation of microleakage and degree of conversion of three composite res-ins polymerized at different power densities. Braz Dent Sci 2020;23(2).
  • 9. Braga RR, Boaro LC, Kuroe T, Azevedo CL, Singer JM. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and 'C' factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent Mater 2006;22(9):818-823.
  • 10. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976;4(5):199-206.
  • 11. Rathi SD, Nikhade P, Chandak M, Motwani N, Rathi C, Chandak M. Microleakage in composite resin restoration-a review article. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2020;9(12):1006-1011.
  • 12. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21(10):962-970.
  • 13. Watts DC, Satterthwaite JD. Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass. Dent Mater 2008;24(1):1-8.
  • 14. Aljehani W, Almakinah A, Alshahri A, Albluwy O, Alamray S, Alaiyed A, Alqahtani M, Faqiehi S, Alasmari N, Alkhaldi A, Alenazy F. Microleakage among different dental restorative materials: causes, detection, and impact on marginal integrity. J Health Sci 2023;3(11):489-497.
  • 15. Gamarra VSS, Borges GA, Junior LHB, Spohr AM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques. Odontology 2018;106(1):56-63.
  • 16. Costa Pfeifer CS, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(2):197-202.
  • 17. Bayraktar Y, Hatırlı H. Rapid polymerization and etching procedure effect on microleakage of Class V restorations. Clin Dent Res 2019;43(2):72-8.
  • 18. Mazaheri R, Pishevar L, Shichani AV, Geravandi S. Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(4):337-341.
  • 19. Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(4):1117-1124.
  • 20. de Almeida JB, Platt JA, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28(4):453-460.
  • 21. Agrawal VS, Parekh VV, Shah NC. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2012;37(5):E1-7.
  • 22. Sofiani E, Sari EI. The differences of microleakage smart dentin replacement, glass ionomer cement and a flowable resin composite as orifice barrier in root canal treated. 2022;25(3):211-216.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Restorative Dentistry
Journal Section RA
Authors

Yusuf Bayraktar 0000-0001-6250-5651

Merve Haberal 0000-0003-2804-0947

Ezgi Türkoğlu Tarı 0009-0002-6458-209X

Erhan Al 0009-0008-9436-2681

Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date February 21, 2025
Acceptance Date April 21, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 28 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Bayraktar Y, Haberal M, Türkoğlu Tarı E, Al E (September 1, 2025) Effect of Composite Resin Volume and Rapid Curing on Microleakage of Composite Restorations. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 28 3 329–333.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.