Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 431 - 441, 31.12.2023

Hüseyin Anıl Banazlı Oguzhan Gorler

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409547

Abstract

References

  • McKinney RV. Endosteal dental implants: Mosby Year Book, 1991.
  • Duymuş ZY, Güngör H. Dental Implant Materials. Ataturk Univ. Dent. Fak. Journal, 23(1):142-152, 2013.
  • Günay A, Durakbaşa N, Katiboğlu AB. Evaluation of Surface Modifications of G4 Pure Titanium Implants Used in Dental Implantology by Sandblasting and Pickling Techniques Considering the Manufacturing Stages. Engineer and Machinery, 54(641),37-43, 2013.
  • Wang RR, Fenton A. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int., 27:401-408, 1996.
  • Parr GR, Gardner LK, Toth RW. Titanium: the mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental materials aspects. J Prosthet Dent., 54:410-414,1985.
  • Kononen M, Rintanen J, Waltimo A, Kempainen P. Titanium framework removable partial denture used for patient allergic to other metals: a clinical report and literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent., 73:4-7, 1995.
  • Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clinical oral implants research, 20(4):32-47, 2009.
  • Stimmelmayr M. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant- abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 28(12):1215-1220, 2012.
  • Mish CE. Dental Implant Prostheses, Chapter: Clinical Biomechanics in Implant Dentistry 309-321, Mosby, 309 pp., 2009.
  • Nanda RS, Tosun Y. Biomechanics in Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 1st ed. Quintessence Publishing, Co. Inc. 2010.
  • Avallone E, Baumeister T, Sadegh A. Marks' standard handbook for mechanical engineers. 11 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
  • Adıgüzel Ö. Finite element analysis: a review Part I: areas of use in dentistry, basic concepts and element definitions. Dicle Dent. Derg., 11:18-23, 2010.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont, 11(5):517-521, 1998.
  • Lavkin HC. Biomimicry, dental implants and clinical trials. Journal of the American Dental Association, 129:226-230, 1998.
  • Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra- osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 3(2):81-100, 1969.
  • Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery Supplementum, 16:1-132, 1977.
  • Dere KA. Evaluation of Stress Values Generated in Type 2 Bone by Dental Implants with Two Different Geometries by Finite Element Analysis, 2017.
  • Fagon M. Implant Prosthodontics Surgical and Prosthetic. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Inc., 1990.
  • Davies JE. Mechanisms of endoosseous integration. J Prosthodontics, 11:391-401, 1998.
  • Edgerton M, Levine MJ. Biocompability: It's future in prosthodontic research. J Prosthet Dent., 69: 406-415, 1993.
  • Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, von Konow L, Lothigius E. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Impl Res., 9:225-234, 1998.
  • Preis V, et al. In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations, Journal of dentistry, 40.11:921-928, 2012.
  • Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, Liu R, Ma S, Zhou Z, Longquan S. Loadbearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials, 93- 101, 2014.
  • Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions, A systematic review. The International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 29 Suppl:84-98, 2014.
  • Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth J-F, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dental Materials. 28(12):1215-1220, 2012.
  • Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung K-H, Mancl LA. In vitro evaluation of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 109(4):255-263, 2013.
  • Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(1):12-18, 2012.
  • Baldassari M, Hjerppe J, Romeo D, Fickl S, Thompson VP, Stappert CF. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 30(3), 2012.
  • Gehrke P, Johannson D, Fischer C, Stawarczyk B, Beuer F. In vitro Fatigue and Fracture Resistance of One-and Two-piece CAD/CAM Zirconia Implant Abutments. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 30(3), 546-554, 2015.
  • Nouh I, Kern M, Sabet AE, Aboelfadl AK, Hamdy AM, Chaar MS. Mechanical behaviour of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutments with separate crowns- A laboratory study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(1):90-98, 2019.
  • Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Batolome JF, Pradies G. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27(6):1448-1455, 2012.
  • Batalla J, et al. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 27.1, 2012.
  • Abbo B, Razzog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1, 25-29, 2008.
  • Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Jr Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implantsupported crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 3, 344-348, 2000.
  • Farina AP, Spazzin AO, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions. J. Prosthet. Dent., 111:499-504, 2014.
  • Khraisat A, Abu-Hammad O, Dar-Odeh N, Al-Kayed AM. Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 6:157-164, 2004.
  • Xia D, Lin H, Yuan S, Bai W, Zheng G. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values. Biomed. Mater. Eng., 24:2143-2149, 2014.
  • Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 27:42-47, 2012.
  • Saboury A, Neshandar Asli H, Vaziri S. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments, Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 14:224-230, 2014.
  • Versluis A, Korioth TWP, Cardoso AC: Numerical analysis of a dental implant system preloaded with a washer, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 14:337-341, 1999.
  • Sakagushi RL, Borgersen SE: Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 10: 295-302, 1995.
  • Chu CM, et al. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: Three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation, Journal of periodontology, 83.1:111-118, 2012.
  • Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int. J. Prosthodont., 13:131-135, 2000.
  • Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J. Prosthet. Dent., 96:104-114, 2006.
  • Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent. Mater., 23:45-50, 2007.
  • Gargari M, Gloria F, Napoli E, Pujia AM. Zirconia: Cementation of prosthetic restorations. Literature review. Oral Implantol., 3(4): 25-29, 2010.
  • Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Dana CL, Beatty MW. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry, 1, 32-39, 1995.
  • Kent DK, Koka S, Froeschle ML. Retention of Cemented Implant- Supported Restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics, 3, 193-196, 1997.
  • Chu KM, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Hems E. Effect of screw hole filling on retention of implant crowns. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 4, 154-158, 2005.
  • Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 6:652-661, 1999.
  • Filser F, Luthy H, Kocher P, Scharer P, L. J. G. Posterior all-ceramic bridgework. Quintessence of Dental Technology, 1:28-41, 2003.
  • Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of allceramic crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont., 7:329-338, 1994.
  • Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int. J. Prosthodont., 6:462-467, 1993.
  • Öğreten, AT. Investigation of the effect of abutment size and substructure and superstructure thicknesses on the fracture strength of posterior implant-supported zirconium crowns, 2015.
  • Larsson, C, El Madhoun S, Wennerberg A, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia polycrystals crowns with different design: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7, 820-826, 2012.
  • Khan AA. The permanent first molar as an indicator for predicting caries activity. International Dental Journal, 44(6):623-627, 1994.
  • Moilanen P, Hjerppe J, Lassila LVJ, Närhi TO. Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. J. Oral. Implantol., Oct;44(5):330-334, 2018.
  • Atalay P. Evaluation of zirconia implant systems in terms of failure type and fracture resistance, 2018. Tunali B. Introduction to oral implantology with a multi-disciplinary approach. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Publications 1996: 67-133, 1996.
  • Tabata LF, et al. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three- dimensional finite element analysis, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26.3, 2011.
  • Mammadzada S. Evaluation of the effect of implant design on stress distribution in bone by finite element analysis, 2009.
  • Carvalho M, et al. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 112.5: 1096-1102, 2014.
  • Damlar İ, et al. Investigation of Stress Distributions of Two Commercial Implant Systems by Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Method, Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 2.3: 175-180, 2014.
  • Akça K, et al. Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants, Medical & biological engineering & computing, 53.5:453-462, 2015.
  • Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Yalcin S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. Finite Element Analysis New Trends and Developments. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech: 21-54, 2012.
  • Sevimay M. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 93.(3) 227-234, 2005.
  • Assunção, WG, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26.4, 2011.
  • Kayabasi O, Yüzbasıoglu E, Erzincanl F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method, Advances in engineering software, 37.10:649-658, 2006.
  • Terzioglu H, et al. Osseointegrated Implants; Investigation of the Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution by 3D Finite Element Stress Analysis Method, 2011.

Investigation of the Fracture Strength Between Dental Implant And Ti-Base Abutment Produced with Different Heights and Grades of Titanium Material

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 431 - 441, 31.12.2023

Hüseyin Anıl Banazlı Oguzhan Gorler

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409547

Abstract

New prosthetic designs were developed to provide a balanced transmission of the stress caused by the chewing function to other mechanical and anatomical structures, and these designs revealed new research areas. An example of this is screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. With screw-retained prostheses, the residual cement problem is eliminated. However, abutment material and abutment design may adversely affect the mechanical and aesthetic properties of prostheses. Ti-base abutments have been developed to solve these problems. However, studies on clinical succes, material content and abutment height of ti-base abutments remain up-to-date. In our study, the effect or abutment heights on the bond strength and stress distribution with monolithic zirconia crowns in ti-base abutments manufactured from different titanium Gr types will be tested. Titanium Gr 4, Gr 5 and Gr 23 ELI materials will be used in our study. A total of 7 groups are planned with ti-base abutments with a abutment length of 3.5 mm, 5.5 mm for Gr 4 and Gr 5, abutment length of 3.5 mm, 5.5 mm and 7 mm for Gr 23. In the in vitro experiment, the fracture strength of the samples will be tested with the universal testing device. total of 77 implants, ti-base abutments and monolithic zirconia crowns will be used by creating 11 samples for each study group. The obtained values will be recorded in Newtons and Megapascals. The data will be analysed using the SPSS 22.0 programme. As a result, while the lowest fracture strength values were observed in Gr 4 Ti material in all ti-base abutment lengths in the samples for which the fracture strength test was performed, similar values were observed in the ti-base abutments produced from Gr 5 and Gr 23 ELİ alloys. When the relationship of bonding strengths with Ti alloys was evaluated, it was seen that there was no significant difference between Ti alloys.

Keywords

Grade 4 titanium Grade 5 titanium Grade 23 titanium Fracture strength

Supporting Institution

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

References

  • McKinney RV. Endosteal dental implants: Mosby Year Book, 1991.
  • Duymuş ZY, Güngör H. Dental Implant Materials. Ataturk Univ. Dent. Fak. Journal, 23(1):142-152, 2013.
  • Günay A, Durakbaşa N, Katiboğlu AB. Evaluation of Surface Modifications of G4 Pure Titanium Implants Used in Dental Implantology by Sandblasting and Pickling Techniques Considering the Manufacturing Stages. Engineer and Machinery, 54(641),37-43, 2013.
  • Wang RR, Fenton A. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int., 27:401-408, 1996.
  • Parr GR, Gardner LK, Toth RW. Titanium: the mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental materials aspects. J Prosthet Dent., 54:410-414,1985.
  • Kononen M, Rintanen J, Waltimo A, Kempainen P. Titanium framework removable partial denture used for patient allergic to other metals: a clinical report and literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent., 73:4-7, 1995.
  • Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clinical oral implants research, 20(4):32-47, 2009.
  • Stimmelmayr M. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant- abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 28(12):1215-1220, 2012.
  • Mish CE. Dental Implant Prostheses, Chapter: Clinical Biomechanics in Implant Dentistry 309-321, Mosby, 309 pp., 2009.
  • Nanda RS, Tosun Y. Biomechanics in Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. 1st ed. Quintessence Publishing, Co. Inc. 2010.
  • Avallone E, Baumeister T, Sadegh A. Marks' standard handbook for mechanical engineers. 11 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
  • Adıgüzel Ö. Finite element analysis: a review Part I: areas of use in dentistry, basic concepts and element definitions. Dicle Dent. Derg., 11:18-23, 2010.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont, 11(5):517-521, 1998.
  • Lavkin HC. Biomimicry, dental implants and clinical trials. Journal of the American Dental Association, 129:226-230, 1998.
  • Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra- osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 3(2):81-100, 1969.
  • Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery Supplementum, 16:1-132, 1977.
  • Dere KA. Evaluation of Stress Values Generated in Type 2 Bone by Dental Implants with Two Different Geometries by Finite Element Analysis, 2017.
  • Fagon M. Implant Prosthodontics Surgical and Prosthetic. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Inc., 1990.
  • Davies JE. Mechanisms of endoosseous integration. J Prosthodontics, 11:391-401, 1998.
  • Edgerton M, Levine MJ. Biocompability: It's future in prosthodontic research. J Prosthet Dent., 69: 406-415, 1993.
  • Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, von Konow L, Lothigius E. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Impl Res., 9:225-234, 1998.
  • Preis V, et al. In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations, Journal of dentistry, 40.11:921-928, 2012.
  • Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, Liu R, Ma S, Zhou Z, Longquan S. Loadbearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials, 93- 101, 2014.
  • Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions, A systematic review. The International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 29 Suppl:84-98, 2014.
  • Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth J-F, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dental Materials. 28(12):1215-1220, 2012.
  • Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung K-H, Mancl LA. In vitro evaluation of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 109(4):255-263, 2013.
  • Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(1):12-18, 2012.
  • Baldassari M, Hjerppe J, Romeo D, Fickl S, Thompson VP, Stappert CF. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 30(3), 2012.
  • Gehrke P, Johannson D, Fischer C, Stawarczyk B, Beuer F. In vitro Fatigue and Fracture Resistance of One-and Two-piece CAD/CAM Zirconia Implant Abutments. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 30(3), 546-554, 2015.
  • Nouh I, Kern M, Sabet AE, Aboelfadl AK, Hamdy AM, Chaar MS. Mechanical behaviour of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutments with separate crowns- A laboratory study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(1):90-98, 2019.
  • Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Batolome JF, Pradies G. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27(6):1448-1455, 2012.
  • Batalla J, et al. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. International Journal of Oral § Maxillofacial Implants, 27.1, 2012.
  • Abbo B, Razzog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1, 25-29, 2008.
  • Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Jr Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implantsupported crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 3, 344-348, 2000.
  • Farina AP, Spazzin AO, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions. J. Prosthet. Dent., 111:499-504, 2014.
  • Khraisat A, Abu-Hammad O, Dar-Odeh N, Al-Kayed AM. Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 6:157-164, 2004.
  • Xia D, Lin H, Yuan S, Bai W, Zheng G. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values. Biomed. Mater. Eng., 24:2143-2149, 2014.
  • Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 27:42-47, 2012.
  • Saboury A, Neshandar Asli H, Vaziri S. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments, Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 14:224-230, 2014.
  • Versluis A, Korioth TWP, Cardoso AC: Numerical analysis of a dental implant system preloaded with a washer, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 14:337-341, 1999.
  • Sakagushi RL, Borgersen SE: Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 10: 295-302, 1995.
  • Chu CM, et al. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: Three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation, Journal of periodontology, 83.1:111-118, 2012.
  • Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int. J. Prosthodont., 13:131-135, 2000.
  • Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J. Prosthet. Dent., 96:104-114, 2006.
  • Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent. Mater., 23:45-50, 2007.
  • Gargari M, Gloria F, Napoli E, Pujia AM. Zirconia: Cementation of prosthetic restorations. Literature review. Oral Implantol., 3(4): 25-29, 2010.
  • Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Dana CL, Beatty MW. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry, 1, 32-39, 1995.
  • Kent DK, Koka S, Froeschle ML. Retention of Cemented Implant- Supported Restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics, 3, 193-196, 1997.
  • Chu KM, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Hems E. Effect of screw hole filling on retention of implant crowns. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 4, 154-158, 2005.
  • Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 6:652-661, 1999.
  • Filser F, Luthy H, Kocher P, Scharer P, L. J. G. Posterior all-ceramic bridgework. Quintessence of Dental Technology, 1:28-41, 2003.
  • Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of allceramic crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont., 7:329-338, 1994.
  • Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int. J. Prosthodont., 6:462-467, 1993.
  • Öğreten, AT. Investigation of the effect of abutment size and substructure and superstructure thicknesses on the fracture strength of posterior implant-supported zirconium crowns, 2015.
  • Larsson, C, El Madhoun S, Wennerberg A, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia polycrystals crowns with different design: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7, 820-826, 2012.
  • Khan AA. The permanent first molar as an indicator for predicting caries activity. International Dental Journal, 44(6):623-627, 1994.
  • Moilanen P, Hjerppe J, Lassila LVJ, Närhi TO. Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. J. Oral. Implantol., Oct;44(5):330-334, 2018.
  • Atalay P. Evaluation of zirconia implant systems in terms of failure type and fracture resistance, 2018. Tunali B. Introduction to oral implantology with a multi-disciplinary approach. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Publications 1996: 67-133, 1996.
  • Tabata LF, et al. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three- dimensional finite element analysis, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26.3, 2011.
  • Mammadzada S. Evaluation of the effect of implant design on stress distribution in bone by finite element analysis, 2009.
  • Carvalho M, et al. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 112.5: 1096-1102, 2014.
  • Damlar İ, et al. Investigation of Stress Distributions of Two Commercial Implant Systems by Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Method, Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 2.3: 175-180, 2014.
  • Akça K, et al. Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants, Medical & biological engineering & computing, 53.5:453-462, 2015.
  • Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Yalcin S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. Finite Element Analysis New Trends and Developments. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech: 21-54, 2012.
  • Sevimay M. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 93.(3) 227-234, 2005.
  • Assunção, WG, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26.4, 2011.
  • Kayabasi O, Yüzbasıoglu E, Erzincanl F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method, Advances in engineering software, 37.10:649-658, 2006.
  • Terzioglu H, et al. Osseointegrated Implants; Investigation of the Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution by 3D Finite Element Stress Analysis Method, 2011.
There are 68 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Prosthodontics
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Hüseyin Anıl Banazlı 0009-0005-4579-2982

Oguzhan Gorler 0000-0001-6545-8811

Publication Date December 31, 2023
Submission Date December 25, 2023
Acceptance Date December 27, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Banazlı HA, Gorler O (December 1, 2023) Investigation of the Fracture Strength Between Dental Implant And Ti-Base Abutment Produced with Different Heights and Grades of Titanium Material. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 4 431–441.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.