Effect of Repair Material Type and Thermocycling Aging on Repair Bond Strength to Various Artificial Teeth

Nazire Esra Özer; Ece İrem Oğuz

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1228510

EN TR

Effect of Repair Material Type and Thermocycling Aging on Repair Bond Strength to Various Artificial Teeth

Abstract

Objectives: To compare repair bond strength of acrylic and composite resin to different type of artificial teeth with and without thermocycling aging (TMC). Materials and Methods: A total of 192 specimens were prepared using four different types of artificial teeth (n=48) (Group CA-Conventional polymethylmethacrylate, Group IS-Isosite, Group DCL-Double cross-linked acrylic, Group NC-Nanohybrid composite). All specimens were aged with thermocycling (TMC; 5000 cycles, 5◦C/55◦C) and repaired with auto-polymerized acrylic resin or composite resin. Half of the repaired samples were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test while the other half were subjected to TMC to simulate the aging of the repair material. Then, artificially aged specimens were also subjected to SBS test. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Paired comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were made using Tukey HSD test (α=0.05). Results: The bond strength of both non-aged and artificially aged composite resin and non-aged acrylic resin did not differ according to artificial teeth type (p>0.05). However, artificially aged acrylic resin showed higher bond strength for group CA (9.25±2.96) than for group NC (5.01±3.09) (p<0.05). Bond strength of composite resin was higher than acrylic resin regardless of artificial teeth type and TMC (p<0.05). TMC decreased the bond strength of both acrylic and composite repair materials to all types of artificial teeth (p<0.05) Conclusions: New generation artificial teeth used in removable dentures are costly. Therefore, repairing fractured teeth with composite resins instead of replacing them can be both time-efficient and economical.

Keywords

Tamir Materyali Tipi ve Yaşlandırmanın Çeşitli Suni Dişlere Olan Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Akrilik ve kompozit rezinin farklı tipteki yapay dişlere termal yaşlandırma ile ve yaşlandırma olmadan tamir bağlantı dayanımını karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Dört farklı yapay diş tipi (n=48) kullanılarak toplam 192 numune hazırlandı (Grup CA-Konvansiyonel polimetilmetakrilat, Grup IS-İzosite, Grup DCL-Çift çapraz bağlı akrilik, Grup NC-Nanohibrit kompozit). Tüm örnekler termal siklus ile yaşlandırıldı (TMC; 5000 döngü, 5◦C/55◦C) ve otopolimerize akrilik rezin veya kompozit rezin ile tamir edildi. Tamir edilen örneklerin yarısı makaslama bağlanma dayanımı (SBS) testine, diğer yarısı ise tamir materyalinin yaşlanmasını taklit etmek için TMC’ye tabi tutuldu. Daha sonra yaşlandırılmış örneklere de SBS testi uygulandı. Veriler, üç yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. İkli karşılatırmalar tek yönlü ANOVA kullanılarak, çoklu karşılaştırmalar ise Tukey HSD testi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Hem yapay olarak yaşlandırılmamış hem de yaşlandırılmış kompozit rezinin ve yapay olarak yaşlandırılmış akrilik rezinin bağlanma dayanımı yapay diş tipine bağlı olarak değişiklik göstermedi (p>0.05). Öte yandan yapay olarak yaşlandırılmış akrilik rezin CA grubu (9,25±2,96) için NC grubuna (5,01±3,09) olandan daha yüksek bağlanma gücü gösterdi (p<0,05). Yapay diş çeşidi ve TMC den bağımsız olarak kompozitin bağlanma dayanımı akrilikten daha yüksek bulundu (p<0,05). TMC, hem akrilik hem de kompozit tamir materyalinin bağlanma gücünü tüm yapay diş tiplerinde azalttı (p<0.05) Sonuçlar: Hareketli bölümlü protezlerde kullanılan yeni nesil suni dişler pahalıdır. Bu nedenle kırık dişleri değiştirmek yerine kompozit rezinlerle tamir etmek hem zamandan kazanç sağlar hem de ekonomiktir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Suni diş, Makaslama bağlanma direnci, Otopolimerize akrilik rezin, Kompozit rezin

References

1. Imamura S, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I, Loyaga-Rendon PG, Minakuchi S. Effect of filler type and polishing on the discoloration of composite resin artificial teeth. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:802-808.
2. Muhammad N, Sarfraz Z, Zafar MS, Liaqat S, Rahim A, Ahmad P et al. Characterization of various acrylate based artificial teeth for denture fabrication. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022;33:17.
3. Quinn GD, Giuseppetti AA, Hoffman KH. Chipping fracture resistance of denture tooth materials. Dent Mater. 2014;30:545-553.
4. Barão VA, Ogawa ES, Moreno A, Mesquita MF, Wee AG, Assunção WG. Long-term clinical evaluation of the color stability and stainability of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:628-635.
5. Mayeen Uddin Khandaker Fenton, A.H. Selecting and arranging prosthetic teeth and occlusion for the edentulous patient. In: G. A. Zarb, C. L. Bolender (eds). Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. 12th St. Louis: Mosby, Inc.,2004:298-307.
6. Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater. 2006;22:243-249.
7. Powers Jm, Sakaguchi Rl (). Craig‟s Restorative Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis:Elsevier; 2006:544-546.
8. Meng GK, Chung KH, Fletcher-Stark ML, Zhang H. Effect of surface treatments and cyclic loading on the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth with autopolymerized repair acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:245-252.

9. Muhsin SA. Bond Strength of Repaired Acrylic Denture Teeth Using Visible Light Cure Composite Resin. Open Dent J. 2017;11:57-64.
10. Lagouvardos PE, Polyzois GL. Shear bond strength between composite resin and denture teeth: effect of tooth type and surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:499-504.
11. Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between composite resin and acrylic resin denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:383-386.
12. Shahdad SA, McCabe JF, Bull S, Rusby S, Wassell RW. Hardness measured with traditional Vickers and Martens hardness methods. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1079-1085.
13. Dal Piva A, Tribst J, Carvalho P, Uemura E, Paes Junior TJ, Borges A. Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth. Applied Adhesion Science. 2018;6:1-7.
14. Yanikoglu DN, Duymus DZ, Bayindir DF. Comparative bond strengths of autopolymerising denture resin and light cured composite resin to denture teeth. Int Dent J. 2002;52:20-24.
15. Cook WD, Beech DR, Tyas MJ. Structure and properties of methacrylate based dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 1985;6:362-368.
16. Papazoglou E, Vasilas AI. Shear bond strengths for composite and autopolymerized acrylic resins bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:573-578.
17. Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Unlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25:404-419.
18. ISO TR 11450: Dental Materials Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Organization for standardization, 1994.
19. Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CKY, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:699-705.
20. Choi JJE, Uy CE, Plaksina P, Ramani RS, Ganjigatti R, Waddell JN. Bond Strength of Denture Teeth to Heat-Cured, CAD/CAM and 3D Printed Denture Acrylics. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:415-421.
21. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:267-272.
22. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Al Taweel SM, Nagy WW. The Effect of Artificial Aging on The Bond Strength of Heat-activated Acrylic Resin to Surface-treated Nickel-chromium-beryllium Alloy. Open Dent J. 2016;10:124-130.
23. Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:485-491.
24. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M, Pashley DH et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater. 2007;23:885-892.
25. Geerts GA, Jooste CH. A comparison of the bond strengths of microwave- and water bath-cured denture material. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:406-409.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Nazire Esra Özer ^*
0000-0003-3917-7383
Türkiye

Ece İrem Oğuz
0000-0001-6128-9723
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 23, 2023

Submission Date

January 2, 2023

Acceptance Date

April 10, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 26 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1228510

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA64BR64CH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Özer NE, Oğuz Eİ (June 1, 2023) Effect of Repair Material Type and Thermocycling Aging on Repair Bond Strength to Various Artificial Teeth. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 2 150–156.

Cited By

Exploring the Properties and Indications of Chairside CAD/CAM Materials in Restorative Dentistry

Journal of Functional Biomaterials

https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020046

Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Four Types of Artificial Teeth to Acrylic Denture Base Under In Vitro Conditions

Contemporary Orofacial Science

https://doi.org/10.61882/cofs.3.4.3