Abstract
Keywords
Dental implant implant impression plastic impression transfer coping dimensional accuracy fastened impression coping
References
- 1. Nuzzolese E, Lepore MMI, Cukovic-Bagic FM, Vella G D. Forensic sciences and forensic odontology. International Dental Journal 2008;58(6): 342–348.
- 2. Tabesh M, Alikhasi M, Siadat H. A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 2018;10(2): 151–157.
- 3. Aguilar M L, Elias A, Vizcarrondo C E T, Psoter W J. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2010;103(4):202–209.
- 4. Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2012;25(1): 44–47.
- 5. Alsharbaty MHM, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28(4): 902–908.
- 6. Moura RV, Kojima AN, Saraceni CHC, Bassolli L, Balducci I, Özcan M, Mesquita AMM. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28(2): 530–535.
- 7. Fernandez M A, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression-transfer copings for implant restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics 2013;22(5): 367–376.
- 8. Hariharan R, Shankar M D S C, Rajan MDSM. Evaluation of Accuracy of Multiple Dental Implant. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2010;25(1):38-44.
- 9. Tan JZH, Tan MY, See Toh YL, Wong KY, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional positional accuracy of intraoral and laboratory implant scan bodies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):735-744.
- 10. Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):835-842.
- 11. Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. Int J Dent. 2018 Jun 4;2018:3761750.
- 12. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):779-796.
- 13. Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, Hardouin JB, Cheraud-Carpentier M, Mbodj EB, Soueidan A. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):71-79.
- 14. Nakhaei M, Madani AS, Moraditalab A, Haghi HR. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015; Sep-Oct;12(5):431-437.
- 15. Arieli A, Adawi M, Masri M, Weinberg E, Beitlitum I, Pilo R, Levartovsky S. The Accuracy of Open-Tray vs. Snap on Impression Techniques in A 6-Implant Model: An In Vitro 3D Study. Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 12;15(6):2103.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of plastic impression transfer copings on the dimensional accuracy of close tray implant impressions.
Methods: A master model was constructed using autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Five parallel holes were drilled for implant analogs. Custom impression trays were made with autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin. The study consisted of 2 groups (n=5): (group 1) Impression was obtained with using plastic impression transfer coping (group 2) Impression was obtained without using plastic impression transfer coping. Vinylpolysiloxane impression material was used for both groups. After the impression were obtained, casts were made by type IV dental stone. Casts were scanned with the lab-type scanner and transferred to the measurement program. Measurements were made from a specific reference corner for each analog to ensure standardization. Data were saved as millimeters and pairwise comparisons were made with Welch's t-test analysis.
Results: The effect of plastic caps was evaluated by applying the t-test to each distance. For all distances, the distortion seen in the measurements taken without the cap is higher than the measurements taken with the cap, but no significant differences were found (p>0.05).
Conclusions: In the anterior-posterior distances, the distortions were found compression type, in the right-left distances the distortions were found as expansion-type. There is a dimensional change in the measurements taken without a cap, but no clinically significant differences were found.
Keywords
Dental implant implant impression plastic impression transfer coping dimensional accuracy fastened impression coping
References
- 1. Nuzzolese E, Lepore MMI, Cukovic-Bagic FM, Vella G D. Forensic sciences and forensic odontology. International Dental Journal 2008;58(6): 342–348.
- 2. Tabesh M, Alikhasi M, Siadat H. A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 2018;10(2): 151–157.
- 3. Aguilar M L, Elias A, Vizcarrondo C E T, Psoter W J. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2010;103(4):202–209.
- 4. Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2012;25(1): 44–47.
- 5. Alsharbaty MHM, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28(4): 902–908.
- 6. Moura RV, Kojima AN, Saraceni CHC, Bassolli L, Balducci I, Özcan M, Mesquita AMM. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28(2): 530–535.
- 7. Fernandez M A, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression-transfer copings for implant restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics 2013;22(5): 367–376.
- 8. Hariharan R, Shankar M D S C, Rajan MDSM. Evaluation of Accuracy of Multiple Dental Implant. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2010;25(1):38-44.
- 9. Tan JZH, Tan MY, See Toh YL, Wong KY, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional positional accuracy of intraoral and laboratory implant scan bodies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):735-744.
- 10. Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):835-842.
- 11. Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. Int J Dent. 2018 Jun 4;2018:3761750.
- 12. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):779-796.
- 13. Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, Hardouin JB, Cheraud-Carpentier M, Mbodj EB, Soueidan A. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):71-79.
- 14. Nakhaei M, Madani AS, Moraditalab A, Haghi HR. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015; Sep-Oct;12(5):431-437.
- 15. Arieli A, Adawi M, Masri M, Weinberg E, Beitlitum I, Pilo R, Levartovsky S. The Accuracy of Open-Tray vs. Snap on Impression Techniques in A 6-Implant Model: An In Vitro 3D Study. Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 12;15(6):2103.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 26, 2023 |
| Submission Date | December 6, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 1 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.