Three-Dimensional Calculation of Sinus Augmentation Volume after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Samır Goyushov; Erhan Dursun; Kaan Orhan; Tolga Tözüm

doi:10.7126/cumudj.858177

EN

Three-Dimensional Calculation of Sinus Augmentation Volume after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: This study aimed to calculate the volume of the maxillary sinus and grafted part of it with different modes of three-dimensional reconstruction software. Materials and Methods: This retrospective volumetric cone-beam computed tomography study was carried out on 21 patients/ 36 maxillary sinuses who had undergone maxillary sinus lift surgery using a lateral approach, between 2010 and 2016 at the Department Periodontology. All statistical analyses were performed by using the NCSS (Number Cruncher Statistical System, Kaysville, Utah, U.S.A.) software. P values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The mean volume of the right maxillary sinus cavity was 15.37 cm³ while for the left it was 15.90 cm³. There was no statistically significant difference between right and left maxillary sinus volumes (p>0.05). An occupied portion of the sinus cavity after lateral sinus floor elevation surgery was approximately 14.87 %. Furthermore, the volume through manual and automatical modes of the software do not affect the results (p>0.05). The right and left sides of the maxillary sinus volumes were not different from each other. Gender and measuring mode was not found to be related to volumetric values of the maxillary sinus cavity. Conclusions: The grafted volume of the sinus cavity was defined as a safe volume in terms of serious complications during and after the surgery.

Keywords

References

1. Lerno P. Identification using the maxillary sinus. Chir Dent Fr. 1983; 53: 39-40.
2. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, et al. A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56: 1158-1163.
3. Anagnostopoulou S, Venieratos D, Spyropoulos N. Classification of human maxillar sinuses according to their geometric features. Anat Anz. 1991; 173: 121-130.
4. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, et al. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994; 23: 163-168.
5. Tatum JH. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986; 30: 207-229.
6. Lopez MA, Andreasi MB, Confalone L, et al. CRESTAL SINUS LIFT USING A FLUIDO-DYNAMIC COMPUTER GUIDED PRECISE AND ATRAUMATIC TECHNIQUE. J Biol Regul Homeost agents. 2015; 29: 67-73.
7. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85: 8-17.
8. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, et al. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 11-45.

9. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24: 565-577.
10. Lin YH, Yang YC, Wen SC, et al. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during lateral window sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 612-617.
11. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, et al. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int Journal Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 1128-1132.
12. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 416-424.
13. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, et al. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60: 277-284.
14. Valentini P, Abensur D. Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a clinical study of 20 patients. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1997; 17: 232-241.
15. Quirynen M, Lamoral Y, Dekeyser C, et al. The CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 36-41.
16. Gulec M, Tassoker M, Magat G, et al. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol. 2019; doi: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0106.
17. Kahnberg KE, Nilsson P, Hirsch JM, et al. Sinus lifting procedure: I. One‐stage surgery with bone transplant and implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 479-487.
18. Wang H-L, Katranji A. ABC sinus augmentation classification. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 2008; 28; 383-389.
19. Kraut RA. A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56: 1163.
20. Schaeffer JP. The sinus maxillaris and its relations in the embryo, child, and adult man. Am J Anat. 1910; 10: 313-368.
21. Stutzki M, Jahns E, Mandapathil MM, et al. Indications of cone beam CT in head and neck imaging. Acta oto-laryngol. 2015;135:1337-1343.
22. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, et al. Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 811-818.
23. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, et al. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007; 34: 191-195.
24. Belgin CA, Colak M, Adiguzel O, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276(5): 1493-1499.
25. Dellavia C, Speroni S, Pellegrini G, et al. A new method to evaluate volumetric changes in sinus augmentation procedure. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 684-690.
26. Lawson W, Patel ZM, Lin FY. The development and pathologic processes that influence maxillary sinus pneumatization. Anat Rec: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. 2008; 291: 1554-1563.
27. Farina R, Pramstraller M, Franceschetti G, et al. Alveolar ridge dimensions in maxillary posterior sextants: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 1138-1144.
28. TAKAHASHI Y, WATANABE T, IIMURA A, et al. A study of the maxillary sinus volume in elderly persons using Japanese cadavers. Okajimas Folia Anat Japonica. 2016; 93: 21-27.
29. Park I-H, Song JS, Choi H, et al. Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 74: 1347-1350.
30. Kwon JJ, Hwang J, Kim YD, et al. Automatic three‐dimensional analysis of bone volume and quality change after maxillary sinus augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21: 1148-1155.
31. Sonoda T, Harada T, Yamamichi N, et al. Association Between Bone Graft Volume and Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 735-740.
32. Nagla'a A, Bahammam MA. Cone Beam CT-Based Preoperative Volumetric Estimation of Bone Graft Required for Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation, Compared with Intraoperative Findings: A Pilot Study. Open Dent J. 2018; 12: 820-826.
33. Alayan J, Ivanovski S. A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen‐stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation—Complications, patient‐reported outcomes and volumetric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 248-262.
34. Sahlstrand-Johnson P, Jannert M, Strömbeck A, et al. Computed tomography measurements of different dimensions of maxillary and frontal sinuses. BMC Med Imaging. 2011; 11: 8.
35. Quirynen M, Lefever D, Hellings P, et al. Transient swelling of the S chneiderian membrane after transversal sinus augmentation: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 36-41.
36. Makary C, Menhall A, Rebaudi A. Early postoperative reactions following lateral sinus floor elevation using piezosurgery: A radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21: 888-894.
37. Makary C, Rebaudi A, Menhall A, et al. Changes in Sinus Membrane Thickness After Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation: A Radiographic Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 331-337.
38. Deepthi B, Shetty S, Babu C, et al. Correlation between gingival phenotype, residual ridge height and the Schneiderian membrane. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res. 2012; 3: 111-115.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Samır Goyushov ^*
0000-0002-0356-7622
Türkiye

Erhan Dursun
0000-0003-2137-8638
Türkiye

Kaan Orhan
0000-0001-6768-0176
Türkiye

Tolga Tözüm
0000-0002-7485-7272
Türkiye

Publication Date

May 31, 2021

Submission Date

January 11, 2021

Acceptance Date

April 25, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 24 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.858177

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA47KH94NY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Goyushov S, Dursun E, Orhan K, Tözüm T (May 1, 2021) Three-Dimensional Calculation of Sinus Augmentation Volume after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24 2 163–169.

Cited By

Vertical Bone Augmentation with GBR Pocket Technique: Surgical Procedure and Preliminary Results

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3243

Determinants of Early and Late Complications After Lateral Window Sinus Elevation: A Two-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1873010

Öz

Three-Dimensional Calculation of Sinus Augmentation Volume after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Vertical Bone Augmentation with GBR Pocket Technique: Surgical Procedure and Preliminary Results

Determinants of Early and Late Complications After Lateral Window Sinus Elevation: A Two-Year Retrospective Cohort Study