BibTex RIS Cite

Effect of sandblasting with different size of aluminum oxide particles on tensile bond strength of resilient liner to denture base

Year 2011, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 5 - 11, 22.01.2011

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bonding properties of sandblasted with different size of aluminum oxide particles denture base to silicone based soft denture liner.

Methods: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) test specimens were fabricated and then randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15), according to the treatments applied, untreated (control, group 1), sandblasted with 50 µm Al2O3 (group 2), 60 µm Al2O3 (group 3), 120 µm Al2O3 (group 4), and 250 µm Al2O3 (group 5). The resilient liner specimens were processed between 2 PMMA blocks. Bonding strength of the liners to PMMA was compared by tensile test with the use of universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The mean value and standard deviation of the specimens were statistically evaluated by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests (α=0.05).

Results: The highest mean force value was observed in group 4 specimens, and the lowest mean force value was observed in group 2 specimens. The differences between groups 1 and 4 was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference in tensile bond strength between groups 1 (control) and groups 2, 3, and 5 specimens.

Conclusion: Different particle sizes of aluminum oxide particles affect the bond strength of PMMA/resilient liner. Furthermore, 120 µm Al2O3 particles are the best particle size to improve strength of the bond.

Keywords: Sandblasting, tensile bond strength, soft liner, aluminum oxide.

References

  • 1. Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23:1373-1381.
  • 2. Botega DM, Sanchez JL, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Consani RL. Effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. J Prosthodont 2008;17:550–554.
  • 3. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD. Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:183-189.
  • 4. Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004;71:196–200.
  • 5. Leon BLT, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of resilient denture lining materials polymerized by different methods after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:282-287.
  • 6. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347–1352.
  • 7. Aydin AK, Terzioğlu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211–218.
  • 8. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;63:382–392.
  • 9. Storer R. Resilient denture base materials. Part 1, introduction and laboratory evaluation. Br Dent J 1962;113:195-203.
  • 10. Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-346.
  • 11. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-158.
  • 12. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone based soft denture liner. Lasers Med Sci 21 August 2010.
  • 13. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to denture resin after Er:YAG laser treatments with different pulse durations and levels of energy. Lasers Med Sci 2010 ( in press).
  • 14. Hatamleh MM, Maryan CJ, Silikas N, Watts DC. Effect of net fiber reinforcement surface treatment on soft denture liner retention and longevity. J Prosthodont 2010;1-5.
  • 15. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:267–274.
  • 16. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26(7):650-658.
  • 17. Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heatpressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:123-130.
  • 18. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazici AR, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated aluminaceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848–856.
  • 19. Swift Jr EJ, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992;8:362–365.
  • 20. Pontes AP, Oshima HM, Pacheco JF, Martins JL, Shinkai RS. Shear bond strength of direct composite repairs in indirect composite systems. Gen Dent 2005;53:343–347.
  • 21. Papacchini F, Radovic I, Magni E, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Chieffi N, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Flowable composites as intermediate agents without adhesive application in resin composite repair: a bond strength and SEM study. Am J Dent 2008;21(1):53- 58.
  • 22. Swift Jr EJ, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992;8:193–196.
  • 23. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dualcured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: Microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 2007;35:496-502.
  • 24. Winkler S, Wongthai P. Increasing the bond strength of metal–ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:396–401.
  • 25. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dent Mater 1993;9:151–161.
  • 26. Chung KH, Chung CY, Chung CY, Chan DC. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35;268–275.
  • 27. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: The effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290.
  • 28. Zhang H, Fang J, Hu Z, Ma J, Han Y, Bian J. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the bonding of a soft liner to an acrylic resin denture material. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):398-402.
  • 29. Katsumata Y, Hojo S, Hamano N, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi H, Okada S, Teranaka T, Ino S. Bonding strength of autopolymerizing resin to nylon denture base polymer. Dent Mater J 2009;28(4):409-418.
  • 30. Wang CS, Chen KK, Tajima K, Nagamatsu Y, Kakigawa H, Kozono Y. Effects of sandblasting media and steam cleaning on bond strength of titaniumporcelain. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):381-391.
  • 31. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310.
Year 2011, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 5 - 11, 22.01.2011

Abstract

References

  • 1. Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23:1373-1381.
  • 2. Botega DM, Sanchez JL, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Consani RL. Effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. J Prosthodont 2008;17:550–554.
  • 3. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD. Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:183-189.
  • 4. Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004;71:196–200.
  • 5. Leon BLT, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of resilient denture lining materials polymerized by different methods after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:282-287.
  • 6. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347–1352.
  • 7. Aydin AK, Terzioğlu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211–218.
  • 8. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;63:382–392.
  • 9. Storer R. Resilient denture base materials. Part 1, introduction and laboratory evaluation. Br Dent J 1962;113:195-203.
  • 10. Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-346.
  • 11. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-158.
  • 12. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone based soft denture liner. Lasers Med Sci 21 August 2010.
  • 13. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to denture resin after Er:YAG laser treatments with different pulse durations and levels of energy. Lasers Med Sci 2010 ( in press).
  • 14. Hatamleh MM, Maryan CJ, Silikas N, Watts DC. Effect of net fiber reinforcement surface treatment on soft denture liner retention and longevity. J Prosthodont 2010;1-5.
  • 15. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:267–274.
  • 16. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26(7):650-658.
  • 17. Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heatpressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:123-130.
  • 18. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazici AR, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated aluminaceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848–856.
  • 19. Swift Jr EJ, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992;8:362–365.
  • 20. Pontes AP, Oshima HM, Pacheco JF, Martins JL, Shinkai RS. Shear bond strength of direct composite repairs in indirect composite systems. Gen Dent 2005;53:343–347.
  • 21. Papacchini F, Radovic I, Magni E, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Chieffi N, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Flowable composites as intermediate agents without adhesive application in resin composite repair: a bond strength and SEM study. Am J Dent 2008;21(1):53- 58.
  • 22. Swift Jr EJ, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992;8:193–196.
  • 23. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dualcured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: Microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 2007;35:496-502.
  • 24. Winkler S, Wongthai P. Increasing the bond strength of metal–ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:396–401.
  • 25. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dent Mater 1993;9:151–161.
  • 26. Chung KH, Chung CY, Chung CY, Chan DC. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35;268–275.
  • 27. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: The effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290.
  • 28. Zhang H, Fang J, Hu Z, Ma J, Han Y, Bian J. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the bonding of a soft liner to an acrylic resin denture material. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):398-402.
  • 29. Katsumata Y, Hojo S, Hamano N, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi H, Okada S, Teranaka T, Ino S. Bonding strength of autopolymerizing resin to nylon denture base polymer. Dent Mater J 2009;28(4):409-418.
  • 30. Wang CS, Chen KK, Tajima K, Nagamatsu Y, Kakigawa H, Kozono Y. Effects of sandblasting media and steam cleaning on bond strength of titaniumporcelain. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):381-391.
  • 31. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Hakan Akın

Faik Tugut

Burcu Mutaf

Umit Guney

Ali Ozdemir

Publication Date January 22, 2011
Submission Date November 22, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2011Volume: 14 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Akın H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U, Ozdemir A (January 1, 2011) Effect of sandblasting with different size of aluminum oxide particles on tensile bond strength of resilient liner to denture base. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 14 1 5–11.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.